Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Special Volumes and Special Issue
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • FAQ
    • Terms & Conditions for use of AJS Online
  • Instructions to Authors
    • Focus and paper options
    • Submit your manuscript
  • Site Features
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Usage Statistics
    • RSS
  • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Science
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
American Journal of Science

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Special Volumes and Special Issue
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • FAQ
    • Terms & Conditions for use of AJS Online
  • Instructions to Authors
    • Focus and paper options
    • Submit your manuscript
  • Site Features
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Usage Statistics
    • RSS
  • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • The Journal
  • Follow ajs on Twitter
  • Visit ajs on Facebook
  • Follow ajs on Instagram
OtherArticles

The structure and emplacement of cinder cone fields

M. Settle
American Journal of Science December 1979, 279 (10) 1089-1107; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.279.10.1089
M. Settle
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Terrestrial cinder cone fields generally occur in two types of volcanic provinces, either: (1) upon the flanks of major volcanoes, or (2) within relatively flat-lying volcanic fields. Measurements of cone shape and distribution have been performed in three volcano cone fields (Mauna Kea, Hawaii; Mt. Etna, Italy; Kilimanjaro, Tanzania) and three platform cone fields (San Francisco Mtn., Ariz.; Paricutin region, Mexico; Nunivak Island, Alaska). Modal average values of cone basal diameter are on the order of 300 to 400 m within volcano cone fields and 900 to 1000 m within platform cone fields. Cone height/diameter ratios are generally smaller within the platform cone fields. Variations in cone shape cannot be directly attributed to different eruption conditions, however, since cone morphometry is also a function of weathering environment and exposure age. Modal average values of cone separation distance range from 600 to 800 m within volcano cone fields to 1000 to 1200 m within platform cone fields. Comparison of average morphometric parameters for the six fields indicates that cone diameter is positively correlated with cone separation distance. Furthermore, the size (diameter) and spacing of cinder cones formed on the flanks of volcanoes is generally less than the size and spacing of cones constructed in volcanic fields. Historical observations indicate that flank eruptions commonly shift to higher or lower elevations in response to variations in magmatic pressure. Such shifts would tend to limit the growth of individual cones and would also result in smaller separation distances between cones. Comparable variations in vent location are less likely to occur within volcanic fields due to smaller regional topographic differences and the general lack of regional rift zones.

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Science
Vol. 279, Issue 10
1 Dec 1979
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The structure and emplacement of cinder cone fields
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Science
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Science web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The structure and emplacement of cinder cone fields
M. Settle
American Journal of Science Dec 1979, 279 (10) 1089-1107; DOI: 10.2475/ajs.279.10.1089

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The structure and emplacement of cinder cone fields
M. Settle
American Journal of Science Dec 1979, 279 (10) 1089-1107; DOI: 10.2475/ajs.279.10.1089
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Morphometric analysis of scoria cones: the potential for inferring process from shape
  • THE DEPOSITIONAL RECORD OF SMALL, MONOGENETIC VOLCANOES WITHIN TERRESTRIAL BASINS
  • Structure and age of volcanic fissures on Mount Morning: A new constraint on Neogene to contemporary stress in the West Antarctic Rift, southern Victoria Land, Antarctica
  • The Valle de Bravo Volcanic Field: Geology and geomorphometric parameters of a Quaternary monogenetic field at the front of the Mexican Volcanic Belt
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Timing and Nd-Hf isotopic mapping of early Mesozoic granitoids in the Qinling Orogen, central China: Implication for architecture, nature and processes of the orogen
  • India in the Nuna to Gondwana supercontinent cycles: Clues from the north Indian and Marwar Blocks
  • Unravelling the P-T-t history of three high-grade metamorphic events in the Epupa Complex, NW Namibia: Implications for the Paleoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic evolution of the Congo Craton
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Archive

More Information

  • RSS

Other Services

  • About Us

© 2023 American Journal of Science

Powered by HighWire