Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Special Volumes and Special Issue
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • FAQ
    • Terms & Conditions for use of AJS Online
  • Instructions to Authors
    • Focus and paper options
    • Submit your manuscript
  • Site Features
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Usage Statistics
    • RSS
  • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Science
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
American Journal of Science

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Special Volumes and Special Issue
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • FAQ
    • Terms & Conditions for use of AJS Online
  • Instructions to Authors
    • Focus and paper options
    • Submit your manuscript
  • Site Features
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Usage Statistics
    • RSS
  • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • The Journal
  • Follow ajs on Twitter
  • Visit ajs on Facebook
  • Follow ajs on Instagram

Table of Contents

December 01, 2022; Volume 322,Issue 10

Cover image

Cover image expansion

Cover Image Credits

The article by Colleps and others titled “Assessing the long-term low-temperature thermal evolution of the central Indian Bundelkhand craton with a complex apatite and zircon (U-Th)/He dataset” (p.1089–1123) explores the utility of modern techniques in thermochronology to unravel the burial and erosional evolution of the tectonically quiescent Bundelkhand craton of central India. Results from this study highlight both the capabilities and limitations of the radiation damage accumulation and annealing models for the zircon and apatite (U-Th)/He systems (ZHe and AHe, respectively). New detrital ZHe dates indicate that the Bundelkhand region has spent over 1.5 billion years at temperatures below ~200°C. Inverse and forward thermal history modelling from this study suggest that the Bundelkhand craton last experienced peak burial temperatures of 150°C between ~850–475 Ma followed by a prominent phase of crustal cooling from ~350–310 Ma, which was potentially driven by erosion associated with late Paleozoic glaciations. Thermal history modelling additionally suggests that low-damaged apatite and high-damaged zircon from the Bundelkhand region preserve a thermal overprint induced by Deccan Trap volcanism at ~66 Ma, which was likely responsible for an observed thermochronometric date inversion of >300 Myrs between the AHe and ZHe systems.

Explanation of cover figure: The photo in this figure shows the Sangrampur hillock preserved along the eastern margin of the Bundelkhand craton. Here, undeformed ~1.7–1.2 Ga Vindhyan deposits cap the hilltop and are in direct nonconformable contact with ~2.5 granites exposed along the hill slope. The plots below show a compilation of all zircon and apatite (U-Th)/He dates collected from the region and reveal distinct radiation damage-influenced date-eU relationships that were a primary focus of this study.

Back to top
Previous

In this issue

American Journal of Science: 322 (10)
American Journal of Science
Vol. 322, Issue 10
1 Dec 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Sign up for alerts
Entire Issue ($25)

Jump to

  • Article
  • Top Topics
  • Most Cited
  • Most Read
Loading

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Archive

More Information

  • RSS

Other Services

  • About Us

© 2023 American Journal of Science

Powered by HighWire