Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Special Volumes and Special Issue
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • FAQ
    • Terms & Conditions for use of AJS Online
  • Instructions to Authors
    • Focus and paper options
    • Submit your manuscript
  • Site Features
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Usage Statistics
    • RSS
  • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Science
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
American Journal of Science

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Special Volumes and Special Issue
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • FAQ
    • Terms & Conditions for use of AJS Online
  • Instructions to Authors
    • Focus and paper options
    • Submit your manuscript
  • Site Features
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Usage Statistics
    • RSS
  • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • The Journal
  • Follow ajs on Twitter
  • Visit ajs on Facebook
  • Follow ajs on Instagram
Research ArticleArticles

Modeling the consequences of land plant evolution on silicate weathering

Daniel E. Ibarra, Jeremy K. Caves Rugenstein, Aviv Bachan, Andrés Baresch, Kimberly V. Lau, Dana L. Thomas, Jung-Eun Lee, C. Kevin Boyce and C. Page Chamberlain
American Journal of Science January 2019, 319 (1) 1-43; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2475/01.2019.01
Daniel E. Ibarra
* Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
** Department of Geological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: danieli@stanford.edu jeremy.caves@gmail.com aviv.bachan@gmail.com
Jeremy K. Caves Rugenstein
* Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
*** Department of Earth Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
# Present address: Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Bundesstrasse 53, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: danieli@stanford.edu jeremy.caves@gmail.com aviv.bachan@gmail.com
Aviv Bachan
** Department of Geological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: danieli@stanford.edu jeremy.caves@gmail.com aviv.bachan@gmail.com
Andrés Baresch
** Department of Geological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kimberly V. Lau
** Department of Geological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
§ Department of Earth Sciences, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California 92521, USA
## Present address: Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dana L. Thomas
** Department of Geological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
§§ Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jung-Eun Lee
§§§ Department of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences, Brown University, Rhode Island 02912, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Kevin Boyce
** Department of Geological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Page Chamberlain
* Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
** Department of Geological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

It has long been recognized that the advent of vascular plants in the Paleozoic must have changed silicate weathering and fundamentally altered the long-term carbon cycle. Carbon cycle models are frequently employed to quantify the effect of this state change in the Earth system. These models have suggested that plants likely played a key role in modulating atmospheric CO2 in the past, with the largest plant-induced changes to the system in the late Paleozoic. These studies have, for the most part, focused on the effects of plants on weathering via their impacts on the soil environment. Yet, plants also modify the hydrological cycle, which may also have had implications for global weathering. Here, we evaluate the consequences of plant evolutionary innovation that have not been previously incorporated into carbon cycle models by coupling a one-dimensional vapor transport model to a reactive transport model of silicate weathering. Using this cascade of models, we investigate: 1) how evolutionary shifts in plant transpiration may have enhanced silicate weathering through increased downwind transport of water vapor to continental interiors; 2) the importance of deeply-rooted plants and their associated microbial communities in increasing soil CO2 and weathering zone length scales; and, 3) the coupled effect of these two processes on weathering rates.

The hydrologic balance for our modeling approach is framed by energy/supply constraints (encapsulated through Budyko relationships) calibrated for minimally vegetated-, vascular plant forested-, and angiosperm-worlds. Using constraints for atmospheric vapor-transport over continents and terrestrial weathering fluxes, we find that the emergence of widespread transpiration and associated inland vapor recycling associated with the advent of deep-rooted vascular plants over the later Devonian increases weathering solute concentrations by a factor of 1.64 to 2.39 for a fixed atmospheric CO2. The later domination of ecosystems by angiosperms in the late Cretaceous and Cenozoic, and the subsequent increase in transpiration fluxes, increased weathering solute concentrations by 7 to 55 percent leading to a cumulative total increase in weathering solute concentrations by a factor of 1.70 to 2.55. Partitioning of the vapor recycling effects and feedbacks on the weathering thermodynamics indicates that 55 percent of the increases in weathering concentrations are due to the thermodynamic effects of soil CO2 with the remaining 45 percent attributable to hydrologic effects. Our estimates of the relative changes in weathering solute concentrations caused by land plant evolution are of a similar magnitude to relative flux scaling relationships implemented in existing carbon cycle models such as GEOCARBSULF (Berner, 2006), COPSE (Bergman and others, 2004), and GEOCLIM (Le Hir and others, 2011). As Phanerozoic plant evolution resulted in a more efficient generation of weathering solutes, a weaker dependence of silicate weathering on physical forcing factors such as temperature, pH of rainwater, tectonics, and prevailing lithology, must have resulted. Consequently, we postulate that terrestrial plant evolution likely contributed to a more stable climate system over the Phanerozoic.

  • silicate weathering
  • land plants
  • Phanerozoic
  • feedbacks
  • carbon cycle
View Full Text

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Science: 319 (1)
American Journal of Science
Vol. 319, Issue 1
1 Jan 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Modeling the consequences of land plant evolution on silicate weathering
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Modeling the consequences of land plant evolution on silicate weathering
Daniel E. Ibarra, Jeremy K. Caves Rugenstein, Aviv Bachan, Andrés Baresch, Kimberly V. Lau, Dana L. Thomas, Jung-Eun Lee, C. Kevin Boyce, C. Page Chamberlain
American Journal of Science Jan 2019, 319 (1) 1-43; DOI: 10.2475/01.2019.01

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Modeling the consequences of land plant evolution on silicate weathering
Daniel E. Ibarra, Jeremy K. Caves Rugenstein, Aviv Bachan, Andrés Baresch, Kimberly V. Lau, Dana L. Thomas, Jung-Eun Lee, C. Kevin Boyce, C. Page Chamberlain
American Journal of Science Jan 2019, 319 (1) 1-43; DOI: 10.2475/01.2019.01
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MODELING FRAMEWORK
    • MODEL RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • APPENDIX 1: MODEL 1 DERIVATION
    • APPENDIX 2: COMPILATION OF MODERN TRANSPIRATION MODIFICATION STUDIES
    • APPENDIX 3: DERIVATION OF NORMALIZED WEATHERING EQUATIONS
    • APPENDIX 4: SOIL CO2–PRECIPITATION RELATIONSHIP
    • APPENDIX 5: ALTERNATE BOUNDARY CONDITION EXAMPLE
    • APPENDIX 6: SENSITIVITY OF CALCULATIONS
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Phanerozoic Radiation of Ammonia Oxidizing Bacteria
  • A process-based ecosystem model (Paleo-BGC) to simulate the dynamic response of Late Carboniferous plants to elevated O2 and aridification
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Timing and Nd-Hf isotopic mapping of early Mesozoic granitoids in the Qinling Orogen, central China: Implication for architecture, nature and processes of the orogen
  • India in the Nuna to Gondwana supercontinent cycles: Clues from the north Indian and Marwar Blocks
  • Unravelling the P-T-t history of three high-grade metamorphic events in the Epupa Complex, NW Namibia: Implications for the Paleoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic evolution of the Congo Craton
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • silicate weathering
  • land plants
  • Phanerozoic
  • feedbacks
  • Carbon cycle

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Archive

More Information

  • RSS

Other Services

  • About Us

© 2023 American Journal of Science

Powered by HighWire