Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Special Volumes and Special Issue
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • FAQ
    • Terms & Conditions for use of AJS Online
  • Instructions to Authors
    • Focus and paper options
    • Submit your manuscript
  • Site Features
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Usage Statistics
    • RSS
  • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Science
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
American Journal of Science

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Special Volumes and Special Issue
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • FAQ
    • Terms & Conditions for use of AJS Online
  • Instructions to Authors
    • Focus and paper options
    • Submit your manuscript
  • Site Features
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Usage Statistics
    • RSS
  • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • The Journal
  • Follow ajs on Twitter
  • Visit ajs on Facebook
  • Follow ajs on Instagram
Research ArticleARTICLES

The Archean-Proterozoic boundary: 500 my of tectonic transition in Earth history

Kent C. Condie and Craig O’Neill
American Journal of Science November 2010, 310 (9) 775-790; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2475/09.2010.01
Kent C. Condie
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Craig O’Neill
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Changes in the solid Earth at the end of the Archean fall into two categories. First are those related to cooling of the mantle and include a decrease in both komatiite abundance and MgO content, a decrease in Ni/Fe ratio in banded iron formation, and increases in incompatible element ratios (such as Nb/Yb, La/Yb, Zr/Y, La/Sm and Gd/Yb) in non-arc type basalts. A second group of changes is related to the extraction of continental crust from the mantle and stabilization of major cratons at 2.7 to 2.5 Ga. These include an increase in Nb/Th ratio and εNd(T) of non-arc basalts; significant increases in large-ion lithophile and high-field strength elements and a decrease in Sr in continental crust, which reflect a shift in magma types from TTG (tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite) to calc-alkaline; a prominent increase in the maximum values of δ18O of zircons from granitoids after the end of the Archean; a major peak in gold reserves is found at or near 2.7 Ga; and a peak in Re/Os depletion ages from mantle xenoliths at 2.7 Ga consistent with widespread thickening of the continental lithosphere at this time.

All of these changes may be related to the widespread propagation of plate tectonics at the end of the Archean. Subduction produces continental crust in numerous arcs, which rapidly collide to form supercratons. Oceanic slabs sinking into the deep mantle could increase the production rate of mantle plumes, as well as increase the heat flux from the core, which warms the newly arrived slabs. The cooling of the deep mantle would begin after 2.5 Ga and continue until about 2.4 Ga when a 200-My slowdown in plate tectonics begins. This may be the reason for the rapid drop in temperature of the mantle recorded by basalts and komatiites. When plate tectonics comes back on track at about 2.2 Ga, Archean supercratons break up and are dispersed.

View Full Text

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Science
Vol. 310, Issue 9
November 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Archean-Proterozoic boundary: 500 my of tectonic transition in Earth history
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 14 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Archean-Proterozoic boundary: 500 my of tectonic transition in Earth history
Kent C. Condie, Craig O’Neill
American Journal of Science Nov 2010, 310 (9) 775-790; DOI: 10.2475/09.2010.01

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Archean-Proterozoic boundary: 500 my of tectonic transition in Earth history
Kent C. Condie, Craig O’Neill
American Journal of Science Nov 2010, 310 (9) 775-790; DOI: 10.2475/09.2010.01
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Petrogenesis and tectonic settings of Proterozoic mafic magmatism from the northern Indian Shield and the Himalaya: possible role for interaction of mantle plume with the subcontinental lithospheric mantle
  • Constraining crustal silica on ancient Earth
  • When was the Earths conveyor belt set in motion?
  • Section 9. The Emerging Picture
  • Growth of continental crust: a balance between preservation and recycling
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Timing and Nd-Hf isotopic mapping of early Mesozoic granitoids in the Qinling Orogen, central China: Implication for architecture, nature and processes of the orogen
  • India in the Nuna to Gondwana supercontinent cycles: Clues from the north Indian and Marwar Blocks
  • Unravelling the P-T-t history of three high-grade metamorphic events in the Epupa Complex, NW Namibia: Implications for the Paleoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic evolution of the Congo Craton
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Archive

More Information

  • RSS

Other Services

  • About Us

© 2023 American Journal of Science

Powered by HighWire