Research ArticleArticles

India in the Nuna to Gondwana supercontinent cycles: Clues from the north Indian and Marwar Blocks

Wei Wang, Peter A. Cawood and Manoj K. Pandit
American Journal of Science January 2021, 321 (1-2) 83-117; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2475/01.2021.02

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Acharyya S. K.
    , 2003, The Nature of Mesoproterozoic Central Indian Tectonic Zone with exhumed and reworked older granulites: Gondwana Research, v. 6, n. 2, p. 197–214, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1342-937X(05)70970-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Acharyya S. K.,
    2. Ghosh S.,
    3. Mandal N.,
    4. Bose S.,
    5. Pande K.
    , 2017, Pre-Himalayan tectono-magmatic imprints in the Darjeeling-Sikkim Himalaya (DSH) constrained by 40Ar/39Ar dating of muscovite: Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, v. 146, p. 211–220, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.05.027
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. Ahmad I.,
    2. Khan S.,
    3. Lapen T.,
    4. Burke K.,
    5. Jehan N.
    , 2013, Isotopic ages for alkaline igneous rocks, including a 26 Ma ignimbrite, from the Peshawar plain of northern Pakistan and their tectonic implications: Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, v. 62, p. 414–424, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.10.025
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  4. ↵
    1. Alessio B. L.,
    2. Blades M. L.,
    3. Murray G.,
    4. Thorpe B.,
    5. Collins A. S.,
    6. Kelsey D. E.,
    7. Foden J.,
    8. Payne J.,
    9. Al-Khirbash S.,
    10. Jourdan F.
    , 2018, Origin and tectonic evolution of the NE basement of Oman: A window into the Neoproterozoic accretionary growth of India?: Geological Magazine, v. 155, n. 5, p. 1150–1174, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0016756817000061
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Allen P. A.
    , 2007, The Huqf Supergroup of Oman: Basin development and context for Neoproterozoic glaciation: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 84, n. 3–4, p. 139–185, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2007.06.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  6. ↵
    1. Archibald D. B.,
    2. Collins A. S.,
    3. Foden J. D.,
    4. Payne J. L.,
    5. Holden P.,
    6. Razakamanana T.,
    7. De Waele B.,
    8. Thomas R. J.,
    9. Pitfield P. E. J.
    , 2016, Genesis of the Tonian Imorona–Itsindro magmatic Suite in central Madagascar: Insights from U–Pb, oxygen and hafnium isotopes in zircon: Precambrian Research, v. 281, p. 312–337, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2016.05.014
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Ashwal L. D.,
    2. Demaiffe D.,
    3. Torsvik T.
    , 2002, Petrogenesis of Neoproterozoic granitoids and related rocks from the Seychelles: The case for an Andean-type arc origin: Journal of Petrology, v. 43, n. 1, p. 45–83, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/petrology/43.1.45
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Ashwal L. D.,
    2. Solanki A. M.,
    3. Pandit M. K.,
    4. Corfu F.,
    5. Hendriks B. W. H.,
    6. Burke K.,
    7. Torsvik T. H.
    , 2013, Geochronology and geochemistry of Neoproterozoic Mt. Abu granitoids, NW India: Regional correlation and implications for Rodinia paleogeography: Precambrian Research, v. 236, p. 265–281, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2013.07.018
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  9. ↵
    1. Aspler L. B.,
    2. Chiarenzelli J. R.
    , 1998, Two Neoarchean supercontinents? Evidence from the Paleoproterozoic: Sedimentary Geology, v. 120, n. 1–4, p. 75–104, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0037-0738(98)00028-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Avigad D.,
    2. Gerdes A.,
    3. Morag N.,
    4. Bechstädt T.
    , 2012, Coupled U–Pb–Hf of detrital zircons of Cambrian sandstones from Morocco and Sardinia: Implications for provenance and Precambrian crustal evolution of North Africa: Gondwana Research, v. 21, n. 2–3, p. 690–703, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2011.06.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    1. Avigad D.,
    2. Weissbrod T.,
    3. Gerdes A.,
    4. Zlatkin O.,
    5. Ireland T. R.,
    6. Morag N.
    , 2015, The detrital zircon U–Pb–Hf fingerprint of the northern Arabian–Nubian Shield as reflected by a Late Ediacaran arkosic wedge (Zenifim Formation; subsurface Israel): Precambrian Research, v. 266, p. 1–11, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2015.04.011
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  12. ↵
    1. Awasthi A. K.,
    2. Parkash B.
    , 1981, Depositional environments of unfossiliferous sediments of the Jodhpur group, Western India: Sedimentary Geology, v. 30, n. 1–2, p. 15–42, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0037-0738(81)90012-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Azam M. S.,
    2. Khan M. S.,
    3. Raza M.
    , 2015, Petrogenetic study of Mesoproterozoic volcanic rocks of North Delhi fold belt, NW Indian shield: Implications for mantle conditions during Proterozoic: Chinese Journal of Geochemistry, v. 34, p. 93–114, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11631-014-0024-4
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. ↵
    1. Bauer W.,
    2. Walsh G. J.,
    3. de Waele B.,
    4. Thomas R. J.,
    5. Horstwood M. S. A.,
    6. Bracciali L.,
    7. Schofield D. I.,
    8. Wollenberg U.,
    9. Lidke D. J.,
    10. Rasaona I. T.,
    11. Rabarimanana M. H.
    , 2011, Cover sequences at the northern margin of the Antongil Craton, NE Madagascar: Precambrian Research, v. 189, n. 3–4, p. 292–312, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2011.07.018
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. Bhat M. I.,
    2. Le Fort P.
    , 1992, Sm-Nd age and petrogenesis of Rampur metavolcanic rocks, NW Himalayas: Late Archaean relics in the Himalayan belt: Precambrian Research, v. 56, n. 3–4, p. 191–210, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-9268(92)90101-S
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Bhattacharya A.,
    2. Das H. H.,
    3. Bell E.,
    4. Bhattacharya A.,
    5. Chatterjee N.,
    6. Saha L.,
    7. Dutt A.
    , 2016, Restoration of Late Neoarchean–Early Cambrian tectonics in the Rengali orogen and its environs (eastern India): The Antarctic connection: Lithos, v. 263, p. 190–212, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2016.06.006
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. Bhowmik S. K.,
    2. Bernhardt H.-J.,
    3. Dasgupta S.
    , 2010, Grenvillian age high-pressure upper amphibolite-granulite metamorphism in the Aravalli-Delhi Mobile Belt, Northwestern India: New evidence from monazite chemical age and its implication: Precambrian Research, v. 178, n. 1–4, p. 168–184, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2010.02.015
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. Bhowmik S. K.
    , 2019, The current status of orogenesis in the Central Indian Tectonic Zone: A view from its Southern Margin: Geological Journal, v. 54, n. 5, p. 2912–2934, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gj.3456
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    1. Bhowmik S. K.,
    2. Chakraborty S.
    , 2017, Sequential kinetic modelling: A new tool decodes pulsed tectonic patterns in early hot orogens of Earth: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 460, p. 171–179, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.12.018
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Bhowmik S. K.,
    2. Dasgupta S.
    , 2012, Tectonothermal evolution of the Banded Gneissic Complex in central Rajasthan, NW India: Present status and correlation: Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, v. 49, p. 339–348, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2011.07.025
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. Bhowmik S. K.,
    2. Wilde S. A.,
    3. Bhandari A.,
    4. Pal T.,
    5. Pant N. C.
    , 2012, Growth of the Greater Indian Landmass and its assembly in Rodinia: Geochronological evidence from the Central Indian Tectonic Zone: Gondwana Research, v. 22, n. 1, p. 54–72, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2011.09.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. Bhowmik S. K.,
    2. Wilde S. A.,
    3. Bhandari A.,
    4. Basu Sarbadhikari A.
    , 2014, Zoned monazite and zircon as monitors for the thermal history of granulite terranes: An Example from the Central Indian Tectonic Zone: Journal of Petrology, v. 55, n. 3, p. 585–621, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egt078
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  23. ↵
    1. Bhushan S. K.
    , 2000, Malani Rhyolites — A Review: Gondwana Research, v. 3, n. 1, p. 65–77, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1342-937X(05)70058-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    1. Bickford M. E.,
    2. Basu A.,
    3. Patranabis-Deb S.,
    4. Dhang P. C.,
    5. Schieber J.
    , 2011, Depositional History of the Chhattisgarh Basin, Central India: Constraints from New SHRIMP Zircon Ages: The Journal of Geology, v. 119, n. 1, p. 33–50, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/657300
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. Biju-Sekhar S.,
    2. Yokoyama K.,
    3. Pandit M. K.,
    4. Okudaira T.,
    5. Yoshida M.,
    6. Santosh M.
    , 2003, Late Paleoproterozoic magmatism in Delhi Fold Belt, NW India and its implication: Evidence from EPMA chemical ages of zircons: Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, v. 22, n. 2, p. 189–207, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1367-9120(02)00188-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Boger S. D.,
    2. Miller J. M.
    , 2004, Terminal suturing of Gondwana and the onset of the Ross–Delamerian Orogeny: The cause and effect of an Early Cambrian reconfiguration of plate motions: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 219, n. 1–2, p. 35–48, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(03)00692-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    1. Buick I. S.,
    2. Allen C.,
    3. Pandit M.,
    4. Rubatto D.,
    5. Hermann J.
    , 2006, The Proterozoic magmatic and metamorphic history of the Banded Gneiss Complex, central Rajasthan, India: LA-ICP-MS U–Pb zircon constraints: Precambrian Research, v. 151, n. 1–2, p. 119–142, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2006.08.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    1. Buick I. S.,
    2. Clark C.,
    3. Rubatto D.,
    4. Hermann J.,
    5. Pandit M.,
    6. Hand M.
    , 2010, Constraints on the Proterozoic evolution of the Aravalli–Delhi Orogenic belt (NW India) from monazite geochronology and mineral trace element geochemistry: Lithos, v. 120, n. 3–4, p. 511–528, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2010.09.011
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    1. Cawood P. A.,
    2. Buchan C.
    , 2007, Linking accretionary orogenesis with supercontinent assembly: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 82, n. 3–4, p. 217–256, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2007.03.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  30. ↵
    1. Cawood P. A.,
    2. Johnson M. R. W.,
    3. Nemchin A. A.
    , 2007, Early Palaeozoic orogenesis along the Indian margin of Gondwana: Tectonic response to Gondwana assembly: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 255, n. 1–2, p. 70–84, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2006.12.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    1. Cawood P. A.,
    2. Wang Y. J.,
    3. Xu Y. J.,
    4. Zhao G. C.
    , 2013, Locating South China in Rodinia and Gondwana: A fragment of greater India lithosphere?: Geology, v. 41, n. 8, p. 903–906, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1130/G34395.1
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Cawood P. A.,
    2. Strachan R. A.,
    3. Pisarevsky S. A.,
    4. Gladkochub D. P.,
    5. Murphy J. B.
    , 2016, Linking collisional and accretionary orogens during Rodinia assembly and breakup: Implications for models of supercontinent cycles: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 449, p. 118–126, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.05.049
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    1. Cawood P. A.,
    2. Hawkesworth C. J.,
    3. Pisarevsky S. A.,
    4. Dhuime B.,
    5. Capitanio F. A.,
    6. Nebel O.
    , 2018a, Geological archive of the onset of plate tectonics: Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society A–Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, v. 376, n. 2132, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0405
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. ↵
    1. Cawood P. A.,
    2. Zhao G. C.,
    3. Yao J. L.,
    4. Wang W.,
    5. Xu Y. J.,
    6. Wang Y. J.
    , 2018b, Reconstructing South China in Phanerozoic and Precambrian supercontinents: Earth Science Reviews, v. 186, p. 173–194, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.06.001
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. ↵
    1. Cawood P. A.,
    2. Wang W.,
    3. Zhao T.,
    4. Xu Y.,
    5. Mulder J. A.,
    6. Pisarevsky S. A.,
    7. Zhang L.,
    8. Gan C.,
    9. He H.,
    10. Liu H.,
    11. Qi L.,
    12. Wang Y.,
    13. Yao J.,
    14. Zhao G.,
    15. Zhou M.-F.,
    16. Zi J.-W.
    , 2020, Deconstructing South China and consequences for reconstructing Nuna and Rodinia: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 204, p. 103169, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103169
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. ↵
    1. Célérier J.,
    2. Harrison T. M.,
    3. Webb A. A. G.,
    4. Yin A.
    , 2009, The Kumaun and Garwhal Lesser Himalaya, India: Part 1. Structure and stratigraphy: GSA Bulletin, v. 121, n. 9–10, p. 1262–1280, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1130/B26344.1
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Chambers J. A.,
    2. Argles T. W.,
    3. Horstwood M. S. A.,
    4. Harris N. B. W.,
    5. Parrish R. R.,
    6. Ahmad T.
    , 2008, Tectonic implications of Palaeoproterozoic anatexis and Late Miocene metamorphism in the Lesser Himalayan Sequence, Sutlej Valley, NW India: Journal of the Geological Society, London, v. 165, n. 3, p. 725–737, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1144/0016-76492007/090
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Chatterjee S. M.,
    2. Roy Choudhury M.,
    3. Das S.,
    4. Roy A.
    , 2017, Significance and dynamics of the Neoproterozoic (810 Ma) Phulad Shear Zone, Rajasthan, NW India: Tectonics, v. 36, n. 8, p. 1432–1454, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2017TC004554
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. ↵
    1. Chatterjee S. M.,
    2. Sarkar A. K.,
    3. Roy A.,
    4. Manna A.
    , 2020, Mid‐Neoproterozoic Tectonics of Northwestern India: Evidence of Stitching Pluton along 810 Ma Phulad Shear Zone: Tectonics, v. 39, n. 1, p. e2019TC005902, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2019TC005902
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. ↵
    1. Chattopadhyay A.,
    2. Bhowmik S. K.,
    3. Roy A.
    , 2020, Tectonothermal evolution of the Central Indian Tectonic Zone and its implications for Proterozoic supercontinent assembly: The current status: Episodes, v. 43, n. 1, p. 132–144, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2020/020008
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. ↵
    1. Chattopadhyay S.,
    2. Upadhyay D.,
    3. Nanda J. K.,
    4. Mezger K.,
    5. Pruseth K. L.,
    6. Berndt J.
    , 2015, Proto-India was a part of Rodinia: Evidence from Grenville-age suturing of the Eastern Ghats Province with the Paleoarchean Singhbhum Craton: Precambrian Research, v. 266, p. 506–529, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2015.05.030
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  42. ↵
    1. Chen Q.,
    2. Sun M.,
    3. Long X.,
    4. Zhao G.,
    5. Wang J.,
    6. Yu Y.,
    7. Yuan C.
    , 2018, Provenance study for the Paleozoic sedimentary rocks from the west Yangtze Block: Constraint on possible link of South China to the Gondwana supercontinent reconstruction: Precambrian Research, v. 309, p. 271–289, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2017.01.022
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. ↵
    1. Chen Q.,
    2. Sun M.,
    3. Long X.,
    4. Zhao G.,
    5. Yuan C.
    , 2016, U–Pb ages and Hf isotopic record of zircons from the late Neoproterozoic and Silurian–Devonian sedimentary rocks of the western Yangtze Block: Implications for its tectonic evolution and continental affinity: Gondwana Research, v. 31, p. 184–199, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2015.01.009
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  44. ↵
    1. Chen W. T.,
    2. Zhou M. F.
    , 2012, Paragenesis, stable isotopes, and molybdenite Re-Os isotope age of the Lala iron-copper deposit, southwest China: Economic Geology, v. 107, n. 3, p. 459–480, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.2113/econgeo.107.3.459
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Chen W. T.,
    2. Zhou M.-F.,
    3. Zhao X.-F.
    , 2013, Late Paleoproterozoic sedimentary and mafic rocks in the Hekou area, SW China: Implication for the reconstruction of the Yangtze Block in Columbia: Precambrian Research, v. 231, p. 61–77, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2013.03.011
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  46. ↵
    1. Chen W. T.,
    2. Zhou M.-F.,
    3. Li X.,
    4. Gao J.-F.,
    5. Hou K.
    , 2015, In-situ LA-ICP-MS trace elemental analyses of magnetite: Cu-(Au, Fe) deposits in the Khetri copper belt in Rajasthan Province, NW India: Ore Geology Reviews, v. 65, Part 4, p. 929–939, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2014.09.035
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  47. ↵
    1. Chen Y.,
    2. Xu B.,
    3. Zhan S.,
    4. Li Y.
    , 2004, First mid-Neoproterozoic paleomagnetic results from the Tarim Basin (NW China) and their geodynamic implications: Precambrian Research, v. 133, n. 3, p. 271–281, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2004.05.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  48. ↵
    1. Chen Y. X.,
    2. Zheng Y. F.,
    3. Chen R. X.,
    4. Zhang S. B.,
    5. Li Q. l.,
    6. Dai M. N.,
    7. Chen L.
    , 2011, Metamorphic growth and recrystallization of zircons in extremely 18O-depleted rocks during eclogite-facies metamorphism: Evidence from U–Pb ages, trace elements, and O–Hf isotopes: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 75, n. 17, p. 4877–4898, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.06.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  49. ↵
    1. Choudhary A. K.,
    2. Gopalan K.,
    3. Sastry C. A.
    , 1984, Present status of the geochronology of the Precambrian rocks of Rajasthan: Tectonophysics, v. 105, n. 1–4, p. 131–140, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(84)90199-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  50. ↵
    1. Collins A. S.,
    2. Pisarevsky S. A.
    , 2005, Amalgamating eastern Gondwana: The evolution of the Circum-Indian Orogens: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 71, n. 3–4, p. 229–270, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2005.02.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  51. ↵
    1. Collins A. S.,
    2. Clark C.,
    3. Sajeev K.,
    4. Santosh M.,
    5. Kelsey D. E.,
    6. Hand M.
    , 2007, Passage through India: The Mozambique Ocean suture, high-pressure granulites and the Palghat-Cauvery shear zone system: Terra Nova, v. 19, n. 2, p. 141–147, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3121.2007.00729.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  52. ↵
    1. Collins A. S.,
    2. Clark C.,
    3. Plavsa D.
    , 2014, Peninsular India in Gondwana: The tectonothermal evolution of the Southern Granulite Terrain and its Gondwanan counterparts: Gondwana Research, v. 25, p. 190–203, doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2013.01.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  53. ↵
    1. Cozzi A.,
    2. Rea G.,
    3. Craig J.
    , 2012, From global geology to hydrocarbon exploration: Ediacaran-Early Cambrian petroleum plays of India, Pakistan and Oman: Geological Society, London, Special Publications, v. 366, p. 131–162, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1144/SP366.14
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. ↵
    1. D'Souza J.,
    2. Prabhakar N.,
    3. Xu Y.,
    4. Sharma K. K.,
    5. Sheth H.
    , 2019, Mesoarchaean to Neoproterozoic (3.2–0.8 Ga) crustal growth and reworking in the Aravalli Craton, northwestern India: Insights from the Pur-Banera supracrustal belt: Precambrian Research, v. 332, p. 105383, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2019.105383
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  55. ↵
    1. Das S.,
    2. Nasipuri P.,
    3. Bhattacharya A.,
    4. Swaminathan S.
    , 2008, The thrust-contact between the Eastern Ghats Belt and the adjoining Bastar craton (Eastern India): Evidence from mafic granulites and tectonic implications: Precambrian Research, v. 162, n. 1–2, p. 70–85, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2007.07.013
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  56. ↵
    1. Dasgupta S.,
    2. Bose S.,
    3. Das K.
    , 2013, Tectonic evolution of the Eastern Ghats Belt, India: Precambrian Research, v. 227, p. 247–258, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2012.04.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  57. ↵
    1. De Waele B.,
    2. Thomas R. J.,
    3. Macey P. H.,
    4. Horstwood M. S. A.,
    5. Tucker R. D.,
    6. Pitfield P. E. J.,
    7. Schofield D. I.,
    8. Goodenough K. M.,
    9. Bauer W.,
    10. Key R. M.,
    11. Potter C. J.,
    12. Armstrong R. A.,
    13. Miller J. A.,
    14. Randriamananjara T.,
    15. Ralison V.,
    16. Rafahatelo J. M.,
    17. Rabarimanana M.,
    18. Bejoma M.
    , 2011, Provenance and tectonic significance of the Palaeoproterozoic metasedimentary successions of central and northern Madagascar: Precambrian Research, v. 189, n. 1–2, p. 18–42, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2011.04.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  58. ↵
    1. de Wall H.,
    2. Pandit M. K.,
    3. Donhauser I.,
    4. Schöbel S.,
    5. Wang W.,
    6. Sharma K. K.
    , 2018, Evolution and tectonic setting of the Malani – Nagarparkar Igneous Suite: A Neoproterozoic Silicic-dominated Large Igneous Province in NW India-SE Pakistan: Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, v. 160, p. 136–158, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2018.04.016
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  59. ↵
    1. Deb M.,
    2. Thorpe R.
    , 2004, Geochronological constraints in the Precambrian geology of Rajasthan and their metallogenic implications: Sediment-Hosted Lead-Zinc Sulphide Deposits: New Delhi, India, Narosa Publishing House, p. 246–263.
  60. ↵
    1. Dharma Rao C. V.,
    2. Santosh M.,
    3. Purohit R.,
    4. Wang J.,
    5. Jiang X.,
    6. Kusky T.
    , 2011, LA-ICP-MS U–Pb zircon age constraints on the Paleoproterozoic and Neoarchean history of the Sandmata Complex in Rajasthan within the NW Indian Plate: Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, v. 42, n. 3, p. 286–305, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2011.01.018
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  61. ↵
    1. Dharma Rao C. V.,
    2. Santosh M.,
    3. Kim S. W.
    , 2012, Cryogenian volcanic arc in the NW Indian Shield: Zircon SHRIMP U–Pb geochronology of felsic tuffs and implications for Gondwana assembly: Gondwana Research, v. 22, n. 1, p. 36–53, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2011.10.014
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  62. ↵
    1. DiPietro J. A.,
    2. Isachsen C. E.
    , 2001, U-Pb zircon ages from the Indian plate in northwest Pakistan and their significance to Himalayan and pre-Himalayan geologic history: Tectonics, v. 20, n. 4, p. 510–525, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000TC001193
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  63. ↵
    1. Dobmeier C.,
    2. Lütke S.,
    3. Hammerschmidt K.,
    4. Mezger K.
    , 2006, Emplacement and deformation of the Vinukonda meta-granite (Eastern Ghats, India)—Implications for the geological evolution of peninsular India and for Rodinia reconstructions: Precambrian Research, v. 146, n. 3–4, p. 165–178, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2006.01.011
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  64. ↵
    1. Dong C. Y.,
    2. Cai L.,
    3. Wan Y. S.,
    4. Wei W.,
    5. Wu Y. W.,
    6. Xie H. Q.,
    7. Liu D. Y.
    , 2011, Detrital zircon age model of Ordovician Wenquan quartzite south of Lungmuco-Shuanghu Suture in the Qiangtang area, Tibet: Constraint on tectonic affinity and source regions: Science China-Earth Sciences, v. 54, p. 1034–1042, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11430-010-4166-x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  65. ↵
    1. Dong Y. P.,
    2. Liu X. M.,
    3. Santosh M.,
    4. Chen Q.,
    5. Zhang X. N.,
    6. Li W.,
    7. He D. F.,
    8. Zhang G. W.
    , 2012, Neoproterozoic accretionary tectonics along the northwestern margin of the Yangtze Block, China: Constraints from zircon U–Pb geochronology and geochemistry: Precambrian Research, v. 196–197, p. 247–274, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2011.12.007
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  66. ↵
    1. Duan L.,
    2. Meng Q.-R.,
    3. Zhang C.-L.,
    4. Liu X.-M.
    , 2011, Tracing the position of the South China block in Gondwana: U–Pb ages and Hf isotopes of Devonian detrital zircons: Gondwana Research, v. 19, n. 1, p. 141–149, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2010.05.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  67. ↵
    1. Estrada S.,
    2. Läufer A.,
    3. Eckelmann K.,
    4. Hofmann M.,
    5. Gärtner A.,
    6. Linnemann U.
    , 2016, Continuous Neoproterozoic to Ordovician sedimentation at the East Gondwana margin—Implications from detrital zircons of the Ross Orogen in northern Victoria Land, Antarctica: Gondwana Research, v. 37, p. 426–448, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2015.10.006
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  68. ↵
    1. Faryad S. W.,
    2. Collett S.,
    3. Finger F.,
    4. Sergeev S. A.,
    5. C˘opjaková R.,
    6. Siman P.
    , 2016, The Kabul Block (Afghanistan), a segment of the Columbia Supercontinent, with a Neoproterozoic metamorphic overprint: Gondwana Research, v. 34, p. 221–240, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2015.02.019
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  69. ↵
    1. Fu B.,
    2. Kita N. T.,
    3. Wilde S. A.,
    4. Liu X.,
    5. Cliff J.,
    6. Greig A.
    , 2013, Origin of the Tongbai-Dabie-Sulu Neoproterozoic low-δ 18O igneous province, east-central China: Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, v. 165, p. 641–662, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00410-012-0828-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  70. ↵
    1. Gehrels G. E.,
    2. DeCelles P. G.,
    3. Ojha T. P.,
    4. Upreti B. N.
    , 2006, Geologic and U-Th-Pb geochronologic evidence for early Paleozoic tectonism in the Kathmandu thrust sheet, central Nepal Himalaya: GSA Bulletin, v. 118, n. 1–2, p. 185–198, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1130/B25753.1
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  71. ↵
    1. Girard M.,
    2. Bussy F.
    , 1999, Late Pan-African magmatism in the Himalaya: new geochronological and geochemical data from the Ordovician Tso Morari metagranites (Ladakh, NW India): Schweizerische mineralogische und petrographische Mitteilungen, v. 79, p. 399–418.
    OpenUrl
  72. ↵
    1. Goodge J. W.,
    2. Williams I. S.,
    3. Myrow P.
    , 2004, Provenance of Neoproterozoic and lower Paleozoic siliciclastic rocks of the central Ross orogen, Antarctica: Detrital record of rift-, passive-, and active-margin sedimentation: GSA Bulletin, v. 116, n. 9–10, p. 1253–1279, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1130/B25347.1
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  73. ↵
    1. Gopalan K.,
    2. Macdougall J. D.,
    3. Roy A. B.,
    4. Murali A. V.
    , 1990, Sm-Nd evidence for 3.3 Ga old rocks in Rajasthan, northwestern India: Precambrian Research, v. 48, n. 1, p. 287–297, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-9268(90)90013-G
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  74. ↵
    1. Greentree M. R.,
    2. Li Z. X.
    , 2008, The oldest known rocks in south-western China: SHRIMP U-Pb magmatic crystallisation age and detrital provenance analysis of the Paleoproterozoic Dahongshan Group: Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, v. 33, n. 5–6, p. 289–302, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2008.01.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  75. ↵
    1. Gregory L. C.,
    2. Meert J. G.,
    3. Bingen B.,
    4. Pandit M. K.,
    5. Torsvik T. H.
    , 2009, Paleomagnetism and geochronology of the Malani Igneous Suite, Northwest India: Implications for the configuration of Rodinia and the assembly of Gondwana: Precambrian Research, v. 170, n. 1–2, p. 13–26, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2008.11.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  76. ↵
    1. Grew E. S.,
    2. Manton W. I.
    , 1986, A new correlation of sapphirine granulites in the indo-antarctic metamorphic terrain: Late proterozoic dates from the eastern ghats province of India: Precambrian Research, v. 33, n. 1–3, p. 123–137, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-9268(86)90018-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  77. ↵
    1. Guerot C.
    , 1993, Geochronological results in the Khetri copper belt (Rajasthan, India): APP2-BRGM report, R 36979 DEX, DMM-3.
  78. ↵
    1. Gupta B. C.
    , 1934, The geology of central Mewar: Memoir Geological Survey of India, v. 65, p. 107–168.
    OpenUrl
  79. ↵
    1. Han Y.,
    2. Zhao G.,
    3. Cawood P. A.,
    4. Sun M.,
    5. Eizenhöfer P. R.,
    6. Hou W.,
    7. Zhang X.,
    8. Liu Q.
    , 2016, Tarim and North China cratons linked to northern Gondwana through switching accretionary tectonics and collisional orogenesis: Geology, v. 44, n. 2, p. 95–98, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1130/G37399.1
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  80. ↵
    1. Handke M. J.,
    2. Tucker R. D.,
    3. Ashwal L. D.
    , 1999, Neoproterozoic continental arc magmatism in west-central Madagascar: Geology, v. 27, n. 4, p. 351–354, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1999)027<0351:NCAMIW>2.3.CO;2
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  81. ↵
    1. Yoshida M.,
    2. Windley B. F.,
    3. Dasgupta S.
    1. Harley S. L.
    , 2003, Archaean-Cambrian crustal development of East Antarctica: Metamorphic characteristics and tectonics implications, in Yoshida M., Windley B. F., Dasgupta S., editors, Proterozoic East Gondwana: Supercontinent Assembly and Breakup: Geological Society, London, Special Publications, v. 206, p. 203–230, doi:https://dx.doi.orghttps://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2003.206.01.11
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  82. ↵
    1. He X.-F.,
    2. Hand M.,
    3. Santosh M.,
    4. Kelsey D. E.,
    5. Morrissey L. J.,
    6. Tsunogae T.
    , 2018, Long-lived metamorphic P–T–t evolution of the Highland Complex, Sri Lanka: Insights from mafic granulites: Precambrian Research, v. 316, p. 227–243, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2018.08.008
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  83. ↵
    1. Heron A. M.
    , 1953, Geology of Central Rajputana: Geological Society of India, Bangalore, Memoirs, v. 79, p. 1–389.
    OpenUrl
  84. ↵
    1. Hofmann M.,
    2. Linnemann U.,
    3. Rai V.,
    4. Becker S.,
    5. Gärtner A.,
    6. Sagawe A.
    , 2011, The India and South China cratons at the margin of Rodinia—Synchronous Neoproterozoic magmatism revealed by LA-ICP-MS zircon analyses: Lithos, v. 123, n. 1–4, p. 176–187, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2011.01.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  85. ↵
    1. Horton F.,
    2. Leech M. L.
    , 2013, Age and origin of granites in the Karakoram shear zone and Greater Himalaya Sequence, NW India: Lithosphere, v. 5, n. 3, p. 300–320, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1130/L213.1
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  86. ↵
    1. Hou G. T.,
    2. Santosh M.,
    3. Qian X. L.,
    4. Lister G. S.,
    5. Li J. H.
    , 2008, Configuration of the Late Paleoproterozoic supercontinent Columbia: Insights from radiating mafic dyke swarms: Gondwana Research, v. 14, n. 3, p. 395–409, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2008.01.010
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  87. ↵
    1. Hu P.-y.,
    2. Zhai Q.-g.,
    3. Wang J.,
    4. Tang Y.,
    5. Wang H.-t.,
    6. Hou K.-j.
    , 2018, Precambrian origin of the North Lhasa terrane, Tibetan Plateau: Constraint from early Cryogenian back-arc magmatism: Precambrian Research, v. 313, p. 51–67, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2018.05.014
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  88. ↵
    1. Huang B.,
    2. Xu B.,
    3. Zhang C. Y.,
    4. Li Y.,
    5. Zhu R.
    , 2005, Paleomagnetism of the Baiyisi volcanic rocks (ca. 740 Ma) of Tarim, Northwest China: A continental fragment of Neoproterozoic Western Australia?: Precambrian Research, v. 142, n. 3–4, p. 83–92, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2005.09.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  89. ↵
    1. Jiang G. Q.,
    2. Sohl L. E.,
    3. Christie-Blick N.
    , 2003, Neoproterozoic stratigraphic comparison of the Lesser Himalaya (India) and Yangtze block (south China): Paleogeographic implications: Geology, v. 31, n. 10, p. 917–920, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1130/G19790.1
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  90. ↵
    1. Jöns N.,
    2. Schenk V.
    , 2008, Relics of the Mozambique Ocean in the central East African Orogen: Evidence from the Vohibory Block of southern Madagascar: Journal of Metamorphic Geology, v. 26, n. 1, p. 17–28, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1314.2007.00745.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  91. ↵
    1. Just J.,
    2. Schulz B.,
    3. de Wall H.,
    4. Jourdan F.,
    5. Pandit M. K.
    , 2011, Monazite CHIME/EPMA dating of Erinpura granitoid deformation: Implications for Neoproterozoic tectono-thermal evolution of NW India: Gondwana Research, v. 19, n. 2, p. 402–412, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2010.08.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  92. ↵
    1. Kaur P.,
    2. Zeh A.,
    3. Chaudhri N.,
    4. Gerdes A.,
    5. Okrusch M.
    , 2011, Archaean to Palaeoproterozoic crustal evolution of the Aravalli mountain range, NW India, and its hinterland: The U–Pb and Hf isotope record of detrital zircon: Precambrian Research, v. 187, n. 1–2, p. 155–164, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2011.03.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  93. ↵
    1. Kaur P.,
    2. Zeh A.,
    3. Chaudhri N.,
    4. Gerdes A.,
    5. Okrusch M.
    2013, Nature of magmatism and sedimentation at a Columbia active margin: Insights from combined U–Pb and Lu–Hf isotope data of detrital zircons from NW India: Gondwana Research, v. 23, n. 3, p. 1040–1052, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2012.07.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  94. ↵
    1. Kaur P.,
    2. Zeh A.,
    3. Chaudhri N.
    , 2017a, Palaeoproterozoic continental arc magmatism, and Neoproterozoic metamorphism in the Aravalli-Delhi orogenic belt, NW India: New constraints from in situ zircon U-Pb-Hf isotope systematics, monazite dating and whole-rock geochemistry: Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, v. 136, p. 68–88, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.01.024
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  95. ↵
    1. Kaur P.,
    2. Zeh A.,
    3. Chaudhri N.,
    4. Eliyas N.
    , 2017b, Two distinct sources of 1.73–1.70 Ga A-type granites from the northern Aravalli orogen, NW India: Constraints from in situ zircon U-Pb ages and Lu-Hf isotopes: Gondwana Research, v. 49, p. 164–181, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2017.05.012
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  96. ↵
    1. Kaur P.,
    2. Zeh A.,
    3. Chaudhri N.
    , 2019a, Archean crustal evolution of the Aravalli Banded Gneissic Complex, NW India: Constraints from zircon U-Pb ages, Lu-Hf isotope systematics, and whole-rock geochemistry of granitoids: Precambrian Research, v. 327, p. 81–102, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2019.03.004
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  97. ↵
    1. Kaur P.,
    2. Zeh A.,
    3. Chaudhri N.
    2019b, U–Pb age and Hf isotope record of detrital zircon grains from the North Delhi Supergroup, NW India: Implications for provenance and stratigraphic correlations: International Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 108, p. 2683–2697, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00531-019-01782-y
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  98. ↵
    1. Kaur P.,
    2. Zeh A.,
    3. Chaudhri N.,
    4. Tiwana J. K.
    , 2020, First evidence of Late Paleoproterozoic/Early Mesoproterozoic sediment deposition and magmatism in the Central Aravalli Orogen (NW India): The Journal of Geology, v. 128, n. 2, p. 109–129, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/707235
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  99. ↵
    1. Khan M. S.,
    2. Irshad R.,
    3. Khan T.
    , 2019, Geochemistry of Mafic–Felsic Rocks of Phulad Ophiolite, in and Around Pindwara-Mount Abu Region, South Delhi Fold Belt, NW Indian Shield: Implications for Its Tectonic Evolution, Geological Evolution of the Precambrian Indian Shield: Cham, Switzerland, Springer, Society of Earth Scientists Series, p. 401–441, doi:https://dx.doi.orghttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89698-4_17
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  100. ↵
    1. Kohn M. J.,
    2. Paul S. K.,
    3. Corrie S. L.
    , 2010, The lower Lesser Himalayan sequence: A Paleoproterozoic arc on the northern margin of the Indian plate: GSA Bulletin, v. 122, n. 3–4, p. 323–335, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1130/B26587.1
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  101. ↵
    1. Kolodner K.,
    2. Avigad D.,
    3. Mcwilliams M.,
    4. Wooden J. L.,
    5. Weissbrod T.,
    6. Feinstein S.
    , 2006, Provenance of north Gondwana Cambrian–Ordovician sandstone: U–Pb SHRIMP dating of detrital zircons from Israel and Jordan: Geological Magazine, v. 143, n. 3, p. 367–391, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0016756805001640
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  102. ↵
    1. Kröner A.,
    2. Windley B. F.,
    3. Jaeckel P.,
    4. Brewer T. S.,
    5. Razakamanana T.
    , 1999, New zircon ages and regional significance for the evolution of the Pan-African orogen in Madagascar: Journal of the Geological Society, v. 156, p. 1125–1135, doi:https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.156.6.1125
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  103. ↵
    1. Kroener A.,
    2. Hegner E.,
    3. Collins A.,
    4. Windley B.,
    5. Brewer T.,
    6. Razakamanana T.,
    7. Pidgeon R.
    , 2000, Age and magmatic history of the Antananarivo Block, central Madagascar, as derived from zircon geochronology and Nd isotopic systematics: American Journal of Science, v. 300, n. 4, p. 251–288, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.2475/ajs.300.4.251
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  104. ↵
    1. Kröner A.,
    2. Cordani U.
    , 2003, African, southern Indian and South American cratons were not part of the Rodinia supercontinent: Evidence from field relationships and geochronology: Tectonophysics, v. 375, n. 1–4, p. 325–352, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(03)00344-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  105. ↵
    1. Kröner A.,
    2. Muhongo S.,
    3. Hegner E.,
    4. Wingate M. T. D.
    , 2003, Single-zircon geochronology and Nd isotopic systematics of Proterozoic high-grade rocks from the Mozambique belt of southern Tanzania (Masasi area): Implications for Gondwana assembly: Journal of the Geological Society, v. 160, n. 5, p. 745–757, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1144/0016-764901-170
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  106. ↵
    1. Ksienzyk A. K.,
    2. Jacobs J.,
    3. Boger S. D.,
    4. Košler J.,
    5. Sircombe K. N.,
    6. Whitehouse M. J.
    , 2012, U–Pb ages of metamorphic monazite and detrital zircon from the Northampton Complex: Evidence of two orogenic cycles in Western Australia: Precambrian Research, v. 198–199, p. 37–50, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2011.12.011
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  107. ↵
    1. Kumar R.
    , 1985, Fundamentals of historical geology and stratigraphic of India: New Delhi, India, Wiley Eastern Limited, p. 81–803.
  108. ↵
    1. Kumar S.,
    2. Pandey S. K.
    , 2010, Trace fossils from the Nagaur Sandstone, Marwar Supergroup, Dulmera area, Bikaner district, Rajasthan, India: Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, v. 38, n. 3–4, p. 77–85, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2009.10.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  109. ↵
    1. Kumar G.,
    2. Raina B. K.,
    3. Bhargava O. N.,
    4. Maithy P. K.,
    5. Babu R.
    , 1984, The Precambrian–Cambrian boundary problem and its prospects, Northwest Himalaya, India: Geological Magazine, v. 121, n. 3, p. 211–219, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0016756800028272
    OpenUrlAbstract
  110. ↵
    1. Kusky T. M.,
    2. Abdelsalam M.,
    3. Tucker R. D.,
    4. Stern R. J.
    , 2003, Evolution of the East African and related orogens, and the assembly of Gondwana: Precambrian Research, v. 123, n. 2–4, p. 81–85, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(03)00062-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  111. ↵
    1. Lan Z.,
    2. Zhang S.,
    3. Li X.-H.,
    4. Pandey S. K.,
    5. Sharma M.,
    6. Shukla Y.,
    7. Ahmad S.,
    8. Sarkar S.,
    9. Zhai M.
    , 2020, Towards resolving the ‘jigsaw puzzle’ and age-fossil inconsistency within East Gondwana: Precambrian Research, v. 345, p. 105775, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2020.105775
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  112. ↵
    1. Le Fort P.
    , 1986, The 500 Ma magmatic event in Alpine southern Asia, a thermal episode at Gondwana scale: Evolution des Domaines Orogeniques d'Asie Meridionale, v. 47, p. 191–209.
    OpenUrl
  113. ↵
    1. Lee J.,
    2. Whitehouse M. J.
    , 2007, Onset of mid-crustal extensional flow in southern Tibet: Evidence from U/Pb zircon ages: Geology, v. 35, n. 1, p. 45–48, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1130/G22842A.1
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  114. ↵
    1. Li H. K.,
    2. Zhang C. L.,
    3. Yao C. Y.,
    4. Xiang Z. Q.
    , 2013, U-Pb zircon age and Hf isotope compositions of Mesoproterozoic sedimentary strata on the western margin of the Yangtze massif: Science China Earth Sciences, v. 56, p. 628–639, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11430-013-4590-9
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  115. ↵
    1. Li J. Y.
    , 2006, Permian geodynamic setting of Northeast China and adjacent regions: Closure of the Paleo-Asian Ocean and subduction of the Paleo-Pacific Plate: Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, v. 26, n. 3–4, p. 207–224, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2005.09.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  116. ↵
    1. Li X. C.,
    2. Zhou M. F.,
    3. Williams-Jones A.,
    4. Yang Y.-H.,
    5. Gao J.-F.
    , 2018, Timing and genesis of Cu–(Au) mineralization in the Khetri Copper Belt, northwestern India: Constraints from in situ U–Pb ages and Sm–Nd isotopes of monazite-(Ce): Mineralium Deposita, v. 54, p. 553–568, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00126-018-0823-3
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  117. ↵
    1. Li X. H.
    , 1997, Timing of the Cathaysia Block formation: Constraints from SHRIMP U–Pb zircon geochronology: Episodes, v. 20, n. 3, p. 188–192, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/1997/v20i3/008
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  118. ↵
    1. Li Y.,
    2. Zhang T.,
    3. Shao D.,
    4. Shen B.
    , 2019, New U-Pb zircon age and carbon isotope records from the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation on the Yangtze Platform, South China: Implications for stratigraphic correlation and environmental change: Chemical Geology, v. 509, p. 249–260, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.02.003
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  119. ↵
    1. Li Y. H.,
    2. Zheng J. P.,
    3. Xiong Q.,
    4. Wang W.,
    5. Ping X. Q.,
    6. Li X. Y.,
    7. Tang H. Y.
    , 2016, Petrogenesis and tectonic implications of Paleoproterozoic metapelitic rocks in the Archean Kongling Complex from the northern Yangtze Craton, South China: Precambrian Research, v. 276, p. 158–177, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2016.01.028
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  120. ↵
    1. Li Z. X.,
    2. Bogdanova S. V.,
    3. Collins A. S.,
    4. Davidson A.,
    5. De Waele B.,
    6. Ernst R. E.,
    7. Fitzsimons I. C. W.,
    8. Fuck R. A.,
    9. Gladkochub D. P.,
    10. Jacobs J.,
    11. Karlstrom K. E.,
    12. Lu S.,
    13. Natapov L. M.,
    14. Pease V.,
    15. Pisarevsky S. A.,
    16. Thrane K.,
    17. Vernikovsky V.
    , 2008, Assembly, configuration, and break-up history of Rodinia: A synthesis: Precambrian Research, v. 160, n. 1–2, p. 179–210, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2007.04.021
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  121. ↵
    1. Linnemann U.,
    2. Ouzegane K.,
    3. Drareni A.,
    4. Hofmann M.,
    5. Becker S.,
    6. Gärtner A.,
    7. Sagawe A.
    , 2011, Sands of West Gondwana: An archive of secular magmatism and plate interactions — A case study from the Cambro-Ordovician section of the Tassili Ouan Ahaggar (Algerian Sahara) using U–Pb–LA-ICP-MS detrital zircon ages: Lithos, v. 123, n. 3–4, p. 188–203, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2011.01.010
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  122. ↵
    1. Liu C.,
    2. Zhao G.,
    3. Liu F.
    , 2014a, Detrital zircon U–Pb, Hf isotopes, detrital rutile and whole-rock geochemistry of the Huade Group on the northern margin of the North China Craton: Implications on the breakup of the Columbia supercontinent: Precambrian Research, v. 254, p. 290–305, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2014.09.011
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  123. ↵
    1. Liu J. B.,
    2. Zhang L. M.
    , 2013, Neoproterozoic low to negative δ18O volcanic and intrusive rocks in the Qinling Mountains and their geological significance: Precambrian Research, v. 230, p. 138–167, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2013.02.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  124. ↵
    1. Liu Q.,
    2. Yu J.-H.,
    3. O'Reilly S. Y.,
    4. Zhou M.-F.,
    5. Griffin W. L.,
    6. Wang L.,
    7. Cui X.
    , 2014b, Origin and geological significance of Paleoproterozoic granites in the northeastern Cathaysia Block, South China: Precambrian Research, v. 248, p. 72–95, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2014.04.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  125. ↵
    1. Long S.,
    2. McQuarrie N.,
    3. Tobgay T.,
    4. Rose C.,
    5. Gehrels G.,
    6. Grujic D.
    , 2011, Tectonostratigraphy of the Lesser Himalaya of Bhutan: Implications for the along-strike stratigraphic continuity of the northern Indian margin: GSA Bulletin, v. 123, n. 7–8, p. 1406–1426, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1130/B30202.1
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  126. ↵
    1. Luo L.,
    2. Zeng L.,
    3. Wang K.,
    4. Yu X.,
    5. Li Y.,
    6. Zhu C.,
    7. Liu S.
    , 2020, Provenance investigation for the Cambrian–Ordovician strata from the northern margin of the western Yangtze Block: Implications for locating the South China Block in Gondwana: Geological Magazine, v. 157, n. 4, p. 551–572, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0016756819001110
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  127. ↵
    1. Ma M.,
    2. Zhang Y.,
    3. Xie H.,
    4. Wan Y.
    , 2014, SHRIMP U-Pb dating and LA-ICPMS Hf isotope analysis of detrital zircons from medium- to coarse-grained sandstones of the Bayan Obo Group and Sailinhudong Group and its geological significances: Acta Petrologica Sinica, v. 30, p. 2973–2988 (in Chinese with English abstract).
    OpenUrl
  128. ↵
    1. Maheshwari A.,
    2. Sial A. N.,
    3. Gaucher C.,
    4. Bossi J.,
    5. Bekker A.,
    6. Ferreira V. P.,
    7. Romano A. W.
    , 2010, Global nature of the Paleoproterozoic Lomagundi carbon isotope excursion: A review of occurrences in Brazil, India, and Uruguay: Precambrian Research, v. 182, n. 4, p. 274–299, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2010.06.017
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  129. ↵
    1. Malone S. J.,
    2. Meert J. G.,
    3. Banerjee D. M.,
    4. Pandit M. K.,
    5. Tamrat E.,
    6. Kamenov G. D.,
    7. Pradhan V. R.,
    8. Sohl L. E.
    , 2008, Paleomagnetism and detrital zircon geochronology of the Upper Vindhyan sequence, Son Valley and Rajasthan, India: A ca. 1000 Ma closure age for the Purana basins?: Precambrian Research, v. 164, n. 3–4, p. 137–159, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2008.04.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  130. ↵
    1. Mandal S.
    , ms, 2014, Structural, kinematic and geochronological evolution of the Himalayan fold-thrust belt in Kumaun, Uttaranchal, Northwest India: Tuscaloosa, Alabama, University of Alabama, Ph. D. dissertation, 169 p., https://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/2243
  131. ↵
    1. Mandal S.,
    2. Robinson D. M.,
    3. Kohn M. J.,
    4. Khanal S.,
    5. Das O.,
    6. Bose S.
    , 2016, Zircon U-Pb ages and Hf isotopes of the Askot klippe, Kumaun, northwest India: Implications for Paleoproterozoic tectonics, basin evolution and associated metallogeny of the northern Indian cratonic margin: Tectonics, v. 35, n. 4, p. 965–982, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015TC004064
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  132. ↵
    1. Markwitz V.,
    2. Kirkland C. L.,
    3. Wyrwoll K. H.,
    4. Hancock E. A.,
    5. Evans N. J.,
    6. Lu Y.
    , 2017, Variations in zircon provenance constrain age and geometry of an Early Paleozoic rift in the Pinjarra Orogen, East Gondwana: Tectonics, v. 36, n. 11, p. 2477–2496, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2017TC004696
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  133. ↵
    1. Martin A. J.
    , 2017, A review of Himalayan stratigraphy, magmatism, and structure: Gondwana Research, v. 49, p. 42–80, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2017.04.031
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  134. ↵
    1. Martin A. J.,
    2. DeCelles P. G.,
    3. Gehrels G. E.,
    4. Patchett P. J.,
    5. Isachsen C.
    , 2005, Isotopic and structural constraints on the location of the Main Central thrust in the Annapurna Range, central Nepal Himalaya: GSA Bulletin, v. 117, n. 7–8, p. 926–944, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1130/B25646.1
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  135. ↵
    1. Mazumdar A.,
    2. Strauss H.
    , 2006, Sulfur and strontium isotopic compositions of carbonate and evaporite rocks from the late Neoproterozoic–early Cambrian Bilara Group (Nagaur-Ganganagar Basin, India): Constraints on intrabasinal correlation and global sulfur cycle: Precambrian Research, v. 149, n. 3–4, p. 217–230, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2006.06.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  136. ↵
    1. McKenzie N. R.,
    2. Hughes N. C.,
    3. Myrow P. M.,
    4. Choi D. K.,
    5. Park T.-y.
    , 2011a, Trilobites and zircons link north China with the eastern Himalaya during the Cambrian: Geology, v. 39, n. 6, p. 591–594, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1130/G31838.1
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  137. ↵
    1. McKenzie N. R.,
    2. Hughes N. C.,
    3. Myrow P. M.,
    4. Xiao S.,
    5. Sharma M.
    , 2011b, Correlation of Precambrian–Cambrian sedimentary successions across northern India and the utility of isotopic signatures of Himalayan lithotectonic zones: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 312, n. 3–4, p. 471–483, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.10.027
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  138. ↵
    1. McKenzie N. R.,
    2. Hughes N. C.,
    3. Myrow P. M.,
    4. Banerjee D. M.,
    5. Deb M.,
    6. Planavsky N. J.
    , 2013, New age constraints for the Proterozoic Aravalli–Delhi successions of India and their implications: Precambrian Research, v. 238, p. 120–128, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2013.10.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  139. ↵
    1. McQuarrie N.,
    2. Robinson D.,
    3. Long S.,
    4. Tobgay T.,
    5. Grujic D.,
    6. Gehrels G.,
    7. Ducea M.
    , 2008, Preliminary stratigraphic and structural architecture of Bhutan: Implications for the along strike architecture of the Himalayan system: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 272, n. 1–2, p. 105–117, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.04.030
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  140. ↵
    1. Meert J. G.
    , 2003, A synopsis of events related to the assembly of eastern Gondwana: Tectonophysics, v. 362, n. 1–4, p. 1–40, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(02)00629-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  141. ↵
    1. Meert J. G.,
    2. Torsvik T. H.
    , 2003, The making and unmaking of a supercontinent: Rodinia revisited: Tectonophysics, v. 375, n. 1–4, p. 261–288, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(03)00342-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  142. ↵
    1. Meert J. G.,
    2. Pandit M. K.
    , 2015, The Archaean and Proterozoic history of Peninsular India: Tectonic framework for Precambrian sedimentary basins in India: Geological Society, London, Memoirs, v. 43, p. 29–54, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1144/M43.3
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  143. ↵
    1. Meert J. G.,
    2. Pandit M. K.,
    3. Pradhan V. R.,
    4. Banks J.,
    5. Sirianni R.,
    6. Stroud M.,
    7. Newstead B.,
    8. Gifford J.
    , 2010, Precambrian crustal evolution of Peninsular India: A 3.0 billion year odyssey: Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, v. 39, n. 6, p. 483–515, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.04.026
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  144. ↵
    1. Meert J. G.,
    2. Pandit M. K.,
    3. Pradhan V. R.,
    4. Kamenov G.
    , 2011, Preliminary report on the paleomagnetism of 1.88 Ga dykes from the Bastar and Dharwar cratons, Peninsular India: Gondwana Research, v. 20, n. 2–3, p. 335–343, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2011.03.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  145. ↵
    1. Meert J. G.,
    2. Pandit M. K.,
    3. Kamenov G. D.
    , 2013, Further geochronological and paleomagnetic constraints on Malani (and pre-Malani) magmatism in NW India: Tectonophysics, v. 608, p. 1254–1267, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2013.06.019
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  146. ↵
    1. Meinhold G.,
    2. Morton A. C.,
    3. Fanning C. M.,
    4. Frei D.,
    5. Howard J. P.,
    6. Phillips R. J.,
    7. Strogen D.,
    8. Whitham A. G.
    , 2011, Evidence from detrital zircons for recycling of Mesoproterozoic and Neoproterozoic crust recorded in Paleozoic and Mesozoic sandstones of southern Libya: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 312, n. 1–2, p. 164–175, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.09.056
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  147. ↵
    1. Meinhold G.,
    2. Morton A. C.,
    3. Avigad D.
    , 2013, New insights into peri-Gondwana paleogeography and the Gondwana super-fan system from detrital zircon U–Pb ages: Gondwana Research, v. 23, n. 2, p. 661–665, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2012.05.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  148. ↵
    1. Merdith A. S.,
    2. Collins A. S.,
    3. Williams S. E.,
    4. Pisarevsky S.,
    5. Foden J. D.,
    6. Archibald D. B.,
    7. Blades M. L.,
    8. Alessio B. L.,
    9. Armistead S.,
    10. Plavsa D.,
    11. Clark C.,
    12. Müller R. D.
    , 2017, A full-plate global reconstruction of the Neoproterozoic: Gondwana Research, v. 50, p. 84–134, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2017.04.001
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  149. ↵
    1. Meschede M.
    , 1986, A method of discriminating between different types of mid-ocean ridge basalts and continental tholeiites with the Nb-Zr-Y diagram: Chemical Geology, v. 56, n. 3–4, p. 207–218, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(86)90004-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  150. ↵
    1. Metcalfe I.
    , 2009, Late Palaeozoic and Mesozoic tectonic and palaeogeographical evolution of SE Asia: Geological Society, London, Special Publications, v. 315, p. 7–23, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1144/SP315.2
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  151. ↵
    1. Metcalfe I.
    2013, Gondwana dispersion and Asian accretion: Tectonic and palaeogeographic evolution of eastern Tethys: Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, v. 66, p. 1–33, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.12.020
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  152. ↵
    1. Miller C.,
    2. Klötzli U.,
    3. Frank W.,
    4. Thöni M.,
    5. Grasemann B.
    , 2000, Proterozoic crustal evolution in the NW Himalaya (India) as recorded by circa 1.80 Ga mafic and 1.84 Ga granitic magmatism: Precambrian Research, v. 103, n. 3–4, p. 191–206, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(00)00091-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  153. ↵
    1. Miller C.,
    2. Thöni M.,
    3. Frank W.,
    4. Grasemann B.,
    5. Klötzli U.,
    6. Guntli P.,
    7. Draganits E.
    , 2001, The early Palaeozoic magmatic event in the Northwest Himalaya, India: Source, tectonic setting and age of emplacement: Geological Magazine, v. 138, n. 3, p. 237–251, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0016756801005283
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  154. ↵
    1. Mohan M. R.,
    2. Singh S. P.,
    3. Santosh M.,
    4. Siddiqui M. A.,
    5. Balaram V.
    , 2012, TTG suite from the Bundelkhand Craton, Central India: Geochemistry, petrogenesis and implications for Archean crustal evolution: Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, v. 58, p. 38–50, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.07.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  155. ↵
    1. Mohanty S.
    , 2010, Tectonic evolution of the Satpura Mountain Belt: A critical evaluation and implication on supercontinent assembly: Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, v. 39, n. 6, p. 516–526, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.04.025
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  156. ↵
    1. Mondal M. E. A.,
    2. Goswami J. N.,
    3. Deomurari M. P.,
    4. Sharma K. K.
    , 2002, Ion microprobe 207Pb/206Pb ages of zircons from the Bundelkhand massif, northern India: Implications for crustal evolution of the Bundelkhand-Aravalli protocontinent: Precambrian Research, v. 117, n. 1–2, p. 85–100, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(02)00078-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  157. ↵
    1. Myrow P. M.,
    2. Hughes N. C.,
    3. Goodge J. W.,
    4. Fanning C. M.,
    5. Williams I. S.,
    6. Peng S.,
    7. Bhargava O. N.,
    8. Parcha S. K.,
    9. Pogue K. R.
    , 2010, Extraordinary transport and mixing of sediment across Himalayan central Gondwana during the Cambrian-Ordovician: GSA Bulletin, v. 122, n. 9–10, p. 1660–1670, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1130/B30123.1
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  158. ↵
    1. Myrow P. M.,
    2. Hughes N. C.,
    3. McKenzie N. R.,
    4. Pelgay P.,
    5. Thomson T. J.,
    6. Haddad E. E.,
    7. Fanning C. M.
    , 2016, Cambrian–Ordovician orogenesis in Himalayan equatorial Gondwana: GSA Bulletin, v. 128, n. 11–12, p. 1679–1695, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1130/B31507.1
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  159. ↵
    1. Myrow P. M.,
    2. Hughes N. C.,
    3. Searle M. P.,
    4. Fanning C. M.,
    5. Peng S.-C.,
    6. Parcha S. K.
    , 2009, Stratigraphic correlation of Cambrian–Ordovician deposits along the Himalaya: Implications for the age and nature of rocks in the Mount Everest region: GSA Bulletin, v. 121, p. 323–332, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1130/B26384.1
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  160. ↵
    1. Naqvi S. M.
    , 2005, Geology and evolution of the Indian plate: From Hadean to Holocene, 4 Ga to 4 Ka: New Delhi, India, Capital Publishing Company, 450 p.
  161. ↵
    1. Naqvi S. M.,
    2. Rogers J. J. W.
    , 1987, Precambrian geology of India: New York, Oxford University Press, Oxford Monographs on Geology and Geophysics, n. 6, 223 p.
  162. ↵
    1. Palin R. M.,
    2. Treloar P. J.,
    3. Searle M. P.,
    4. Wald T.,
    5. White R. W.,
    6. Mertz-Kraus R.
    , 2018, U-Pb monazite ages from the Pakistan Himalaya record pre-Himalayan Ordovician orogeny and Permian continental breakup: GSA Bulletin, v. 130, n. 11–12, p. 2047–2061, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1130/B31943.1
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  163. ↵
    1. Pan G.,
    2. Ding J.,
    3. Yao D.,
    4. Wang L.
    , 2004, Guidebook of 1:1 500 000 geologic map of the Qinghai-Xizang (Tibet) plateau and adjacent areas: Chengdu, China, Chengdu Cartographic Publishing House, 48 p.
  164. ↵
    1. Pandit M. K.,
    2. Sial A. N.,
    3. Jamrani S. S.,
    4. Ferreira V. P.
    , 2001, Carbon isotopic profile across the Bilara Group Rocks of Trans-Aravalli Marwar Supergroup in Western India: Implications for Neoproterozoic — Cambrian Transition: Gondwana Research, v. 4, n. 3, p. 387–394, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1342-937X(05)70338-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  165. ↵
    1. Pandit M. K.,
    2. Carter L. M.,
    3. Ashwal L. D.,
    4. Tucker R. D.,
    5. Torsvik T. H.,
    6. Jamtveit B.,
    7. Bhushan S. K.
    , 2003, Age, petrogenesis and significance of 1.0 Ga granitoids and related rocks from the Sendra area, Aravalli Craton, NW India: Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, v. 22, n. 4, p. 363–381, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1367-9120(03)00070-1
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  166. ↵
    1. Pant N. C.,
    2. Kundu A.,
    3. Joshi S.
    , 2008, Age of metamorphism of Delhi supergroup rocks—electron microprobe ages from Mahendragarh district, Haryana: Journal of Geological Society of India, v. 72, p. 365–372.
    OpenUrl
  167. ↵
    1. Parrish R. R.,
    2. Hodges V.
    , 1996, Isotopic constraints on the age and provenance of the Lesser and Greater Himalayan sequences, Nepalese Himalaya: GSA Bulletin, v. 108, n. 7, p. 904–911, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1996)108<0904:ICOTAA>2.3.CO;2
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  168. ↵
    1. Pati J. K.,
    2. Raju S.,
    3. Mamgain V. D.,
    4. Shankar R.
    , 1997, Gold mineralization in parts of Bundelkhand Granitoid Complex (BGC): Journal of the Geological Society of India, v. 50, p. 601–606.
    OpenUrlGeoRef
  169. ↵
    1. Paulsen T. S.,
    2. Encarnación J.,
    3. Grunow A. M.,
    4. Valencia V. A.,
    5. Layer P. W.,
    6. Pecha M.,
    7. Stump E.,
    8. Roeske S.,
    9. Thao S.,
    10. Rasoazanamparany C.
    , 2015, Detrital mineral ages from the Ross Supergroup, Antarctica: Implications for the Queen Maud terrane and outboard sediment provenance on the Gondwana margin: Gondwana Research, v. 27, n. 1, p. 377–391, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2013.10.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  170. ↵
    1. Paulsen T. S.,
    2. Deering C.,
    3. Sliwinski J.,
    4. Bachmann O.,
    5. Guillong M.
    , 2016, Detrital zircon ages from the Ross Supergroup, north Victoria Land, Antarctica: Implications for the tectonostratigraphic evolution of the Pacific-Gondwana margin: Gondwana Research, v. 35, p. 79–96, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2016.04.001
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  171. ↵
    1. Paulsen T.,
    2. Deering C.,
    3. Sliwinski J.,
    4. Bachmann O.,
    5. Guillong M.
    , 2017, New detrital zircon age and trace element evidence for 1450 Ma igneous zircon sources in East Antarctica: Precambrian Research, v. 300, p. 53–58, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2017.07.011
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  172. ↵
    1. Phukon P.,
    2. Koushik S.,
    3. Srivastava H. B. S.,
    4. Singhal S.,
    5. Sen A.
    , 2018, U-Pb geochronology and geochemistry from the Kumaun Himalaya, NW India, reveal Paleoproterozoic arc magmatism related to formation of the Columbia supercontinent: GSA Bulletin, v. 130, n. 7–8, p. 1164–1176, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1130/B31866.1
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  173. ↵
    1. Pisarevsky S. A.,
    2. Biswal T. K.,
    3. Wang X.-C.,
    4. De Waele B.,
    5. Ernst R.,
    6. Söderlund U.,
    7. Tait J. A.,
    8. Ratre K.,
    9. Singh Y. K.,
    10. Cleve M.
    , 2013, Palaeomagnetic, geochronological and geochemical study of Mesoproterozoic Lakhna Dykes in the Bastar Craton, India: Implications for the Mesoproterozoic supercontinent: Lithos, v. 174, p. 125–143, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2012.07.015
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  174. ↵
    1. Pisarevsky S. A.,
    2. Elming S.-Å.,
    3. Pesonen L. J.,
    4. Li Z.-X.
    , 2014a, Mesoproterozoic paleogeography: Supercontinent and beyond: Precambrian Research, v. 244, p. 207–225, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2013.05.014
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  175. ↵
    1. Pisarevsky S. A.,
    2. Wingate M. T. D.,
    3. Li Z.-X.,
    4. Wang X.-C.,
    5. Tohver E.,
    6. Kirkland C. L.
    , 2014b, Age and paleomagnetism of the 1210 Ma Gnowangerup–Fraser dyke swarm, Western Australia, and implications for late Mesoproterozoic paleogeography: Precambrian Research, v. 246, p. 1–15, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2014.02.011
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  176. ↵
    1. Powell C. McA.,
    2. Pisarevsky S. A.
    , 2002, Late Neoproterozoic assembly of East Gondwana: Geology, v. 30, n. 1, p. 3–6, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<0003:LNAOEG>2.0.CO;2
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  177. ↵
    1. Pradhan V. R.,
    2. Meert J. G.,
    3. Pandit M. K.,
    4. Kamenov G.,
    5. Gregory L. C.,
    6. Malone S. J.
    , 2010, India's changing place in global Proterozoic reconstructions: A review of geochronologic constraints and paleomagnetic poles from the Dharwar, Bundelkhand and Marwar cratons: Journal of Geodynamics, v. 50, n. 3–4, p. 224–242, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2009.11.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  178. ↵
    1. Pradhan V. R.,
    2. Meert J. G.,
    3. Pandit M. K.,
    4. Kamenov G.,
    5. Mondal M. E. A.
    , 2012, Paleomagnetic and geochronological studies of the mafic dyke swarms of Bundelkhand craton, central India: Implications for the tectonic evolution and paleogeographic reconstructions: Precambrian Research, v. 198–199, p. 51–76, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2011.11.011
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  179. ↵
    1. Pullen A.,
    2. Kapp P.,
    3. Gehrels G. E.,
    4. Vervoort J. D.,
    5. Ding L.
    , 2008, Triassic continental subduction in central Tibet and Mediterranean-style closure of the Paleo-Tethys Ocean: Geology, v. 36, n. 5, p. 351–354, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1130/G24435A.1
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  180. ↵
    1. Qi L.,
    2. Xu Y.,
    3. Cawood P. A.,
    4. Du Y.
    , 2018, Reconstructing Cryogenian to Ediacaran successions and paleogeography of the South China Block: Precambrian Research, v. 314, p. 452–467, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2018.07.003
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  181. ↵
    1. Quigley M. C.,
    2. Liangjun Y.,
    3. Gregory C.,
    4. Corvino A.,
    5. Sandiford M.,
    6. Wilson C. J. L.,
    7. Xiaohan L.
    , 2008, U–Pb SHRIMP zircon geochronology and T–t–d history of the Kampa Dome, southern Tibet: Tectonophysics, v. 446, n. 1–4, p. 97–113, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2007.11.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  182. ↵
    1. Raghav K.,
    2. De C.,
    3. Jain R.
    , 2005, The first record of Vendian Medusoids and trace fossil-bearing algal matgrounds from the basal part of the Marwar Supergroup of Rajasthan, India: Indian Minerals, v. 59, p. 23–30.
    OpenUrlGeoRef
  183. ↵
    1. Rajendra Prasad B.,
    2. Klemperer S. L.,
    3. Vijaya Rao V.,
    4. Tewari H. C.,
    5. Khare P.
    , 2011, Crustal structure beneath the Sub-Himalayan fold–thrust belt, Kangra recess, northwest India, from seismic reflection profiling: Implications for Late Paleoproterozoic orogenesis and modern earthquake hazard: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 308, n. 1–2, p. 218–228, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.05.052
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  184. ↵
    1. Ranjan S.,
    2. Upadhyay D.,
    3. Abhinay K.,
    4. Pruseth K. L.,
    5. Nanda J. K.
    , 2018, Zircon geochronology of deformed alkaline rocks along the Eastern Ghats Belt margin: India–Antarctica connection and the Enderbia continent: Precambrian Research, v. 310, p. 407–424, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2018.04.005
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  185. ↵
    1. Rao J. M.
    , 2004, The wide spread 2 Ga dyke activity in the Indian Shield -Evidences from Bundelkhand Mafic Dyke Swarm, Central India and their tectonic implications: Gondwana Research, v. 7, n. 4, p. 1219–1228, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1342-937X(05)71096-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  186. ↵
    1. Rathore S. S.,
    2. Venkatesan T. R.,
    3. Srivastava R. K.
    , 1999, Rb-Sr isotope dating of Neoproterozoic (Malani Group) magmatism from Southwest Rajasthan, India: Evidence of younger Pan-African thermal event by 40Ar-39Ar Studies: Gondwana Research, v. 2, n. 2, p. 271–281, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1342-937X(05)70151-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  187. ↵
    1. Raza M.,
    2. Khan M.,
    3. Azam M.
    , 2007, Plate-plume-accretion tectonics in Proterozoic terrain of northeastern Rajasthan, India: Evidence from mafic volcanic rocks of north Delhi fold belt: Island Arc, v. 16, n. 4, p. 536–552, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1738.2007.00581.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  188. ↵
    1. Richards A.,
    2. Argles T.,
    3. Harris N.,
    4. Parrish R.,
    5. Ahmad T.,
    6. Darbyshire F.,
    7. Draganits E.
    , 2005, Himalayan architecture constrained by isotopic tracers from clastic sediments: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 236, n. 3–4, p. 773–796, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2005.05.034
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  189. ↵
    1. Richards A.,
    2. Parrish R.,
    3. Harris N.,
    4. Argles T.,
    5. Zhang L.
    , 2006, Correlation of lithotectonic units across the eastern Himalaya, Bhutan: Geology, v. 34, n. 5, p. 341–344, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1130/G22169.1
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  190. ↵
    1. Rogers J. J. W.,
    2. Santosh M.
    , 2002, Configuration of Columbia, a Mesoproterozoic supercontinent: Gondwana Research, v. 5, n. 1, p. 5–22, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1342-937X(05)70883-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  191. ↵
    1. Roy A. B.
    , 2012, Indian shield: insight into the pristine size, shape and tectonic framework: Indian Journal of Geosciences, v. 66, p. 181–192.
    OpenUrl
  192. ↵
    1. Roy A.,
    2. Hanuma Prasad M. H.
    , 2003, Tectonothermal events in Central Indian Tectonic Zone (CITZ) and its implications in Rodinian crustal assembly: Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, v. 22, n. 2, p. 115–129, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1367-9120(02)00180-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  193. ↵
    1. Roy A. B.,
    2. Jakhar S. R.
    , 2002, Geology of Rajasthan: Precambrian to Recent: Jodhpur, India, Scientific Publishers, 421 p.
  194. ↵
    1. Roy A.,
    2. Kröner A.
    , 1996, Single zircon evaporation ages constraining the growth of the Archaean Aravalli craton, northwestern Indian shield: Geological Magazine, v. 133, n. 3, p. 333–342, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0016756800009067
    OpenUrlAbstract
  195. ↵
    1. Roy A. B.,
    2. Purohit R.
    , 2015, Lithostratigraphic, geochronological and depositional framework of the Precambrian basins of the Aravalli Mountains and adjoining areas, Rajasthan, India: Geological Society, London, Memoirs, v. 43, p. 55–65, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1144/M43.4
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  196. ↵
    1. Montenari M.
    1. Saha D.,
    2. Patranabis-Deb S.,
    3. Collins A. S.
    , 2016, Proterozoic stratigraphy of southern Indian cratons and global context, in Montenari M., editor, Stratigraphy & Timescales: The Netherlands, Elsevier, p. 1–59, doi:https://dx.doi.orghttps://doi.org/0.1016/bs.sats.2016.10.003
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  197. ↵
    1. Shu L.,
    2. Deng P.,
    3. Yu J.,
    4. Wang Y.,
    5. Jiang S.
    , 2008, The age and tectonic environment of the rhyolitic rocks on the western side of Wuyi Mountain, South China: Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, v. 51, p. 1053–1063, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11430-008-0078-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  198. ↵
    1. Singh S.,
    2. Barley M. E.,
    3. Brown S. J.,
    4. Jain A. K.,
    5. Manickavasagam R. M.
    , 2002, SHRIMP U-Pb in zircon geochronology of the Chor granitoid: Evidence for Neoproterozoic magmatism in the Lesser Himalayan granite belt of NW India: Precambrian Research, v. 118, n. 3–4, p. 285–292, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(02)00107-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  199. ↵
    1. Singh S.,
    2. Jain A. K.,
    3. Barley M. E.
    , 2009, SHRIMP U-Pb c. 1860 Ma anorogenic magmatic signatures from the NW Himalaya: Implications for Palaeoproterozoic assembly of the Columbia Supercontinent: Geological Society, London, Special Publications, v. 323, p. 283–300, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1144/SP323.14[Mismatch]
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  200. ↵
    1. Spencer C. J.,
    2. Harris R. A.,
    3. Dorais M. J.
    , 2012, Depositional provenance of the Himalayan metamorphic core of Garhwal region, India: Constrained by U–Pb and Hf isotopes in zircons: Gondwana Research, v. 22, n. 1, p. 26–35, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2011.10.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  201. ↵
    1. Squire R. J.,
    2. Campbell I. H.,
    3. Allen C. M.,
    4. Wilson C. J. L.
    , 2006, Did the Transgondwanan Supermountain trigger the explosive radiation of animals on Earth?: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 250, n. 1–2, p. 116–133, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2006.07.032
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  202. ↵
    1. Stein H. J.,
    2. Hannah J. L.,
    3. Zimmerman A.,
    4. Markey R. J.,
    5. Sarkar S. C.,
    6. Pal A. B.
    , 2004, A 2.5 Ga porphyry Cu–Mo–Au deposit at Malanjkhand, central India: Implications for Late Archean continental assembly: Precambrian Research, v. 134, n. 3–4, p. 189–226, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2004.05.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  203. ↵
    1. Sun M.,
    2. Chen N.,
    3. Zhao G.,
    4. Wilde S. A.,
    5. Ye K.,
    6. Guo J.,
    7. Chen Y.,
    8. Yuan C.
    , 2008, U-Pb zircon and Sm-Nd isotopic study of the Huangtuling granulite, Dabie-Sulu belt, China: Implication for the Paleoproterozoic tectonic history of the Yangtze Craton: American Journal of Science, v. 308, n. 4, p. 469–483, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.2475/04.2008.03
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  204. ↵
    1. Sun W. H.,
    2. Zhou M. F.,
    3. Gao J. F.,
    4. Yang Y. H.,
    5. Zhao X. F.,
    6. Zhao J. H.
    , 2009, Detrital zircon U-Pb geochronological and Lu-Hf isotopic constraints on the Precambrian magmatic and crustal evolution of the western Yangtze Block, SW China: Precambrian Research, v. 172, n. 1–2, p. 99–126, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2009.03.010
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  205. ↵
    1. Takamura Y.,
    2. Tsunogae T.,
    3. Santosh M.,
    4. Tsutsumi Y.
    , 2018, Detrital zircon geochronology of the Lützow-Holm Complex, East Antarctica: Implications for Antarctica–Sri Lanka correlation: Geoscience Frontiers, v. 9, n. 2, p. 355–375, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2017.08.006
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  206. ↵
    1. Torsvik T. H.,
    2. Ashwal L. D.,
    3. Tucker R. D.,
    4. Eide E. A.
    , 2001a, Neoproterozoic geochronology and palaeogeography of the Seychelles microcontinent: The India link: Precambrian Research, v. 110, n. 1–4, p. 47–59, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(01)00180-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  207. ↵
    1. Torsvik T. H.,
    2. Carter L. M.,
    3. Ashwal L. D.,
    4. Bhushan S. K.,
    5. Pandit M. K.,
    6. Jamtveit B.
    , 2001b, Rodinia refined or obscured: Palaeomagnetism of the Malani igneous suite (NW India): Precambrian Research, v. 108, n. 3–4, p. 319–333, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(01)00139-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  208. ↵
    1. Turner C. C.,
    2. Meert J. G.,
    3. Pandit M. K.,
    4. Kamenov G. D.
    , 2014, A detrital zircon U–Pb and Hf isotopic transect across the Son Valley sector of the Vindhyan basin, India: Implications for basin evolution and paleogeography: Gondwana Research, v. 26, n. 1, p. 348–364, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2013.07.009
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  209. ↵
    1. Upadhyay D.
    , 2008, Alkaline magmatism along the southeastern margin of the Indian shield: Implications for regional geodynamics and constraints on craton–Eastern Ghats Belt suturing: Precambrian Research, v. 162, n. 1–2, p. 59–69, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2007.07.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  210. ↵
    1. Vadlamani R.
    , 2019, Cambrian garnet Sm-Nd isotopic ages from the polydeformed Bolangir Anorthosite Complex, Eastern Ghats Belt, India: Implications for intraplate orogeny coeval with Kuunga Orogeny during Gondwana Assembly: The Journal of Geology, v. 127, n. 4, p. 437–456, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/703463
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  211. ↵
    1. Van Lente B.,
    2. Ashwal L. D.,
    3. Pandit M. K.,
    4. Bowring S. A.,
    5. Torsvik T. H.
    , 2009, Neoproterozoic hydrothermally altered basaltic rocks from Rajasthan, northwest India: Implications for late Precambrian tectonic evolution of the Aravalli Craton: Precambrian Research, v. 170, n. 3–4, p. 202–222, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2009.01.007
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  212. ↵
    1. Volpe A. M.,
    2. Douglas Macdougall J.
    , 1990, Geochemistry and isotopic characteristics of mafic (Phulad Ophiolite) and related rocks in the Delhi Supergroup, Rajasthan, India: Implications for rifting in the Proterozoic: Precambrian Research, v. 48, n. 1–2, p. 167–191, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-9268(90)90061-T
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  213. ↵
    1. Wang J.,
    2. Li Z. X.
    , 2003, History of Neoproterozoic rift basins in South China: Implications for Rodinia break-up: Precambrian Research, v. 122, n. 1–4, p. 141–158, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(02)00209-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  214. ↵
    1. Wang J. G.,
    2. Yu S. Q.,
    3. Zhao X. D.,
    4. Wu M.,
    5. Gu M. G.,
    6. Hu Y. H.
    , 2014a, The discovery of Paleoproterozoic mafic-ultramafic rocks in the Wuyishan Block: Description of profile and characteristics of petrology, petrography and isotope geochronology: Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, v. 33, p. 617–629, (in Chinese with English abstract).
    OpenUrl
  215. ↵
    1. Wang K.-X.,
    2. Li-Qiang S.,
    3. Tao S.,
    4. Hui H.,
    5. Qin L. S.
    , 2018a, Provenance, weathering conditions, and tectonic evolution history of the Cambrian meta-sediments in the Zhuguangshan area, Cathaysia Block: Precambrian Research, v. 311, p. 195–210, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2018.04.011
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  216. ↵
    1. Wang L. J.,
    2. Yu J. H.,
    3. Griffin W. L.,
    4. O'Reilly S. Y.
    , 2012a, Early crustal evolution in the western Yangtze Block: Evidence from U–Pb and Lu–Hf isotopes on detrital zircons from sedimentary rocks: Precambrian Research., v. 222–223, p. 368–385, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2011.08.001
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  217. ↵
    1. Wang W.,
    2. Zhou M.-F.
    , 2012, Sedimentary records of the Yangtze Block (South China) and their correlation with equivalent Neoproterozoic sequences on adjacent continents: Sedimentary Geology, v. 265–266, p. 126–142, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2012.04.003
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  218. ↵
    1. Wang W.,
    2. Zhou M.-F.
    2014, Provenance and tectonic setting of the Paleo- to Mesoproterozoic Dongchuan Group in the southwestern Yangtze Block, South China: Implication for the breakup of the supercontinent Columbia: Tectonophysics, v. 610, p. 110–127, doi:https://dx.doi.orghttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2013.11.009
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  219. ↵
    1. Wang W.,
    2. Cawood P. A.,
    3. Zhou M.-F.,
    4. Zhao J.-H.
    , 2016a, Paleoproterozoic magmatic and metamorphic events link Yangtze to northwest Laurentia in the Nuna supercontinent: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 433, p. 269–279, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2015.11.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  220. ↵
    1. Wang W.,
    2. Zhou M.-F.,
    3. Zhao J.-H.,
    4. Pandit M.,
    5. Zheng J.-P.,
    6. Liu Z.-R.
    , 2016b, Neoproterozoic active continental margin in the southeastern Yangtze Block of South China: Evidence from the ca. 830–810 Ma sedimentary strata: Sedimentary Geology, v. 342, p. 254–267, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2016.07.006
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  221. ↵
    1. Wang W.,
    2. Cawood P. A.,
    3. Zhou M. F.,
    4. Pandit M. K.,
    5. Chen W. T.
    , 2017a, Zircon U-Pb age and Hf isotope evidence for Eoarchean crustal remnant and episodic crustal reworking in response to supercontinent cycles in NW India: Journal of Geological Society, v. 174, n. 4, p. 759–772, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1144/jgs2016-080
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  222. ↵
    1. Wang W.,
    2. Cawood P. A.,
    3. Zhou M. F.,
    4. Pandit M. K.,
    5. Xia X. P.,
    6. Zhao J. H.
    , 2017b, Low-δ18O rhyolites from the Malani Igneous Suite: A positive test for South China and NW India linkage in Rodinia: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 44, n. 20, p. 10298–10305, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074717
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  223. ↵
    1. Wang W.,
    2. Cawood P. A.,
    3. Pandit M. K.,
    4. Xia X.-P.,
    5. Zhao J.-H.
    , 2018b, Coupled Precambrian crustal evolution and supercontinent cycles: Insights from in-situ U-Pb, O- and Hf-isotopes in detrital zircon, NW india: American Journal of Science, v. 318, n. 10, p. 989–1017, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.2475/10.2018.01
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  224. ↵
    1. Wang W.,
    2. Pandit M. K.,
    3. Zhao J.-H.,
    4. Chen W.-T.,
    5. Zheng J.-P.
    , 2018c, Slab break-off triggered lithosphere – asthenosphere interaction at a convergent margin: The Neoproterozoic bimodal magmatism in NW India: Lithos, v. 296–299, p. 281–296, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2017.11.010
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  225. ↵
    1. Wang W.,
    2. Zeng M.-F.,
    3. Zhou M.-F.,
    4. Zhao J.-H.,
    5. Zheng J.-P.,
    6. Lan Z.-F.
    , 2018d, Age, provenance and tectonic setting of Neoproterozoic to early Paleozoic sequences in southeastern South China Block: Constraints on its linkage to western Australia-East Antarctica: Precambrian Research, v. 309, p. 290–308, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2017.03.002
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  226. ↵
    1. Wang W.,
    2. Cawood P. A.,
    3. Pandit M. K.,
    4. Zhao J. H.,
    5. Zheng J. P.
    , 2019a, No collision between Eastern and Western Gondwana at their northern extent: Geology, v. 47, n. 4, p. 308–312, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1130/G45745.1
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  227. ↵
    1. Wang W.,
    2. Cawood P. A.,
    3. Pandit M. K.,
    4. Zhou M. F.,
    5. Zhao J. H.
    , 2019b, Evolving passive- and active- margin tectonics of Paleoproterozoic Aravalli Basin, NW India: GSA Bulletin, v. 131, n. 3–4, p. 426–443, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1130/B35027.1
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  228. ↵
    1. Wang W.,
    2. Cawood P. A.,
    3. Manoj P. K.,
    4. Xia X. P.,
    5. Raveggi M.,
    6. Zhao J. H.,
    7. Zheng J. P.,
    8. Qi L.
    , 2021, Fragmentation of South China from greater India during the Rodinia-Gondwana transition: Geology, v. 49, p. 228–232 doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1130/G48308.1
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  229. ↵
    1. Wang X. L.,
    2. Zhou J. C.,
    3. Wan Y. S.,
    4. Kitajima K.,
    5. Wang D.,
    6. Bonamici C.,
    7. Qiu J. S.,
    8. Sun T.
    , 2013a, Magmatic evolution and crustal recycling for Neoproterozoic strongly peraluminous granitoids from southern China: Hf and O isotopes in zircon: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 366, p. 71–82, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.02.011
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  230. ↵
    1. Wang X. L.,
    2. Zhou J. C.,
    3. Griffin W. L.,
    4. Zhao G. C.,
    5. Yu J. H.,
    6. Qiu J. S.,
    7. Zhang Y. J.,
    8. Xing G. F.
    , 2014b, Geochemical zonation across a Neoproterozoic orogenic belt: Isotopic evidence from granitoids and metasedimentary rocks of the Jiangnan orogen, China: Precambrian Research, v. 242, p. 154–171, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2013.12.023
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  231. ↵
    1. Wang X. X.,
    2. Zhang J. J.,
    3. Santosh M.,
    4. Liu J.,
    5. Yan S. Y.,
    6. Guo L.
    , 2012b, Andean-type orogeny in the Himalayas of south Tibet: Implications for early Paleozoic tectonics along the Indian margin of Gondwana: Lithos, v. 154, p. 248–262, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2012.07.011
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  232. ↵
    1. Wang Y.,
    2. Zhang A.,
    3. Cawood P. A.,
    4. Fan W.,
    5. Xu J.,
    6. Zhang G.,
    7. Zhang Y.
    , 2013b, Geochronological, geochemical and Nd-Hf-Os isotopic fingerprinting of an early Neoproterozoic arc-back-arc system in South China and its accretionary assembly along the margin of Rodinia: Precambrian Research, v. 231, p. 343–371, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2013.03.020
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  233. ↵
    1. Wang Y.,
    2. Zeng L.,
    3. Gao L.-E.,
    4. Guo C.,
    5. Hou K.,
    6. Zhang L.,
    7. Wang W.,
    8. Sun H.
    , 2017c, Neoproterozoic magmatism in eastern Himalayan terrane: Science Bulletin, v. 62, n. 6, p. 415–424, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2017.02.003
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  234. ↵
    1. Wang Y. J.,
    2. Zhang F. F.,
    3. Fan W. M.,
    4. Zhang G. W.,
    5. Chen S. Y.,
    6. Cawood P. A.,
    7. Zhang A. M.
    , 2010, Tectonic setting of the South China Block in the early Paleozoic: Resolving intracontinental and ocean closure models from detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology: Tectonics, v. 29, n. 6, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010TC002750
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  235. ↵
    1. Wang Z.,
    2. Xu D.,
    3. Hu G.,
    4. Yu L.,
    5. Wu C.,
    6. Zhang Z.,
    7. Cai J.,
    8. Shan Q.,
    9. Hou M.,
    10. Chen H.
    , 2015, Detrital zircon U–Pb ages of the Proterozoic metaclastic-sedimentary rocks in Hainan Province of South China: New constraints on the depositional time, source area, and tectonic setting of the Shilu Fe–Co–Cu ore district: Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, v. 113, Part 3, p. 1143–1161, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.04.014
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  236. ↵
    1. Wen B.,
    2. Evans D. A. D.,
    3. Li Y.-X.
    , 2017, Neoproterozoic paleogeography of the Tarim Block: An extended or alternative “missing-link” model for Rodinia?: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 458, p. 92–106, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.10.030
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  237. ↵
    1. Wiedenbeck M.,
    2. Goswami J. N.,
    3. Roy A. B.
    , 1996, Stabilization of the Aravalli Craton of northwestern India at 2.5 Ga: An ion microprobe zircon study: Chemical Geology, v. 129, n. 3–4, p. 325–340, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(95)00182-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  238. ↵
    1. Williams H.,
    2. Hoffman P. F.,
    3. Lewry J. F.,
    4. Monger J. W. H.,
    5. Rivers T.
    , 1991, Anatomy of North America: Thematic geologic portrayals of the continent: Tectonophysics, v. 187, n. 1–3, p. 117–134, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(91)90416-P
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  239. ↵
    1. Wu G.,
    2. Xiao Y.,
    3. Bonin B.,
    4. Ma D.,
    5. Li X.,
    6. Zhu G.
    , 2018, Ca. 850 Ma magmatic events in the Tarim Craton: Age, geochemistry and implications for assembly of Rodinia supercontinent: Precambrian Research, v. 305, p. 489–503, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2017.10.020
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  240. ↵
    1. Wu L.,
    2. Jia D.,
    3. Li H.,
    4. Deng F.,
    5. Li Y.-Q.
    , 2010, Provenance of detrital zircons from the late Neoproterozoic to Ordovician sandstones of South China: Implications for its continental affinity: Geological Magazine, v. 147, n. 6, p. 974–980, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0016756810000725
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  241. ↵
    1. Wu Y. B.,
    2. Zheng Y. F.,
    3. Gao S.,
    4. Jiao W. F.,
    5. Liu Y. S.
    , 2008, Zircon U-Pb age and trace element evidence for Paleoproterozoic granulite-facies metamorphism and Archean crustal rocks in the Dabie Orogen: Lithos, v. 101, n. 3–4, p. 308–322, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2007.07.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  242. ↵
    1. Xiong C.,
    2. Chen H.,
    3. Niu Y.,
    4. Chen A.,
    5. Zhang C.,
    6. Li F.,
    7. Xu S.,
    8. Yang S.
    , 2019, Provenance, depositional setting, and crustal evolution of the Cathaysia Block, South China: Insights from detrital zircon U–Pb geochronology and geochemistry of clastic rocks: Geological Journal, v. 54, n. 2, p. 897–912, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gj.3253
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  243. ↵
    1. Xu Y. J.,
    2. Cawood P. A.,
    3. Du Y. S.,
    4. Hu L. S.,
    5. Yu W. C.,
    6. Zhu Y. H.,
    7. Li W. C.
    , 2013, Linking south China to northern Australia and India on the margin of Gondwana: Constraints from detrital zircon U-Pb and Hf isotopes in Cambrian strata: Tectonics, v. 32, n. 6, p. 2012TC003283, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tect.20099
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  244. ↵
    1. Xu Y.,
    2. Cawood P. A.,
    3. Du Y.,
    4. Huang H.,
    5. Wang X.
    , 2014, Early Paleozoic orogenesis along Gondwana's northern margin constrained by provenance data from South China: Tectonophysics, v. 636, p. 40–51, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2014.08.022
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  245. ↵
    1. Xu Y.-J.,
    2. Cawood P. A.,
    3. Du Y.-S.
    , 2016, Intraplate orogenesis in response to Gondwana assembly: Kwangsian Orogeny, South China: American Journal of Science, v. 316, n. 4, p. 329–362, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.2475/04.2016.02
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  246. ↵
    1. Xu Y.-J.,
    2. Cawood P. A.,
    3. Zhang H.-C.,
    4. Zi J.-W.,
    5. Zhou J.-B.,
    6. Li L.-X.,
    7. Du Y.-S.
    , 2019, The Mesoproterozoic Baoban Complex, South China: A missing fragment of western Laurentian lithosphere: GSA Bulletin, v. 132, n. 7–8, p. 1404–1418, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1130/B35380.1
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  247. ↵
    1. Xue E.-K.,
    2. Wang W.,
    3. Huang S.-F.,
    4. Lu G.-M.
    , 2019, Detrital zircon U-Pb-Hf isotopes and whole-rock geochemistry of Neoproterozoic-Cambrian successions in the Cathaysia Block of South China: Implications on paleogeographic reconstruction in supercontinent: Precambrian Research, v. 331, p. 105348, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2019.105348
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  248. ↵
    1. Xue E. K.,
    2. Wang W.,
    3. Zhou M. F.,
    4. Pandit M. K.,
    5. Huang S. F.,
    6. Lu G. M.
    , 2020, Late Neoproterozoic-early Paleozoic basin evolution in the Cathaysia Block, South China: Implications of spatio-temporal provenance changes on the paleogeographic reconstructionsin supercontinent cycles: GSA Bulletin, v. 133, n. 3–4, p. 717–739, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1130/B35588.1
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  249. ↵
    1. Yan D. -P.,
    2. Qiu L.
    , 2020, Geology of China and adjacent regions: An introduction: Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, v. 203, p. 104533, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2020.104533
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  250. ↵
    1. Yao J. L.,
    2. Shu L. S.,
    3. Santosh M.
    , 2011, Detrital zircon U–Pb geochronology, Hf-isotopes and geochemistry—New clues for the Precambrian crustal evolution of Cathaysia Block, South China: Gondwana Research, v. 20, n. 2–3, p. 553–567, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2011.01.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  251. ↵
    1. Yao J. L.,
    2. Cawood P. A.,
    3. Shu L.,
    4. Zhao G.
    , 2019, Jiangnan Orogen, South China: A ∼970–820 Ma Rodinia margin accretionary belt: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 196, p. 102872, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.05.016
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  252. ↵
    1. Yao W.-H.,
    2. Li Z.-X.,
    3. Li W.-X.,
    4. Li X.-H.,
    5. Yang J.-H.
    , 2014, From Rodinia to Gondwanaland: A tale of detrital zircon provenance analyses from the southern Nanhua Basin, South China: American Journal of Science, v. 314, n. 1, p. 278–313, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.2475/01.2014.08
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  253. ↵
    1. Yao W.-H.,
    2. Li Z.-X.,
    3. Li W.-X.,
    4. Su L.,
    5. Yang J.-H.
    , 2015, Detrital provenance evolution of the Ediacaran–Silurian Nanhua foreland basin, South China: Gondwana Research, v. 28, n. 4, p. 1449–1465, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2014.10.018
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  254. ↵
    1. Yao W.,
    2. Li Z.-X.,
    3. Li W.-X.,
    4. Li X.-H.
    , 2017, Proterozoic tectonics of Hainan Island in supercontinent cycles: New insights from geochronological and isotopic results: Precambrian Research, v. 290, p. 86–100, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2017.01.001
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  255. ↵
    1. Yedekar D. B.,
    2. Jain S. C.,
    3. Nair K. K. K.,
    4. Dutta K. K.
    , 1990, The central Indian collision suture, Precambrian of central India: Geological Soceity of India, Special Publication, v. 28, p. 1–37.
    OpenUrl
  256. ↵
    1. Yin A.,
    2. Harrison T. M.
    , 2000, Geologic evolution of the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen: Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, v. 28, p. 211–280, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.28.1.211
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  257. ↵
    1. Yin A.,
    2. Dubey C. S.,
    3. Webb A. A. G.,
    4. Kelty T. K.,
    5. Grove M.,
    6. Gehrels G. E.,
    7. Burgess W. P.
    , 2010, Geologic correlation of the Himalayan orogen and Indian craton: Part 1. Structural geology, U-Pb zircon geochronology, and tectonic evolution of the Shillong Plateau and its neighboring regions in NE India: GSA Bulletin, v. 122, n. 3–4, p. 336–359, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1130/B26460.1
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  258. ↵
    1. Yin C.,
    2. Lin S.,
    3. Davis D. W.,
    4. Zhao G.,
    5. Xiao W.,
    6. Li L.,
    7. He Y.
    , 2013, 2.1–1.85 Ga tectonic events in the Yangtze Block, South China: Petrological and geochronological evidence from the Kongling Complex and implications for the reconstruction of supercontinent Columbia: Lithos, v. 182–183, p. 200–210, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2013.10.012
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  259. ↵
    1. Yoshida M.,
    2. Bindu R. S.,
    3. Kagami H.,
    4. Rajesham T.,
    5. Santosh M.,
    6. Shirahata H.
    , 1996, Geochronologic constraints of granulite terranes of South India and their implications for the Precambrian assembly of Gondwana: Journal of Southeast Asian Earth Sciences, v. 14, n. 3–4, p. 137–147, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0743-9547(96)00053-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  260. ↵
    1. Yu J. H.,
    2. O'Reilly S. Y.,
    3. Zhou M. F.,
    4. Griffin W. L.,
    5. Wang L. J.
    , 2012, U–Pb geochronology and Hf–Nd isotopic geochemistry of the Badu Complex, Southeastern China: Implications for the Precambrian crustal evolution and paleogeography of the Cathaysia Block: Precambrian Research, v. 222–223, p. 424–449, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2011.07.014
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  261. ↵
    1. Zhang S.,
    2. Li Z.-X.,
    3. Evans D. A. D.,
    4. Wu H.,
    5. Li H.,
    6. Dong J.
    , 2012, Pre-Rodinia supercontinent Nuna shaping up: A global synthesis with new paleomagnetic results from North China: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 353–354, p. 145–155, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2012.07.034
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  262. ↵
    1. Zhang S. B.,
    2. Zheng Y. F.
    , 2013, Formation and evolution of Precambrian continental lithosphere in South China: Gondwana Research, v. 23, n. 4, p. 1241–1260, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2012.09.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  263. ↵
    1. Zhang X. Z.,
    2. Dong Y. S.,
    3. Li C.,
    4. Xie C. M.,
    5. Yang H. T.,
    6. Wang M.
    , 2013, Delineation of Middle Neoproterozoic ophiolite mélange in the northern Lhasa terrane, South Tibet and its significance: Acta Petrologica Sinica, v. 29, p. 698–722 (in Chinese with English Abstract).
    OpenUrlGeoRef
  264. ↵
    1. Zhao G. C.,
    2. Cawood P. A.,
    3. Wilde S. A.,
    4. Sun M.
    , 2002, Review of global 2.1–1.8 Ga orogens: Implications for a pre-Rodinia supercontinent: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 59, n. 1–4, p. 125–162, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0012-8252(02)00073-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  265. ↵
    1. Zhao G. C.,
    2. Li S. Z.,
    3. Sun M.,
    4. Wilde S. A.
    , 2011, Assembly, accretion, and break-up of the Palaeo-Mesoproterozoic Columbia supercontinent: Record in the North China Craton revisited: International Geology Review, v. 53, n. 11–12, p. 1331–1356, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2010.527631
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  266. ↵
    1. Zhao J. H.,
    2. Zhou M. F.,
    3. Zheng J. P.
    , 2013a, Constraints from zircon U–Pb ages, O and Hf isotopic compositions on the origin of Neoproterozoic peraluminous granitoids from the Jiangnan Fold Belt, South China: Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, v. 166, p. 1505–1519, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00410-013-0940-z
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  267. ↵
    1. Zhao J.-H.,
    2. Li Q.-W.,
    3. Liu H.,
    4. Wang W.
    , 2018a, Neoproterozoic magmatism in the western and northern margins of the Yangtze Block (South China) controlled by slab subduction and subduction-transform-edge-propagator: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 187, p. 1–18, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.10.004
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  268. ↵
    1. Zhao J.-H.,
    2. Pandit M. K.,
    3. Wang W.,
    4. Xia X.-P.
    , 2018b, Neoproterozoic tectonothermal evolution of NW India: Evidence from geochemistry and geochronology of granitoids: Lithos, v. 316–317, p. 330–346, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2018.07.020
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  269. ↵
    1. Zhao L.,
    2. Zhou X.,
    3. Zhai M.,
    4. Santosh M.,
    5. Ma X.,
    6. Shan H.,
    7. Cui X.
    , 2014, Paleoproterozoic tectonic transition from collision to extension in the eastern Cathaysia Block, South China: Evidence from geochemistry, zircon U–Pb geochronology and Nd–Hf isotopes of a granite–charnockite suite in southwestern Zhejiang: Lithos, v. 184–187, p. 259–280, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2013.11.005
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  270. ↵
    1. Zhao X.-F.,
    2. Zhou M.-F.,
    3. Li J.-W.,
    4. Selby D.,
    5. Li X.-H.,
    6. Qi L.
    , 2013b, Sulfide Re-Os and Rb-Sr isotope dating of the Canadian IOCG Metallogenic Province, Southwest China: Implications for regional metallogenesis: Economic Geology, v. 108, n. 6, p. 1489–1498, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.2113/econgeo.108.6.1489
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  271. ↵
    1. Zhao X.-F.,
    2. Zhou M.-F.,
    3. Su Z.-K.,
    4. Li X.-C.,
    5. Chen W.-T.,
    6. Li J.-W.
    , 2017, Geology, geochronology, and geochemistry of the Dahongshan Fe-Cu-(Au-Ag) deposit, Southwest China: Implications for the formation of iron oxide copper-gold deposits in intracratonic rift settings: Economic Geology, v. 112, n. 3, p. 603–628, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.2113/econgeo.112.3.603
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  272. ↵
    1. Zhao X. F.,
    2. Zhou M. F.,
    3. Li J. W.,
    4. Sun M.,
    5. Gao J. F.,
    6. Sun W. H.,
    7. Yang J. H.
    , 2010, Late Paleoproterozoic to early Mesoproterozoic Dongchuan Group in Yunnan, SW China: Implications for tectonic evolution of the Yangtze Block: Precambrian Research, v. 182, n. 1–2, p. 57–69, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2010.06.021
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  273. ↵
    1. Zheng Y.-F.,
    2. Zhao Z.-F.,
    3. Wu Y.-B.,
    4. Zhang S.-B.,
    5. Liu X.,
    6. Wu F.-Y.
    , 2006, Zircon U-Pb age, Hf and O isotope constraints on protolith origin of ultrahigh-pressure eclogite and gneiss in the Dabie orogen: Chemical Geology, v. 231, n. 1–2, p. 135–158, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2006.01.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  274. ↵
    1. Zheng Y. F.,
    2. Gong B.,
    3. Zhao Z. F.,
    4. Wu Y. B.,
    5. Chen F. K.
    , 2008, Zircon U-Pb age and O isotope evidence for Neoproterozoic low-18O magmatism during supercontinental rifting in South China: Implications for the Snowball Earth Event: American Journal of Science, v. 308, n. 4, p. 484–516, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.2475/04.2008.04
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  275. ↵
    1. Zheng Y. F.,
    2. Zhang S. B.,
    3. Zhao Z. F.,
    4. Wu Y. B.,
    5. Li X. H.,
    6. Li Z. X.,
    7. Wu F. Y.
    , 2007, Contrasting zircon Hf and O isotopes in the two episodes of Neoproterozoic granitoids in South China: Implications for growth and reworking of continental crust: Lithos, v. 96, n. 1–2, p. 127–150, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2006.10.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  276. ↵
    1. Zhong Y.,
    2. Zhai M.,
    3. Peng P.,
    4. Santosh M.,
    5. Ma X.
    , 2015, Detrital zircon U–Pb dating and whole-rock geochemistry from the clastic rocks in the northern marginal basin of the North China Craton: Constraints on depositional age and provenance of the Bayan Obo Group: Precambrian Research, v. 258, p. 133–145, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2014.12.010
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  277. ↵
    1. Zhou M. F.,
    2. Yan D. P.,
    3. Kennedy A. K.,
    4. Li Y. Q.,
    5. Ding J.
    , 2002, SHRIMP U-Pb zircon geochronological and geochemical evidence for Neoproterozoic arc-related magmatism along the western margin of the Yangtze Block, South China: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 196, n. 1–2, p. 51–67, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00595-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  278. ↵
    1. Zhou M. F.,
    2. Ma Y. X.,
    3. Yan D. P.,
    4. Xia X. P.,
    5. Zhao J. H.,
    6. Sun M.
    , 2006, The Yanbian Terrane (Southern Sichuan Province, SW China): A Neoproterozoic arc assemblage in the western margin of the Yangtze Block: Precambrian Research, v. 144, n. 1–2, p. 19–38, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2005.11.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
  279. ↵
    1. Zhou M. F.,
    2. Zhao X. F.,
    3. Chen W. T.,
    4. Li X. C.,
    5. Wang W.,
    6. Yan D. P.,
    7. Qiu H. N.
    , 2014, Proterozoic Fe-Cu metallogeny and supercontinental cycles of the southwestern Yangtze Block, southern China and northern Vietnam: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 139, p. 59–82, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.08.013
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  280. ↵
    1. Zhou X.,
    2. Zheng J.,
    3. Li Y.,
    4. Griffin W. L.,
    5. Xiong Q.,
    6. Moghadam H. S.,
    7. O'Reilly S. Y.
    , 2019, Neoproterozoic sedimentary rocks track the location of the Lhasa Block during the Rodinia breakup: Precambrian Research, v. 320, p. 63–77, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2018.10.005
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  281. ↵
    1. Zhu D. C.,
    2. Zhao Z. D.,
    3. Niu Y.,
    4. Dilek Y.,
    5. Mo X. X.
    , 2011, Lhasa terrane in southern Tibet came from Australia: Geology, v. 39, n. 8, p. 727–730, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1130/G31895.1
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
India in the Nuna to Gondwana supercontinent cycles: Clues from the north Indian and Marwar Blocks
Wei Wang, Peter A. Cawood, Manoj K. Pandit
American Journal of Science Jan 2021, 321 (1-2) 83-117; DOI: 10.2475/01.2021.02
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Keywords