Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Special Volumes and Special Issue
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • FAQ
    • Terms & Conditions for use of AJS Online
  • Instructions to Authors
    • Focus and paper options
    • Submit your manuscript
  • Site Features
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Usage Statistics
    • RSS
  • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Science
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
American Journal of Science

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Special Volumes and Special Issue
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • FAQ
    • Terms & Conditions for use of AJS Online
  • Instructions to Authors
    • Focus and paper options
    • Submit your manuscript
  • Site Features
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Usage Statistics
    • RSS
  • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • The Journal
  • Follow ajs on Twitter
  • Visit ajs on Facebook
  • Follow ajs on Instagram
Research ArticleArticle

Paleo- to Mesoarchean crustal growth in the Karwar block, southern India: Constraints on TTG genesis and Archean tectonics

C. Ishwar-Kumar, K. Sajeev, M. Satish-Kumar, Ian S. Williams, Simon A. Wilde, T. Hokada and Brian F. Windley
American Journal of Science February 2022, 322 (2) 108-163; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2475/02.2022.02
C. Ishwar-Kumar
*Department of Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 208 016, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ishwar@iitk.ac.in krishnaisha@gmail.com
K. Sajeev
**Centre for Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Satish-Kumar
***Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ian S. Williams
§Research School of Earth Sciences, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon A. Wilde
§§School of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia 6102, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Hokada
§§§National Institute of Polar Research,10-3 Midori-cho, Tachikawa, Tokyo 190-8518, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian F. Windley
‡School of Geography, Geology and the Environment, The University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

In this study we present field relations, petrology, whole-rock major, trace and rare earth element geochemistry, zircon U-Pb ages, whole-rock Sr and Nd isotopes, and in situ zircon Hf and O isotopes from the Karwar block, western peninsular India. The rocks consist predominantly of tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite (TTG), granite and amphibolite. The felsic rocks are grouped into three: 1. TTG-I characterised by low K2O, high Na2O and Al2O3, low Sr/Y and La/Yb ratios, slightly enriched HREEs, negative Sr, Eu and Ti anomalies, a 3.2 Ga crystallisation age, and 3.60 Ga and 3.47 Ga inherited zircons; 2. TTG-II with lower SiO2, higher Sr/Y and La/Yb ratios, stronger REE fractionation with no HREE enrichment, negative Nb and Ta anomalies, a 3.2 Ga crystallisation age, but no inheritance; 3. Granites with high SiO2 and K2O, low Na2O and Al2O3, very low Sr/Y and La/Yb ratios, weak REE fractionation with enriched REEs, negative Sr, Eu and Ti anomalies and a 2.94 Ga crystallisation age. The TTG-I formed from a mantle source, but with a significant component of older crustal material, whereas the TTG-II originated mostly from a mantle-derived juvenile magma. The granite evolved from an enriched source containing a relatively large amount of older crustal material. The precursors of TTG-I and -II are similar to mid-ocean ridge basalts (MORB), whereas the granites are similar to volcanic arc/within-plate sources and the amphibolites are remnants of gabbros/basalts. An initial 3.6 Ga crust likely formed by the underplating of an accreted oceanic plateau-like or island arc-like crust. TTG-I was produced by subduction and slab melting at a moderate depth, induced melting of mafic lower crust and older upper crust at 3.2 Ga. TTG-II formed at 3.2 Ga by subduction and with a higher degree of slab melting at a greater depth than TTG-1, together with more effective mixing with mantle peridotite, followed by intrusion and induced melting of mafic lower crust. Basaltic magmatism at 3.0 Ga and subsequent metamorphism to amphibolite resulted in extensive and thicker crust. Assimilation and melting of TTG crust at a shallow depth during the emplacement of a mantle-derived magma produced the 2.94 Ga granites. The presence of inherited zircons, combined with whole-rock major and trace elements, Nd isotopes and in situ zircon Hf and O isotopes, indicates that older crustal material was incorporated into the source magma of TTG-I and that the Karwar block originally contained 3.60 to 3.47 Ga crust that was subsequently reworked during the Paleo- and Mesoarchean.

  • Karwar block
  • India
  • TTG
  • Amphibolite
  • Archean crustal growth
  • U-Pb geochronology
  • In situ Zircon Hf and O isotopes
  • Geochemistry
  • Sr and Nd isotopes
View Full Text

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Science: 322 (2)
American Journal of Science
Vol. 322, Issue 2
1 Feb 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Paleo- to Mesoarchean crustal growth in the Karwar block, southern India: Constraints on TTG genesis and Archean tectonics
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Paleo- to Mesoarchean crustal growth in the Karwar block, southern India: Constraints on TTG genesis and Archean tectonics
C. Ishwar-Kumar, K. Sajeev, M. Satish-Kumar, Ian S. Williams, Simon A. Wilde, T. Hokada, Brian F. Windley
American Journal of Science Feb 2022, 322 (2) 108-163; DOI: 10.2475/02.2022.02

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Paleo- to Mesoarchean crustal growth in the Karwar block, southern India: Constraints on TTG genesis and Archean tectonics
C. Ishwar-Kumar, K. Sajeev, M. Satish-Kumar, Ian S. Williams, Simon A. Wilde, T. Hokada, Brian F. Windley
American Journal of Science Feb 2022, 322 (2) 108-163; DOI: 10.2475/02.2022.02
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • REGIONAL GEOLOGY AND GEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND
    • FIELD RELATIONS AND PETROGRAPHY
    • SAMPLE PREPARATION AND ANALYSES
    • ANALYTICAL RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    • APPENDIX
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Assessing the long-term low-temperature thermal evolution of the central Indian Bundelkhand craton with a complex apatite and zircon (U-Th)/He dataset
  • The PATCH Lab v1.0: A database and workspace for Cenozoic terrestrial paleoclimate and environment reconstruction
  • Structure and thermochronology of basement/cover relations along the Defiance uplift (AZ and NM), and implications regarding Laramide tectonic evolution of the Colorado Plateau
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Karwar block
  • India
  • TTG
  • Amphibolite
  • Archean crustal growth
  • U-Pb geochronology
  • In situ Zircon Hf and O isotopes
  • Geochemistry
  • Sr and Nd isotopes

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Archive

More Information

  • RSS

Other Services

  • About Us

© 2023 American Journal of Science

Powered by HighWire