Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Special Volumes and Special Issue
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • FAQ
    • Terms & Conditions for use of AJS Online
  • Instructions to Authors
    • Focus and paper options
    • Submit your manuscript
  • Site Features
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Usage Statistics
    • RSS
  • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Science
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
American Journal of Science

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Special Volumes and Special Issue
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • FAQ
    • Terms & Conditions for use of AJS Online
  • Instructions to Authors
    • Focus and paper options
    • Submit your manuscript
  • Site Features
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Usage Statistics
    • RSS
  • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • The Journal
  • Follow ajs on Twitter
  • Visit ajs on Facebook
  • Follow ajs on Instagram
Research ArticleArticles

Late Neoarchean magmatic – metamorphic event and crustal stabilization in the North China Craton

Mingguo Zhai, Lei Zhao, Xiyan Zhu, Yanyan Zhou, Peng Peng, Jinghui Guo, Qiuli Li, Taiping Zhao, Junsheng Lu and Xianhua Li
American Journal of Science January 2021, 321 (1-2) 206-234; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2475/01.2021.06
Mingguo Zhai
* Key Laboratory of Computational Earth Dynamics, College of Earth Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
** State Key Laboratory of Lithosphere Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
*** State Key Laboratory of Continental Geodynamics, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, China
§ Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mgzhai@mail.iggcas.ac.cn
Lei Zhao
** State Key Laboratory of Lithosphere Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiyan Zhu
§ Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yanyan Zhou
** State Key Laboratory of Lithosphere Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peng Peng
* Key Laboratory of Computational Earth Dynamics, College of Earth Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
** State Key Laboratory of Lithosphere Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jinghui Guo
* Key Laboratory of Computational Earth Dynamics, College of Earth Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
** State Key Laboratory of Lithosphere Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qiuli Li
* Key Laboratory of Computational Earth Dynamics, College of Earth Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
** State Key Laboratory of Lithosphere Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Taiping Zhao
§§ Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 510640, Guangzhou, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Junsheng Lu
*** State Key Laboratory of Continental Geodynamics, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xianhua Li
* Key Laboratory of Computational Earth Dynamics, College of Earth Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
** State Key Laboratory of Lithosphere Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The ca. 2.5 Ga as the time boundary between the Archean and the Proterozoic eons is a landmark, indicating the most important continental crust evolving stage of the Earth, that is, the global cratonization or the formation of supercraton(s) that was unseen before and is unrepeated in the following history of the Earth's formation and evolution. The North China Craton (NCC) is one of the best recorders of the ca. 2.5 Ga event, and therefore studies in the thorough understanding of early Precambrian continental evolution are continuous.

The period from 2.8 to 2.6 Ga is the major crustal growth period of the NCC and formed seven micro-blocks. All the micro-blocks in the NCC were surrounded by 2.6 to 2.54 Ga greenstone belts. The clear geological presentations are as follows: (1) Archaic basement rocks in North China (various micro-blocks) experienced strong partial melting and migmatization. The granitoid rocks derived from crustal partial melting include potassium, TTG and monzonitic granitoids, which come, respectively, from continental crust (sedimentary rocks with TTG gneisses), juvenile crust (mafic rocks with TTG gneisses) or mixed crust; (2) the BIF-bearing supracrustal rocks are mainly distribute in greenstone belts. The lithologic associations in the greenstone belts within the NCC are broadly similar, belonging to volcano-sedimentary sequences, with common bimodal volcanic rocks (basalt and dacite) interlayered with minor amounts of komatiites in the lower part, and calc-alkalic volcanic rocks (basalt, andesite and felsic rocks) in the upper part; (3) nearly all old rocks of >2.5 Ga underwent ∼2.52 to 2.5 Ga metamorphism of amphibolite–granulite facies. Most metamorphosed rocks show high-temperature-ultra-high-temperature (HT–UHT) characteristics and record anticlockwise P–T paths, albeit a small number of granulites seemingly underwent high-pressure granulite facies metamorphism and record clockwise P–T paths; (4) ∼2.5 Ga mafic dikes (amphibolites), granitic dikes (veins) and syenitic–ultramafic dikes developed across these archaic basements and were strongly deformed or un-deformed; (5) the extensive 2.52 to 2.48 Ga low-grade metamorphic supracrustal covers has been recognized in eastern, northern and central parts of the NCC, which are commonly composed of bi-modal volcanic rocks and sedimentary rocks.

The above mentioned ∼2.5 Ga geological rocks and their characters imply that the seven micro-blocks have been united through amalgamation to form the NCC. The metamorphosed late Neoarchean greenstone belts, as syn-formed mobile belts, welded the micro-blocks at the end of the Neoarchean. However, the metamorphic thermal grades of the greenstone belts are lower than those of the high-grade terranes within the micro-blocks, suggesting that the latter might have developed under a higher geothermal gradient than the former. Besides, the greenstone belts surround the various micro-blocks in the late Neoarchean when both the old continental crust and the oceanic crust were hotter. The subduction during the amalgamation, if it happened, must have been much smaller in scale as compared to those in the Phanerozoic plate tectonic regime, and all stages occurred at crust-scale instead of lithosphere-scale or mantle-scale. This is why most rocks record HT-UHT and anti-clockwise metamorphism, while only a few samples record high-pressure granulite facies metamorphism with clockwise P–T paths.

The micro-block amalgamation was accompanied by extensive crust partial melting and granitization, which finally gave rise to the stabilization of the NCC. Except for the vast granitoid intrusions, mafic-syenitic dike swarms and sedimentary covers are also landmarks of cratonization. The ca. 2.5 Ga cratonization is a global epoch-making geological event, although the accomplishment of cratonization in various cratons is somewhat different in time. Cratonization declared the formation and stabilization of global-scale supercratons or cratonic groups coupling with lithosphere, which was followed by a “silent period” with rare tectonic-thermal action lasting 150 to 200 Ma (from 2.5 Ga – 2.3 or 2.35 Ga), and then followed by the Great Oxidation Event (GOE).

  • Late Neoarchean
  • North China Craton (NCC)
  • magmatic-metamorphic event
  • cratonization
View Full Text

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Science: 321 (1-2)
American Journal of Science
Vol. 321, Issue 1-2
1 Jan 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Late Neoarchean magmatic – metamorphic event and crustal stabilization in the North China Craton
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 11 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Late Neoarchean magmatic – metamorphic event and crustal stabilization in the North China Craton
Mingguo Zhai, Lei Zhao, Xiyan Zhu, Yanyan Zhou, Peng Peng, Jinghui Guo, Qiuli Li, Taiping Zhao, Junsheng Lu, Xianhua Li
American Journal of Science Jan 2021, 321 (1-2) 206-234; DOI: 10.2475/01.2021.06

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Late Neoarchean magmatic – metamorphic event and crustal stabilization in the North China Craton
Mingguo Zhai, Lei Zhao, Xiyan Zhu, Yanyan Zhou, Peng Peng, Jinghui Guo, Qiuli Li, Taiping Zhao, Junsheng Lu, Xianhua Li
American Journal of Science Jan 2021, 321 (1-2) 206-234; DOI: 10.2475/01.2021.06
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • NEOARCHEAN MICRO-BLOCKS AND ROCK UNITS
    • ∼2.5 GRANITES AND METAMORPHISM
    • MICRO-BLOCK AMALGAMATION AND CRATONIZATION
    • CRITERION OF CRATONIZATION
    • SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Timing and Nd-Hf isotopic mapping of early Mesozoic granitoids in the Qinling Orogen, central China: Implication for architecture, nature and processes of the orogen
  • India in the Nuna to Gondwana supercontinent cycles: Clues from the north Indian and Marwar Blocks
  • Unravelling the P-T-t history of three high-grade metamorphic events in the Epupa Complex, NW Namibia: Implications for the Paleoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic evolution of the Congo Craton
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Late Neoarchean
  • North China Craton (NCC)
  • magmatic-metamorphic event
  • cratonization

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Archive

More Information

  • RSS

Other Services

  • About Us

© 2023 American Journal of Science

Powered by HighWire