Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Special Volumes and Special Issue
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • FAQ
    • Terms & Conditions for use of AJS Online
  • Instructions to Authors
    • Focus and paper options
    • Submit your manuscript
  • Site Features
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Usage Statistics
    • RSS
  • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Science
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
American Journal of Science

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Special Volumes and Special Issue
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • FAQ
    • Terms & Conditions for use of AJS Online
  • Instructions to Authors
    • Focus and paper options
    • Submit your manuscript
  • Site Features
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Usage Statistics
    • RSS
  • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • The Journal
  • Follow ajs on Twitter
  • Visit ajs on Facebook
  • Follow ajs on Instagram
Research ArticleArticles

An evaluation of sedimentary molybdenum and iron as proxies for pore fluid paleoredox conditions

Dalton S. Hardisty, Timothy W. Lyons, Natascha Riedinger, Terry T. Isson, Jeremy D. Owens, Robert C. Aller, Danny M. Rye, Noah J. Planavsky, Christopher T. Reinhard, Ben C. Gill, Andrew L. Masterson, Dan Asael and David T. Johnston
American Journal of Science May 2018, 318 (5) 527-556; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2475/05.2018.04
Dalton S. Hardisty
* Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
** Department of Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: dhardisty@whoi.edu
Timothy W. Lyons
*** Department of Earth Sciences, University of California-Riverside, Riverside, California 92521, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natascha Riedinger
**** Boone Pickens School of Geology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74075, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Terry T. Isson
§ Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeremy D. Owens
§§ Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Science, National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32310, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert C. Aller
§§§ School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Danny M. Rye
§ Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Noah J. Planavsky
§ Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher T. Reinhard
§§§§ School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30318, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ben C. Gill
‡ Department of Geosciences, Virginia Polytechnic and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew L. Masterson
‡‡ Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dan Asael
§ Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David T. Johnston
‡‡‡ Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Iron speciation and trace metal proxies are commonly applied together in efforts to identify anoxic settings marked by the presence of free sulfide (euxinia) or dissolved iron (ferruginous) in the water column. Here, we use a literature compilation from modern localities to provide a new empirical evaluation of coupled Fe speciation and Mo concentrations as a proxy for pore water sulfide accumulation at non-euxinic localities. We also present new Fe speciation, Mo concentration, and S isotope data from the Friends of Anoxic Mud (FOAM) site in Long Island Sound, which is marked by pore water sulfide accumulation of up to 3 mM beneath oxygen-containing bottom waters. For the operationally defined Fe speciation scheme, ‘highly reactive’ Fe (FeHR) is the sum of pyritized Fe (Fepy) and Fe dominantly present in oxide phases that is available to react with pore water sulfide to form pyrite. Observations from FOAM and elsewhere confirm that Fepy/FeHR from non-euxinic sites is a generally reliable indicator of pore fluid redox, particularly the presence of pore water sulfide. Molybdenum (Mo) concentration data for anoxic continental margin sediments underlying oxic waters but with sulfidic pore fluids typically show authigenic Mo enrichments (2–25 ppm) that are elevated relative to the upper crust (1–2 ppm). However, compilations of Mo concentrations comparing sediments with and without sulfidic pore fluids underlying oxic and low oxygen (non-euxinic) water columns expose non-unique ranges for each, exposing false positives and false negatives. False positives are most frequently found in sediments from low oxygen water columns (for example, Peru Margin), where Mo concentration ranges can also overlap with values commonly found in modern euxinic settings. FOAM represents an example of a false negative, where, despite elevated pore water sulfide concentrations and evidence for active Fe and Mn redox cycling in FOAM sediments, sedimentary Mo concentrations show a homogenous vertical profile across 50 cm depth at 1 to 2 ppm. A diagenetic model for Mo provides evidence that muted authigenic enrichments are derived from elevated sedimentation rates. Consideration of a range of additional parameters, most prominently pore water Mo concentration, can replicate the ranges of most sedimentary Mo concentrations observed in modern non-euxinic settings. Together, the modern Mo and Fe data compilations and diagenetic model provide a framework for identifying paleo-pore water sulfide accumulation in ancient settings and linked processes regulating seawater Mo and sulfate concentrations and delivery to sediments. Among other utilities, identifying ancient accumulation of sulfide in pore waters, particularly beneath oxic bottom waters, constrains the likelihood that those settings could have hosted organisms and ecosystems with thiotrophy at their foundations.

  • paleoredox
  • iron speciation
  • molybdenum
  • pore water sulfide
  • Long Island Sound
View Full Text

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Science: 318 (5)
American Journal of Science
Vol. 318, Issue 5
1 May 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
An evaluation of sedimentary molybdenum and iron as proxies for pore fluid paleoredox conditions
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
An evaluation of sedimentary molybdenum and iron as proxies for pore fluid paleoredox conditions
Dalton S. Hardisty, Timothy W. Lyons, Natascha Riedinger, Terry T. Isson, Jeremy D. Owens, Robert C. Aller, Danny M. Rye, Noah J. Planavsky, Christopher T. Reinhard, Ben C. Gill, Andrew L. Masterson, Dan Asael, David T. Johnston
American Journal of Science May 2018, 318 (5) 527-556; DOI: 10.2475/05.2018.04

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
An evaluation of sedimentary molybdenum and iron as proxies for pore fluid paleoredox conditions
Dalton S. Hardisty, Timothy W. Lyons, Natascha Riedinger, Terry T. Isson, Jeremy D. Owens, Robert C. Aller, Danny M. Rye, Noah J. Planavsky, Christopher T. Reinhard, Ben C. Gill, Andrew L. Masterson, Dan Asael, David T. Johnston
American Journal of Science May 2018, 318 (5) 527-556; DOI: 10.2475/05.2018.04
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • BACKGROUND AND PROXY FRAMEWORK
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Timing and Nd-Hf isotopic mapping of early Mesozoic granitoids in the Qinling Orogen, central China: Implication for architecture, nature and processes of the orogen
  • India in the Nuna to Gondwana supercontinent cycles: Clues from the north Indian and Marwar Blocks
  • Unravelling the P-T-t history of three high-grade metamorphic events in the Epupa Complex, NW Namibia: Implications for the Paleoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic evolution of the Congo Craton
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • paleoredox
  • iron speciation
  • molybdenum
  • pore water sulfide
  • Long Island Sound

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Archive

More Information

  • RSS

Other Services

  • About Us

© 2023 American Journal of Science

Powered by HighWire