The complex response of continental silicate rock weathering to the colonization of the continents by vascular plants in the Devonian

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Algeo T.,
   2. Scheckler S. E.

   , 1998, Terrestrial-marine teleconnections in the Devonian: links between the evolution of land plants, weathering processes, and marine anoxic events: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, v. 353, n. 1365, p.113–130, doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1998.0195

   OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Berner R. A.

   , 1998, The carbon cycle and CO₂ over Phanerozoic time: the role of land plants: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, v. 353, n. 1365, p. 75–82, doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1998.0192

   OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Berner R. A.

   , 2004, The Phanerozoic carbon cycle: CO₂ and O₂: New York, Oxford University Press, 150 p., doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195173338.001.0001

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. ↵
   1. Boyce C. K.,
   2. Lee J.-E.

   , 2016, Plant evolution and climate over geological timescales: Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, v. 45, p. 61–87, doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-063016-015629

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. ↵
   1. Brugger J.,
   2. Hoffman M.,
   3. Petri S.,
   4. Feulner G.

   , 2019, On the sensitivity of the Devonian climate to continental configuration, vegetation cover, orbital configuration, CO₂ concentration, and insolation: Palaeoceanography and Paleoclimatology, v. 34, n. 8, p. 1375–1398, doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2019PA003562

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. ↵
   1. Calmels D.,
   2. Gaillardet J.,
   3. Brenot A.,
   4. France-Lanord C.

   , 2007, Sustained sulfide oxidation by physical erosion processes in the Mackenzie river basin: climatic perspectives: Geology, v. 35, n. 11, p. 1003–1006, doi:https://doi.org/10.1130/G24132A.1

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
7. ↵
   1. Carretier S.,
   2. Goddéris Y.,
   3. Delannoy T.,
   4. Rouby D.

   , 2014, Mean bedrock-to-saprolite conversion and erosion rates during mountain growth and decline: Geomorphology, v. 209, p. 39–52, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.11.025

   OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
8. ↵
   1. Carriere A.,
   2. Le Bouteiller C.,
   3. Tucker G. E,
   4. Klotz S.,
   5. Naaim M.

   , 2020, Impact of vegetation on erosion: insights from the calibration and test of a landscape evolution model in alpine badland catchments: Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, v. 45, n. 5, p. 1085–1099, doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4741

   OpenUrlCrossRef
9. ↵
   1. D'Antonio M. P.,
   2. Ibarra D. E.,
   3. Boyce C. K.

   , 2020, Land plant evolution decreased, rather than increased, weathering rates: Geology, v. 48, n. 1, p. 29–33, doi:https://doi.org/10.1130/G46776.1

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. ↵
    1. Davies N. S.,
    2. Gibling M. R.

    , 2010, Paleozoic vegetation and the Siluro-Devonian rise of fluvial accretion sets: Geology, v. 38, n. 1, p. 51–54, doi:https://doi.org/10.1130/G30443.1

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
11. ↵
    1. Davy P.,
    2. Lague D.

    , 2009, The erosion/transport equation of landscape evolution models revisited: Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, v. 114, n. F3, F03007, doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JF001146

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. ↵
    1. Dietrich W. E.,
    2. Perron J. T.

    , 2006, The search for a topographic signature of life: Nature, v. 439, p. 411–418, doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04452

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. ↵
    1. Donnadieu Y.,
    2. Goddéris Y.,
    3. Pierrehumbert R.,
    4. Dromart G.,
    5. Fluteau F.,
    6. Jacob R.

    , 2006, A GEOCLIM simulation of climatic and biogeochemical consequences of Pangea breakup: Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, v. 7, n. 11, Q11019, doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GC001278

    OpenUrlCrossRef
14. ↵
    1. Gensel P.,
    2. Edwards D.

    1. Driese S. G.,
    2. Mora C. I.

    , 2001, Diversification of Siluro-Devonian plant traces in paleosols and influence on estimates of paleoatmospheric CO₂ levels, in Gensel P., Edwards D., editors, Plants invade the land: Columbia University Press, p. 237–253, doi:https://doi.org/10.7312/gens11160-014

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. ↵
    1. Edwards D.,
    2. Cherns L.,
    3. Raven J. A.

    , 2015, Could land-based early photosynthesizing ecosystems have bioengineered the planet in mid-Paleozoic times?: Paleontology, v. 58, n. 5, p. 803–837, doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/pala.12187

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. ↵
    1. Ferrier K. L.,
    2. Kirchner J. W.

    , 2008, Effect of physical erosion on chemical denudation rates: a numerical modeling study of soil-mantled hillslopes: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 272, n. 3–4, p. 591–599, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.05.024

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. Foster G. L.,
    2. Royer D. L.,
    3. Lunt D. J.

    , 2017, Future climate forcing potentially without precedent in the last 620 million years: Nature Communications, v. 8, 14845, doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14845

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. ↵
    1. France-Lanord C.,
    2. Derry L. A.

    , 1997, Organic carbon burial forcing of the carbon cycle from Himalayan erosion: Nature, v. 390, p. 65–67, doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/36324

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
19. ↵
    1. Gabet E. J.,
    2. Mudd S. M.

    , 2009, A theoretical model coupling chemical weathering rates with denudation rates: Geology, v. 37, n. 2, p. 151–154, doi:https://doi.org/10.1130/G25270A.1

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
20. ↵
    1. Gaillardet J.,
    2. Dupré B.,
    3. Louvat P.,
    4. Allègre C. J.

    , 1999, Global silicate weathering and CO2 consumption rates deduced from the chemistry of large rivers: Chemical Geology, v. 159, n. 1–4, p. 3–30, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(99)00031-5

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
21. ↵
    1. Galy V.,
    2. France-Lanord C.,
    3. Beyssac O.,
    4. Faure P.,
    5. Kudrass H.,
    6. Palhol F.

    , 2007, Efficient organic carbon burial in the Bengal fan sustained by the Himalayan erosional system: Nature, v. 450, p. 407–410, doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06273

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. ↵
    1. Garcia-Ruiz J. M.,
    2. Beguria S.,
    3. Nadal-Romero E.,
    4. Gonzalez-Hidalgo J. C.,
    5. Lana-Renault N.,
    6. Sanjuan Y.

    , 2015, A meta-analysis of soil erosion rates across the world: Geomorphology, v. 239, p. 160–173, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.03.008

    OpenUrlCrossRef
23. ↵
    1. Goddéris Y.,
    2. Donnadieu Y.

    , 2019, A sink- or a source-driven carbon cycle at the geological timescale? Relative importance of palaeogeography versus solid Earth degassing rate in the Phanerozoic climatic evolution: Geological Magazine, v. 156, n. 2, p. 355–365, doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756817001054

    OpenUrlCrossRef
24. ↵
    1. Goddéris Y.,
    2. Joachimski M. M.

    , 2004, Global change in the late Devonian: modelling the Frasnian-Famennian short-term carbon isotope excursions: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 202, n. 3–4, p. 309–329, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-0182(03)00641-2

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
25. ↵
    1. Goddéris Y.,
    2. Donnadieu Y.,
    3. Le Hir G.,
    4. Lefebvre V.,
    5. Nardin E.

    , 2014, The role of palaeogeography in the Phanerozoic history of atmospheric CO₂ and climate: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 128, p. 122–138, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.11.004

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
26. ↵
    1. Goddéris Y.,
    2. Donnadieu Y.,
    3. Carretier S.,
    4. Aretz M.,
    5. Dera G.,
    6. Macouin M.,
    7. Regard V.

    , 2017, Onset and ending of the late Paleozoic ice age triggered by tectonically paced rock weathering: Nature Geoscience, v. 10, p. 382–387, doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2931

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. ↵
    1. Kiessling W.,
    2. Flügel E.,
    3. Golonka J.

    1. Golonka J.,
    2. Kiessling W.

    , 2002, Phanerozoic time scale and definition of time slices, in Kiessling W., Flügel E., Golonka J., editors, Phanerozoic Reef Patterns: SEPM special publication, v. 72, doi:https://doi.org/10.2110/pec.02.72.0011

    OpenUrlCrossRef
28. ↵
    1. Greb S. F.,
    2. DiMichele W. A.

    1. Greb S. F.,
    2. DiMichele W. A.,
    3. Gastalo R. A.

    , 2006, Evolution and importance of wetlands in Earth history, in Greb S. F., DiMichele W. A., editors, Wetlands through time: Geological Society of America Special Papers, v. 399, p. 1–40, doi:https://doi.org/10.1130/2006.2399(01)

    OpenUrlCrossRef
29. ↵
    1. Heimsath A. M.,
    2. Dietrich W. E.,
    3. Nishiizumi K.,
    4. Finkel R. C.

    , 1997, The soil production function and landscape equilibrium: Nature, v. 388, p. 358–361, doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/41056

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
30. ↵
    1. Humphrey G. S.,
    2. Wilkinson M. T.

    , 2007, The soil production function: a brief history and its rediscovery: Geoderma, v. 139, n. 1–2, p. 73–78, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.01.004

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
31. ↵
    1. Ibarra D. E.,
    2. Rugenstein J. K. C.,
    3. Bachan A.,
    4. Baresh A.,
    5. Lau K. V.,
    6. Thomas D. L.,
    7. Lee J.-E.,
    8. Boyce C. K.,
    9. Chamberlain C. P.

    , 2019, Modeling the consequences of land plants evolution on silicate weathering: American Journal of Science, v. 319, n. 1, p.1–43, doi:https://doi.org/10.2475/01.2019.01

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
32. ↵
    1. Istanbulluoglu E.,
    2. Bras R. L.

    , 2005, Vegetation-modulated landscape evolution: effects of vegetation on landscape processes, drainage intensity, and topography: Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, v. 110, n. F2, F02012, doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JF000249

    OpenUrlCrossRef
33. ↵
    1. Joachimski M. M.,
    2. Bresig S.,
    3. Buggisch W.,
    4. Talent J. A.,
    5. Mawson R.,
    6. Gereke M.,
    7. Morrow J. R.,
    8. Day J.,
    9. Weddige K.

    , 2009, Devonian climate and reef evolution: insights from oxygen isotopes in apatite: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 284, n. 3–4, p. 599–609, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2009.05.028

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. ↵
    1. Joshi M. M.,
    2. Mills B. J. W.,
    3. Johnson M.

    , 2019, A capacitor-discharge mechanism to explain the timing of orogeny-related global glaciations: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 46, n. 14, p. 8347–8354, doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083368

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. ↵
    1. Krause A. J.,
    2. Mills B. J. W.,
    3. Zhang S.,
    4. Planavsky N. J.,
    5. Lenton T. M.,
    6. Poulton S. W.

    , 2018, Stepwise oxygenation of the Paleozoic atmosphere: Nature Communications, v. 9, 4081, doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06383-y

    OpenUrlCrossRef
36. ↵
    1. Ruddiman

    1. Kump L. R.,
    2. Arthur M. A.

    , 1997, Global chemical erosion during the Cenozoic: weatherability balances the budget, in Ruddiman, editor, Tectonic Uplift and Climate Change: Boston, MA, Springer, p. 399–426, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5935-1_18

    OpenUrlCrossRef
37. ↵
    1. Langbein W. B.,
    2. Schumm S. A.

    , 1958, Yield of sediment in relation to mean annual precipitation: Eos, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, v. 39, n. 6, p. 1076–1084, doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/TR039i006p01076

    OpenUrlCrossRef
38. ↵
    1. Le Hir G.,
    2. Donnadieu Y.,
    3. Goddéris Y.,
    4. Meyer-Berthaud B.,
    5. Ramstein G.,
    6. Blakey R. C.

    , 2011, The climate change caused by the land plants invasion in the Devonian: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 310, n. 3–4, p. 203–212, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.08.042

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
39. ↵
    1. Lenton T. M.,
    2. Crouch M.,
    3. Johnson M.,
    4. Pires N.,
    5. Dolan L.

    , 2012, First plants cooled the Ordovician: Nature Geoscience, v. 5, p. 86–89, doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1390

    OpenUrlCrossRef
40. ↵
    1. Lenton T. M.,
    2. Daines S. J.,
    3. Mills B. J. W.

    , 2018, COPSE reloaded: an improved model of biogeochemical cycling over Phanerozoic time: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 178, p. 1–28, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.12.004

    OpenUrlCrossRef
41. ↵
    1. Maffre P.,
    2. Ladant J.-B.,
    3. Moquet J.-S.,
    4. Carretier S.,
    5. Labat D.,
    6. Goddéris Y.

    , 2018, Moutain ranges, climate and weathering. Do orogens strengthen or weaken the silicate weathering carbon sink?: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 493, p. 174–185, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2018.04.034

    OpenUrlCrossRef
42. ↵
    1. Maffre P.,
    2. Swanson-Hysell N. L.,
    3. Goddéris Y.

    , 2021, Limited carbon cycle response to increased sulfide weathering due to oxygen feedback: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 48, n. 19, e2021GL094589, doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094589

    OpenUrlCrossRef
43. ↵
    1. Maher K.,
    2. Chamberlain C.

    , 2014, Hydrologic regulation of chemical weathering and the geologic carbon cycle: Science, v. 343, n. 6178, p. 1502–1504, doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250770

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
44. ↵
    1. Mishra A. K.,
    2. Placzek C.,
    3. Jones R.

    , 2019, Coupled influence of precipitation and vegetation on millennial-scale erosion rates derived from ¹⁰Be: PLoS ONE, v. 14, n. 1, e021132, doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211325

    OpenUrlCrossRef
45. ↵
    1. Morris J. L.,
    2. Puttick M. N.,
    3. Clark J. W.,
    4. Edwards D.,
    5. Kenrick P.,
    6. Pressel S.,
    7. Wellman C. H.,
    8. Yang Z.,
    9. Schneider H.,
    10. Donoghue P. C. J.

    , 2018, The timescale of early land plant evolution: Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, v. 115, n. 10, p. E2274–E2283, doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719588115
46. ↵
    1. Moulton K. L.,
    2. West J.,
    3. Berner R. A.

    , 2000, Solute flux and mineral mass balance approaches to the quantification of plant effects on silicate weathering: American Journal of Science, v. 300, n. 7, p. 539–570, doi:https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.300.7.539

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
47. ↵
    1. Navarre-Sitchler A.,
    2. Brantley S.,
    3. Rother G.

    , 2015, How porosity increases during incipient weathering of crystalline silicate rocks: Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, v. 80, p. 331–354, doi:https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2015.80.10

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
48. ↵
    1. Norton K. P.,
    2. Molnar P.,
    3. Schlunegger F.

    , 2014, The role of climate- driven chemical weathering on soil production: Geomorphology, v. 204, p. 510–517, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.08.030

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
49. ↵
    1. Ochoa P. A.,
    2. Fries A.,
    3. Mejia D.,
    4. Burneo J. I.,
    5. Ruíz-Sinoga J. D.,
    6. Cerdà A.

    , 2016, Effects of climate, land cover and topography on soil erosion risk in semi-arid basins of the Andes: Catena, v. 140, p. 31–42, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.01.011

    OpenUrlCrossRef
50. ↵
    1. Oliva P.,
    2. Viers J.,
    3. Dupré B.

    , 2003, Chemical weathering in granitic environments: Chemical Geology, v. 202, n. 3–4, p. 225–256, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2002.08.001

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
51. ↵
    1. Panagos P.,
    2. Borreli P.,
    3. Meusburger K.,
    4. Alewell C.,
    5. Lugato E.,
    6. Montanarella L.

    , 2015, Estimating the soil erosion cover-management factor at the European scale: Land Use Policy, v. 48, p. 38–50, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.05.021

    OpenUrlCrossRef
52. ↵
    1. Pawlik L.,
    2. Buma B.,
    3. Samonil P.,
    4. Kvacek J.,
    5. Galazka A.,
    6. Kohout P.,
    7. Malik I.

    , 2020, Impact of trees and forests on the Devonian landscape and weathering processes with implications to the global Earth's system properties – a critical review: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 205, 103200, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103200

    OpenUrlCrossRef
53. ↵
    1. Penman D. E.,
    2. Rugenstein J. K. C.,
    3. Ibarra D. E.,
    4. Winnick M. J.

    , 2020, Silicate weathering as a feedback and forcing in Earth's climate and carbon cycle: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 209, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103298

    OpenUrlCrossRef
54. ↵
    1. Porada P.,
    2. Lenton T. M.,
    3. Pohl A.,
    4. Weber B.,
    5. Mander L.,
    6. Donnadieu Y.,
    7. Beer C.,
    8. Pöschl U.,
    9. Kleidon A.

    , 2016, High potential for weathering and climate effects of non-vascular vegetation in the late Ordovician: Nature Communications, v. 7, 12113, doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12113

    OpenUrlCrossRef
55. ↵
    1. Porder S.

    , 2019, How plants enhance weathering and how weathering is important to plants: Elements, v. 15, n. 4, p 241–246, doi:https://doi.org/10.2138/gselements.15.4.241

    OpenUrlCrossRef
56. ↵
    1. Raymo M. E.

    , 1991, Geochemical evidence supporting T. C. Chamberlin's theory of glaciation: Geology, v. 19, n. 4, p. 344–347, doi:https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1991)019<0344:GESTCC>2.3.CO;2

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
57. ↵
    1. Royer D. L.,
    2. Berner R. A.,
    3. Park J.

    , 2007, Climate sensitivity constrained by CO₂ concentrations over the past 420 million years: Nature, v. 446, p. 530–532, doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05699

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefPubMedWeb of Science
58. ↵
    1. Royer D. L.,
    2. Donnadieu Y.,
    3. Park J.,
    4. Kowalczyk J.,
    5. Goddéris Y.

    , 2014, Error analysis of CO₂ and O₂ estimates from the long-term geochemical model GEOCARBSULF: American Journal of Science, v. 314, n. 9, p. 1259–1283, doi:https://doi.org/10.2475/09.2014.01

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
59. ↵
    1. Rubinstein C. V.,
    2. Gerrienne P.,
    3. de la Puente G. S.,
    4. Astini R. A.,
    5. Steemans P.

    , 2010, Early middle Ordovician evidence for land plants in Argentina (eastern Gondwana): New Phytologist, v. 188, n. 2, p. 365–369, doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03433.x

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
60. ↵
    1. Stallard R. F.,
    2. Edmond J. M.

    , 1983, Geochemistry of the Amazon 2: the influence of the geology and weathering environmenton the dissolved load: Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, v. 88, n. C14, p. 9671–9688, doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/JC088iC14p09671

    OpenUrlCrossRef
61. ↵
    1. Starke J.,
    2. Ehlers T. A.,
    3. Schaller M.

    , 2020, Latitudinal effect of vegetation on erosion rates identified along western South America: Science, v. 367, n. 6484, p. 1358–1361, doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz0840

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
62. ↵
    1. Stein W. E.,
    2. Berry C. M.,
    3. Morris J. L.,
    4. Hernick L. V.,
    5. Mannolini F.,
    6. Straeten C. V.,
    7. Landing E.,
    8. Marshall J. E. A.,
    9. Wellman C. H.,
    10. Beerlong D. J.,
    11. Leake J. R.

    , 2020, Mid-Devonian Archaeopteris roots signal revolutionary change in earliest fossil forests: Current Biology, v. 30, n. 3, p. 421–431, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.11.067

    OpenUrlCrossRef
63. ↵
    1. Torres M. A.,
    2. West A. J.,
    3. Clark K. E.,
    4. Paris G.,
    5. Bouchez J.,
    6. Ponton C.,
    7. Feakins S. J.,
    8. Galy V.,
    9. Adkins J. F.

    , 2016, The acid and alkalinity budgets of weathering in the Andes-Amazon system: insights into the erosional control of global biogeochemical cycles: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 450, p. 381–391, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.06.012

    OpenUrlCrossRef
64. ↵
    1. Vanacker V.,
    2. von Blanckenburg F.,
    3. Govers G.,
    4. Molina A.,
    5. Poesen J.,
    6. Deckers J.,
    7. Kubik P.

    , 2007, Restoring dense vegetation can slow mountain erosion to near natural benchmark levels: Geology, v. 35, n. 4, p. 303–306, doi:https://doi.org/10.1130/G23109A.1

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
65. ↵
    1. Walker J. C. G.,
    2. Hays P. B.,
    3. Kasting J. F.

    , 1981, A negative feedback mechanism for the long-term stabilization of Earth's surface temperature: Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, v. 86, n. C10, p. 9776–9782, doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/JC086iC10p09776

    OpenUrlCrossRef
66. ↵
    1. West A. J.

    , 2012, Thickness of the chemical weathering zone and implications for erosional and climatic drivers of weathering and for carbon-cycle feedbacks: Geology, v. 40, n. 9, p. 811–814, doi:https://doi.org/10.1130/G33041.1

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
67. ↵
    1. White J. D.,
    2. Montanez I. P.,
    3. Wilson J. P.,
    4. Poulsen C. J.,
    5. McElwain J. C.,
    6. DiMichele W. A.,
    7. Hren M.T.,
    8. Macarewich S.,
    9. Richey J. D.,
    10. Matthaeus W. J.

    , 2020, A process-based ecosystem model (paleo-bgc) to simulate the dynamic response of late Carboniferous plants to elvated O₂ and aridification: American Journal of Science, v. 320, n. 7, p.547–598, doi:https://doi.org/10.2475/09.2020.01

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
68. ↵
    1. Willis K. J.,
    2. McElwain J. C.

    , 2002, The evolution of plants: Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 378.