Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Special Volumes and Special Issue
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • FAQ
    • Terms & Conditions for use of AJS Online
  • Instructions to Authors
    • Focus and paper options
    • Submit your manuscript
  • Site Features
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Usage Statistics
    • RSS
  • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Science
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
American Journal of Science

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Special Volumes and Special Issue
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • FAQ
    • Terms & Conditions for use of AJS Online
  • Instructions to Authors
    • Focus and paper options
    • Submit your manuscript
  • Site Features
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Usage Statistics
    • RSS
  • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • The Journal
  • Follow ajs on Twitter
  • Visit ajs on Facebook
  • Follow ajs on Instagram
Research ArticleArticles

Assessing the magmatic affinity and petrogenesis of granitoids at the giant Aktogai porphyry Cu deposit, Central Kazakhstan

Ming-Jian Cao, Guang-Ming Li, Ke-Zhang Qin, Noreen J. Evans and Eleonora Yusupovha Seitmuratova
American Journal of Science September 2016, 316 (7) 614-668; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2475/07.2016.02
Ming-Jian Cao
* Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 9825, Beijing 100029, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: caomingjian@mail.iggcas.ac.cn lgm@mail.iggcas.ac.cn
Guang-Ming Li
* Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 9825, Beijing 100029, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: caomingjian@mail.iggcas.ac.cn lgm@mail.iggcas.ac.cn
Ke-Zhang Qin
* Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 9825, Beijing 100029, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Noreen J. Evans
** John de Laeter Center, TIGeR, Department of Applied Geology, Curtin University, Perth Western Australia, Australia 6945
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eleonora Yusupovha Seitmuratova
*** Laboratory of Geological Formations, K. Satpaev Institute of Geological Sciences, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Most mineralized porphyries associated with large to giant oxidized porphyry Cu deposits show an affinity with high Sr/Y rocks, while barren or weakly mineralized granitoids show typical low Sr/Y features. The Aktogai giant porphyry Cu deposit occurs in the Koldar pluton and provides a good natural laboratory in which to investigate this relationship, while determining the petrogenesis of the pluton and its mineralization. Zircon U-Pb dating, mineral chemistry, whole rock geochemistry and Sr-Nd-Pb and zircon Hf-O isotopic analyses were carried out on the pre-ore granodiorite (the major component of the Koldar pluton) and on the mineralized granodiorite porphyry. Zircon U-Pb ages indicate that the pre-ore granodiorite and mineralized granodiorite porphyries were emplaced at 345 and 328 to 331 Ma, respectively. Distinctly higher apatite SO3 contents in the granodiorite porphyry relative to the granodiorite suggest an increase in fO2 during the petrogenesis of the mineralized porphyries (>NNO+1). Although all rocks share similar geochemical characteristics (calc-alkaline, strong depletion in Nb, Ta and Ti, and enrichment in LREE and LILE), the pre-ore Koldar pluton has normal arc related magmatic features [low Sr/Y and (La/Yb)N, high Y and YbN], while the granodiorite porphyries and diorite (trace component of Koldar pluton) exhibit high Sr/Y and (La/Yb)N, low Y and YbN features. All samples show similar Sr-Nd-Pb-Hf-O isotopic compositions [(87Sr/86Sr)i = 0.70369 to 0.70413, εNd (t) = + 3.6 to + 5.6, (206Pb/204Pb)i = 18.16 to 19.32, zircon εHf (t) = + 11.8 to + 15.9, and δ18O = + 3.8 to + 5.9 ‰], and very young whole rock T2DM (Nd) (640 – 680 Ma) and zircon TDMC (Hf) (320 – 590 Ma) values, suggesting that they were probably derived from partial melting of juvenile lower crust. Geochemical patterns and partial melt modeling indicate that the high Sr/Y rocks were probably formed by partial melting of eclogitized, thickened lower crust, while the Koldar pluton formed by partial melting of normal thick lower crust. We propose that pre-ore low Sr/Y rocks were probably generated earlier via subduction of Junggar-Balkhash oceanic crust, and that the high Sr/Y rocks were formed later by partial melting of sulfide-enriched, thickened juvenile lower crust. High oxygen fugacity and the high melting temperature of the high Sr/Y rocks ensured that all sulfide was dissolved in the magma, which intruded the previously emplaced low Sr/Y pluton and resulted in significant mineralization.

  • normal arc magmatism
  • high Sr/Y rocks
  • thickened lower crust
  • Aktogai porphyry Cu deposit
  • Central Kazakhstan
View Full Text

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Science: 316 (7)
American Journal of Science
Vol. 316, Issue 7
1 Sep 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessing the magmatic affinity and petrogenesis of granitoids at the giant Aktogai porphyry Cu deposit, Central Kazakhstan
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Assessing the magmatic affinity and petrogenesis of granitoids at the giant Aktogai porphyry Cu deposit, Central Kazakhstan
Ming-Jian Cao, Guang-Ming Li, Ke-Zhang Qin, Noreen J. Evans, Eleonora Yusupovha Seitmuratova
American Journal of Science Sep 2016, 316 (7) 614-668; DOI: 10.2475/07.2016.02

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Assessing the magmatic affinity and petrogenesis of granitoids at the giant Aktogai porphyry Cu deposit, Central Kazakhstan
Ming-Jian Cao, Guang-Ming Li, Ke-Zhang Qin, Noreen J. Evans, Eleonora Yusupovha Seitmuratova
American Journal of Science Sep 2016, 316 (7) 614-668; DOI: 10.2475/07.2016.02
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • GEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND
    • PETROGRAPHY
    • ANALYTICAL METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • APPENDIX
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Timing and Nd-Hf isotopic mapping of early Mesozoic granitoids in the Qinling Orogen, central China: Implication for architecture, nature and processes of the orogen
  • India in the Nuna to Gondwana supercontinent cycles: Clues from the north Indian and Marwar Blocks
  • Unravelling the P-T-t history of three high-grade metamorphic events in the Epupa Complex, NW Namibia: Implications for the Paleoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic evolution of the Congo Craton
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • normal arc magmatism
  • high Sr/Y rocks
  • thickened lower crust
  • Aktogai porphyry Cu deposit
  • Central Kazakhstan

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Archive

More Information

  • RSS

Other Services

  • About Us

© 2023 American Journal of Science

Powered by HighWire