Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Special Volumes and Special Issue
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • FAQ
    • Terms & Conditions for use of AJS Online
  • Instructions to Authors
    • Focus and paper options
    • Submit your manuscript
  • Site Features
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Usage Statistics
    • RSS
  • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Science
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
American Journal of Science

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Special Volumes and Special Issue
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • FAQ
    • Terms & Conditions for use of AJS Online
  • Instructions to Authors
    • Focus and paper options
    • Submit your manuscript
  • Site Features
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Usage Statistics
    • RSS
  • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • The Journal
  • Follow ajs on Twitter
  • Visit ajs on Facebook
  • Follow ajs on Instagram
Research ArticleArticles

Recursive partitioning improves paleosol proxies for rainfall

William E. Lukens, Gary E. Stinchcomb, Lee C. Nordt, David J. Kahle, Steven G. Driese and Jack D. Tubbs
American Journal of Science December 2019, 319 (10) 819-845; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2475/10.2019.01
William E. Lukens
* Department of Geology and Environmental Science, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia 22807
** School of Geosciences, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, Louisiana 70504
*** Terrestrial Paleoclimatology Research Group, Department of Geosciences, Baylor University, Waco, Texas 76798
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lukenswe@jmu.edu
Gary E. Stinchcomb
§ Watershed Studies Institute & Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Murray State University, Murray, Kentucky 42071
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lee C. Nordt
*** Terrestrial Paleoclimatology Research Group, Department of Geosciences, Baylor University, Waco, Texas 76798
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David J. Kahle
§§ Department of Statistical Science, Baylor University, Waco, Texas 76798
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven G. Driese
*** Terrestrial Paleoclimatology Research Group, Department of Geosciences, Baylor University, Waco, Texas 76798
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jack D. Tubbs
§§ Department of Statistical Science, Baylor University, Waco, Texas 76798
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The bulk elemental composition of soil subsurface (B) horizons is influenced by environmental, biological, geological, and climatic factors. Because fossil soils (paleosols) are common in the geologic record, quantitative models that link climate to paleosol geochemistry are highly desirable in the paleoclimate community. Error associated with these models is typically reported as the root mean square error (RMSE) of a regression analysis and reflects the variability imparted by non-climatic influences on soil formation and the uncertainty associated with model fitting. However, for prediction purposes, the RMSE is well known to underestimate model uncertainty. In this work we re-evaluate a widely used transfer function for mean annual precipitation (MAP) based on the chemical index of alteration minus potassium (CIA-K) using data science best practices on two continental-scale soil data sets. Data set inter-comparisons and cross-validation of exponential regression models indicate that the root mean square prediction error (RMSPE) between CIA-K and MAP for soils representative of climates across the continental United States is around 299 mm, significantly higher than the currently accepted 182 mm RMSE. Further, CIA-K is unable to predict perhumid (>2000 mm MAP) climate zones. We show that transitioning from a simple regression framework to one of recursive partitioning via random forests can significantly increase prediction accuracy while automating variable selection. We introduce two new, widely applicable random forest models for MAP (RF-MAP) that use 10 elemental oxides as input variables and were calibrated on the Baylor University Soil Informatics (BU-SI) data set. RF-MAP version 1.0 (RF-MAP1.0) was generated using the entire BU-SI data set (n = 685) and can predict MAP values up to 6865 mm with a RMSPE of 395 mm. RF-MAP version 2.0 (RF-MAP2.0) was generated using a modification of the BU-SI data set (n = 642) and can predict MAP values up to ∼1600 mm with a RMSPE of 209 mm. Pruned regression trees provide insight into the mechanisms driving the random forest models and demonstrate the first empirical confirmation of the sensitivity of soil elemental responses to global climate zones. The RF-MAP1.0 and RF-MAP2.0 models predict MAP values comparable to independent proxy estimates for a range of deep-time paleosols. We advocate for application of RF-MAP1.0 in settings where no a priori information on paleoclimate is available, and encourage the use of either RF-MAP1.0 or RF-MAP2.0 if users have independent constraints that paleo-MAP was below 1600 mm.

  • paleosol
  • paleoclimate proxy
  • rainfall
  • machine learning
  • weathering
  • soil
View Full Text

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Science: 319 (10)
American Journal of Science
Vol. 319, Issue 10
1 Dec 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Recursive partitioning improves paleosol proxies for rainfall
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
12 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Recursive partitioning improves paleosol proxies for rainfall
William E. Lukens, Gary E. Stinchcomb, Lee C. Nordt, David J. Kahle, Steven G. Driese, Jack D. Tubbs
American Journal of Science Dec 2019, 319 (10) 819-845; DOI: 10.2475/10.2019.01

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Recursive partitioning improves paleosol proxies for rainfall
William E. Lukens, Gary E. Stinchcomb, Lee C. Nordt, David J. Kahle, Steven G. Driese, Jack D. Tubbs
American Journal of Science Dec 2019, 319 (10) 819-845; DOI: 10.2475/10.2019.01
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • BACKGROUND
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • APPLICATION
    • CONCLUSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • REFERENCES CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Timing and Nd-Hf isotopic mapping of early Mesozoic granitoids in the Qinling Orogen, central China: Implication for architecture, nature and processes of the orogen
  • India in the Nuna to Gondwana supercontinent cycles: Clues from the north Indian and Marwar Blocks
  • Unravelling the P-T-t history of three high-grade metamorphic events in the Epupa Complex, NW Namibia: Implications for the Paleoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic evolution of the Congo Craton
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • paleosol
  • paleoclimate proxy
  • rainfall
  • machine learning
  • weathering
  • soil

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Archive

More Information

  • RSS

Other Services

  • About Us

© 2023 American Journal of Science

Powered by HighWire