| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
* Department of Earth Science and Department of Chemistry, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston, Texas 77005; aluttge{at}mail.rice.edu
** Center for Biological and Environmental Nanotechnology, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005
*** Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, 223 Science Hall, 3651 Trousdale Parkway, Los Angeles, California 90089
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF...MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS IN...RESULTS FROM MONTE CARLO...SUMMARY OF MODEL RESULTS,...CONCLUSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
This paper seeks to highlight some interesting questions and problems of microbial participation in mineral-water interactions and to present a modeling strategy that may help to study this exciting topic. Out of a voluminous body of work whose diversity of results underscores the complexity in the study of microbe-mineral interactions, we have chosen and briefly reviewed three recent experimental studies that have explored different aspects of the interaction between microbes and mineral surfaces. In the second part of this paper, we introduce a complementary approach that uses parameterized Monte Carlo simulations to explore and quantify crystal dissolution kinetics. This tool has already yielded considerable success in delineating abiotic water-mineral interactions, and we demonstrate here how it can be extended to the study of microbe-water-rock interactions. Finally, we discuss possibilities as to how this approach could be improved and simulation predictions tested in future laboratory work.
|
INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF SELECTED PAPERS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF...MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS IN...RESULTS FROM MONTE CARLO...SUMMARY OF MODEL RESULTS,...CONCLUSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
In modern societies, problems of water and soil pollution, loss of soil, secure strategies of waste deposition, remediation of contaminated sites, and the increasing threat of climate change have forced large parts of the scientific community to refocus and develop new strategies in their research. One of the results was the new interdisciplinary approach mentioned above. The success of this approach is documented in the ever-increasing number of observations and data that provide evidence of rapid progress in our understanding of the importance of microbial interaction in geologic systems (for an overview, see Banfield and Nealson, 1997; Warren, 2004, and contributions therein). Virtually all interactions between organisms and minerals begin at the mineral surface. The study of these interactions in aqueous environments must by necessity involve an understanding of how microorganisms alter the physics and chemistry of contact between mineral and aqueous solution. Consequently, this alteration will change the kinetics of mineral dissolution and growth.
Our present study is directed towards this task. In the following, we review three recent experimental studies that have investigated different aspects of microbe-mineral interactions: surface recognition, attachment and interaction with the mineral surface. Based on the results of the direct experimental observations we then introduce a stochastic modeling approach using parameterized Monte Carlo techniques to explore effects of microbial alteration on mineral dissolution kinetics.
In general, one can look at the mineral world with regard to two major processes: mineralization and dissolution. In principle, and in fact, both processes occur abiotically and biotically, but the rates in the presence of the proper biotic catalysis can be orders of magnitude faster than the abiotic rates (for example, Barker and others, 1998). While both processes are of great interest and importance (for example, see Dove and others, 2003), we have focused our efforts to this point on the dissolution side (that is, the corrosion of metals and metal oxides, and the dissolution of minerals in the presence and absence of microorganisms). The work includes both experimental measurements as well as modeling approaches using Monte Carlo simulations, with the goal of understanding the quantitative importance of the biotic influences, as well as the qualitative differences that occur—observations that might provide clues to similar processes that have occurred in the geological past. This focus is in no way intended as a ranking of approaches; complementary modeling strategies such as molecular dynamics calculations and quantum mechanical approaches are equally important and have produced valuable results. Some of these results are reported in the present volume with an emphasis on metal adsorption on outer cell membranes (for example, Fein, 2000; Frost and others, 2003; Borrok and Fein, 2004; Borrok and others, 2004). Finally, model predictions need to be tested both experimentally and through field studies, and we therefore advocate a combination of modeling and experimental efforts.
It is well known that naturally occurring rocks, minerals, and glasses, as well as man-made materials such as ceramics and metal products, contain significant amounts of components that can be utilized as nutrients by (micro-)organisms (Lovley and Phillips, 1988; Rogers and others, 1998; Lovley, 2000) and plants (for example, Berner, 1992). Common examples are phosphate and metal oxides. During the "mining" of this vast source of nutrients from rocks and minerals, microbes often extract these molecules from the bulk solid structure. As a result of this action they destroy the mineral, glass, or metal in its existing form and mobilize the components (for example, Leyval and Berthelin, 1991; and Hinsinger and others, 1992). This biological activity has the potential to change or even completely override the abiotically controlled kinetics and cause significantly enhanced mineral dissolution and metal corrosion rates (for example, Barker and others, 1997, and references therein; Lüttge and Conrad, 2004; and Davis and others, 2004).
Microbial Attachment
One assumption has been that an important aspect of the participation of microbes in mineral-fluid interactions is the attachment of microbes at the surface. Much research has been conducted with respect to both the microbiology and geochemistry of the attachment problem, although only a few studies, however, have focused on the direct participation and quantification of microbes in mineral-water interactions. Therefore, while increasing (see for example, Kendall and Hochella, 2003), our knowledge is still limited and often speculative. An important prerequisite for major progress in this matter is insight into questions of surface recognition and attachment of microbes. How does a microbe recognize a crystalline surface that is characterized not only by its chemical composition but also by microtopography, different energetic sites, and heterogeneous composition? What factors conspire to make attachment an active rather than a passive process? Once recognition is achieved, how does the organism attach to such a water-mineral interface?
By asking the latter question, we note that crystal surfaces in contact with an aqueous solution are not static but highly dynamic systems at the molecular scale. Dynamic processes, that is, formation and breakage of bonds, molecule movement via surface diffusion, movement of kink sites and steps at the fluid-solid interface are common basic processes that continually change the crystal surface and its topography at a range of length scales, particularly at disequilibrium conditions (for example, Lasaga, 1998). Despite this constantly changing surface, we have indicators in some cases that direct contact between microbes, for example dissimilatory metal reducing bacteria, and the solid mineral surface is required (Arnold and others, 1988; Myers and Nealson, 1988; Lovley and others, 1991; Nevin and Lovley, 2000). On the other hand, Rosso and others (2003) show experimental evidence for non-local dissolution effects, that is, dissolution features that are distant from the microbes on iron-oxide surfaces. To this end, one must always distinguish between direct and indirect effects –that are the result of direct microbial intervention via contact-mediated catalysis, and those that are mediated by metabolites (acids, bases, ligands, or redox-active compounds) excreted by microbes.
In the following, we compare and contrast three experimental studies that have provided glimpses of the complex picture. Many experiments have been performed with Geobacter and Shewanella sp. (for example, S. oneidensis MR1 or S. putrefaciens CN32)1 and a limited number of other microorganisms. Because there are only a few such model systems available, it is difficult to generalize these results. However, from the preliminary work, it is already clear that microorganisms may have a significant influence on crystal dissolution and growth kinetics and, therefore, on related macroscopic processes. Perhaps of more importance is the fact that in the "real world", only a small percentage of microbes that can be observed have been cultivated, so the range of other possible reactions (and thus mechanisms) remains a matter of speculation at this point.
Forces Between Shewanella and Metal Oxide Surfaces
A milestone in our understanding of microbe-solid interaction is the work by Lower and others, (2001). In this study, the authors have measured the forces and changes of forces between living Shewanella MR-1 cells and (010) surfaces of goethite (
-FeOOH) and diaspore (-AlOOH). Their in situ measurements with a biological force microscope (for example, Lower and others, 2000) in aerobic and anaerobic solutions showed that the forces [in pN] and therefore the energies [in attoJoules] between MR-1 cells and the crystal surface changed during contact times of 0 to 45 minutes. Goethite and diaspore surfaces caused different results. While the measured forces changed significantly in the presence of a goethite surface, they were "indifferent" in the presence of diaspore when an anaerobic solution was oxygenated. Experiments with nonviable cells showed attractive forces (tens of pN) between cells and goethite but no change of forces when changing anaerobic into aerobic conditions.
Lower and others concluded from their experimental results that Shewanella MR-1 is capable of recognizing crystal surfaces. Furthermore, MR-1 seemed to be able to modify the molecular arrangement at its outer cell membrane and react to molecular configurations present at the crystal surface. This study is a strong argument for microbial recognition of mineral surfaces and microbe response to these surfaces.
Nonlocal Bacterial Electron Transfer
Rosso and others, (2003) performed an experimental study at strictly anoxic conditions in which they demonstrated that Shewanella putrefaciens CN32 dissolves the basal surfaces of hematite plates, a Fe(III) oxide (Fe2O3), at locations that are not identical with points of microbial attachment. This observation is important because it demonstrates that direct contact between the crystal surface and the microbe is not required for the electron transfer to the oxide surface.
In a sequence of AFM images, Rosso and others were able to show that the hematite surface would dissolve "at the apices of growth centers" and through "structurally controlled etch channels". Another interesting observation was that the distribution of microbes on the crystal surface did not correlate with the microtopography of the surface. This result leads to the conclusion that reduction of Fe(III) in the crystal surface is not restricted to the areas of direct cell-surface contact.
The requirement for direct contact between cell and surface is indeed a key question for conceptual models and computer simulations. At least in some cases, such a requirement would necessitate the task of conceptually understanding microbial attachment within a highly dynamic crystal surface environment (see discussion below). Before Rosso’s study, direct contact was certainly the prevailing conceptual model even if it could not be confirmed successfully experimentally (Rosso and others, 2003). The discovery of a link between a biosynthesized quinone that serves as an extracellular electron shuttle and the dissimilatory reduction of various electron acceptors by Newman and Kolter, (2000) had already opened up a route for an alternative pathway of Fe(III) reduction and therefore for an alternative explanation. The experimental results reviewed here have demonstrated that such an alternative pathway does not require the direct contact between the cell and the surface, but these results do not exclude the possibility of such a pathway in other cases. Lüttge and Conrad (2004), and Davis and others (2004) have shown experimental evidence of a dissolution reaction between a microorganism and a crystal surface that occurs only at the contact regime with the attached microbe. We review this study next.
Excavation of Non-Metal Oxide Surfaces
Results of an experimental study published by Lüttge and Conrad (2004) show some different results. While Lower and others (2001) were fully aware that crystal surfaces are characterized by their microtopography and dislocation content, their study was not designed to address this issue. Lüttge and Conrad chose a different experimental approach using vertical scanning interferometry (VSI) to explore whether Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 would recognize not only the crystal surface but also certain high energy sites at the surface. Real crystals contain a large number of various lattice defects, that is, dislocations. The outcrops of line defects such as screw-dislocations are high energy sites and serve as centers for etch pit development in crystal dissolution. The question is if microorganisms such as MR-1 are able to recognize these sites that are distinctly larger than kink-sites at the single-molecular scale.
VSI and PSI (phase shifting interferometry) are relatively new, minimally invasive techniques in geochemical and geomicrobiological studies (for an in depth description see for example Lüttge and others, 1999, 2003; Lüttge, 2004; Arvidson and others, 2003, 2004a; Davis and others, 2004; Scott and others, 2004). Like atomic force microscopy, the light-optical method quantifies both surface topography and changes of surface topography during a dissolution, corrosion, or growth process. The resolution is vertically in the sub-angstrom to one-nanometer scale and laterally that of the particular Mirau objective used in the experiment. Unlike AFM, microscopic interferometry techniques provide a large field of view of up to one millimeter per scan. The scan time is fast, typically on the order of seconds. Using VSI, many microorganisms can be observed at the crystal surface at the same time, and their activities that cause changes in surface topography can be monitored and precisely quantified. In most cases, changes in surface height can be measured with 1 to 2 nanometer precision, in some cases even with 0.7 angstrom precision. Figure 1 shows a typical height map of a calcite surface with etch pits measured by VSI (MicroXam MP8, ADE-Phase Shift).
|
These results contain important implications for control of crystal dissolution kinetics. Lüttge and Conrad (2004) show that Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 (i) is capable of attaching to calcite surfaces; (ii) has a higher probability of attachment to the important high energy sites at the crystal surface than to less reactive sites; and (iii) is capable of forming trenches on the calcite surface at the cell-mineral interface (fig. 2). The trenches are 130 to 140 nm deep and about a third of the microbial diameter (
400 nm, and 2 µm long). Trenches are created even if the aqueous solution is slightly oversaturated with respect to the carbonate substrate (Patch and others, 2002). At this time, it is too early to suggest that this behavior is a general pattern of microbial behavior and significantly more work needs to be done. Even if more work is necessary to evaluate the importance for natural systems quantitatively, these preliminary experimental results already indicate that microorganisms such as MR-1 potentially interfere with important abiotic water-rock reactions, and the implications of this important observation need to be taken into account.
|
|
MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS IN CRYSTAL DISSOLUTION KINETICS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF...MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS IN...RESULTS FROM MONTE CARLO...SUMMARY OF MODEL RESULTS,...CONCLUSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
Review of Previous Studies with Monte Carlo Simulations
Gilmer (1976, 1977, and 1980) has used Monte Carlo simulation techniques successfully to the study of crystal growth. Based on this work, Lasaga and Blum (1986), Blum and Lasaga (1987), and Wehrli (1989a, 1989b) utilized this powerful technique to study crystal dissolution almost two decades ago. For a comprehensive overview and in depth discussion of the approach that is complementary to molecular dynamics (MD) calculations see Lasaga (1990, 1998), see also Philpot (2004). Earlier studies explored dissolution kinetics of mineral surfaces often in relatively crude molecular block models. Since then, the rapidly increasing speed of computers and the introduction of a new theoretical concept (Lasaga and Lüttge, 2001, 2003) for the dissolution of crystalline matter have provided the basis for further progress in crystal dissolution kinetics discussed below.
The Stepwave Dissolution Model
Lasaga and Lüttge (2004a, 2004b, 2004c) have recently presented a fundamental and quantitative description of abiotic crystal dissolution kinetics (see also Lüttge, 2004; Lüttge and Lasaga, unpublished). This work is based on their so-called stepwave model (Lasaga and Lüttge, 2001, 2003). In this model, crystal dissolution and growth processes are treated conceptually in a stochastic approach as a many-body problem. This approach is different from other approaches in geochemical reaction kinetics that usually seek to identify a rate-limiting step or process, such as the formation of a precursor complex (for example, Oelkers, 2001). The new model fully incorporates the three-dimensional crystal lattice and investigates its interactions with an aqueous solution. A major result of this approach was the prediction of ‘stepwaves’ that constantly emanate from the outskirts of etch pits and then travel across the entire crystal surface. The sketch in figure 3 shows that each stepwave will lower the crystal surface by a unit step height, h. Over time, this process causes the "global" or total surface-normal retreat that represents the overall dissolution rate, R, of the crystal at a given set of parameters.
|
|
|
|
|
Monte Carlo Approach to Crystal Dissolution Kinetics—The Model
So far, we have used Monte Carlo techniques to explore the kinetics of crystal dissolution in detail. Of particular interest was the effect of strain fields on the dissolution kinetics. Such strain fields are generated by screw dislocations, and we know from experimental work of the importance of these surface features for the dissolution mechanism and rate. In addition, we have studied in detail the movement of steps across a crystal surface, the interaction of differently oriented steps with the surface and phenomena such as step bunching that can significantly slow down the overall dissolution process. The correct parameterization of Monte Carlo simulations is important, and key parameters can be often obtained from the literature or estimated in the initial approach. However, theoretical calculations using ab initio, Hartree-Fock, and density functional theory (DFT) techniques can also be used to improve the Monte Carlo simulations significantly. As an example, Xiao and Lüttge (unpublished) have generated adsorption and activation energies for breaking Si-O-Si and Si-O-Al bonds in alumino-silicates incorporating solvations shells into the calculations and immersing the atomic clusters into a dielectric continuum. The results show significantly lower energies than previously published data.
One of the important general results of these studies of crystal dissolution is the shift in our view of the function of etch pits in crystal dissolution kinetics. The key aspect is that mass removal at the etch pit itself can be insignificant compared to the total mass removal. More importantly, the etch-pit rim may be a constant source for stepwaves that constitute the majority of mass removal from the crystal surface. This concept will predictably modify our view of the reactive surface area that assumed that reactive parts of the surface were merely limited to the pits and steps while the flat terraces remained mainly inactive. All results of the abiotic studies of crystal dissolution kinetics are reported in Lasaga and Lüttge (2004a, 2004b), Lüttge (2004), Lüttge and Lasaga (unpublished), and Zhang and Lüttge (unpublished).
Microbial cells that attach to minerals, metals, and other solids produce extracellular polymers extending from the outer cell membrane, forming a biofilm (for example, Characklis and Marshall, 1990; Little and others, 1997a) give an excellent overview of the mechanism and processes of biofilm formation). This observation is of concern not only to microbiologists but also to geochemists interested in mineral-water interactions. Microbial cells within the biofilm may maintain vastly different conditions at the mineral-fluid interface with respect to pH and fluid speciation. Such different conditions, however, are likely to cause significantly different crystal dissolution behavior, not only as predicted thermodynamically from the bulk solution (Little and others, 1997a) but also as predicted by abiotic dissolution kinetics. Therefore, we seek to expand the Monte Carlo simulations based on our abiotic models. Next, we report a simple approach to incorporate local effects of microbial participation on mineral-water interactions and dissolution kinetics. That means we propose a strategy to explore and predict stochastically effects of microbial activities at the water-crystal interface. Note that this approach observes the activities at the crystal surface only and does not simulate the processes at the microbial cell membrane. Therefore, our approach is centered on the geochemical side. However, we simulate etch pit formation in an AB crystal that is no longer controlled exclusively by the interplay between the crystal lattice, its dislocations, and the abiotic aqueous solution, but also by the chemical activities of microbial cells attached to the surface. Commonly, we write an empirical rate law for the abiotic dissolution of a given crystal in the form
 | (1) |
G) is a function describing the dependence of the overall rate on the driving force of the reaction with
 | (2) |
; (that means by changing AB we are effectively changing the pH). Note that the current simple model does not contain assumptions about the microbial attachment mechanism itself. We treat this as a separate problem that will need special attention at a later time. However, we will include a crude attempt to incorporate the effect of the beginning of a biofilm. This initial stage is characterized by adsorption of organic macromolecules to the wetted crystal surface. The model calculations will explore the effect of local changes of the parameters listed above on the dissolution behavior of the entire crystal surface. We will investigate in particular the implications of the local changes on surface features such as a dislocation strain field, steps, and their movement across the crystal surface. These are critical elements in the abiotic dissolution process.
Model—Parameters, Settings, and Assumptions
Our cubic AB model uses periodic boundary conditions and assumes the presence of A-B bonds, only. Consequently, both, A-A and B-B bonds are not allowed in this simulation. This scenario is different from the one used in Lasaga and Lüttge (2004a) where an AB model was used to represent the Ca-feldspar anorthite.
Here, we are using an AB model simply to demonstrate the effect of bacterial attachment and interaction with a crystal surface. Therefore, it is justified and useful to simplify the solid model structure as much as possible, that is, only A-B bonds are allowed. The bond strength parameter AB/kT is set to 2.49. This choice is representative for some important non-silicates; carbonates for example have bond strengths between 2 and 4. In contrast, Lasaga and Lüttge (2004a, 2004b) varied the bond strength for aluminosilicates between 4 and 12.
In all calculations of the present study, the grid size is 80 x 80 molecular A and B blocks. The entire crystal surface is therefore 6,400 blocks. Next, we separate a square field of 1,600 blocks (40 x 40 molecular blocks) that represents the area of microbial cover and interaction, leaving the remaining surface with 4,800 blocks. The small area of 1,600 blocks is much smaller than an actual microbe: for example, Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 has an average size of about 2 microns length and about 500 nanometers diameter. However, this size is large enough to begin exploring the principal effects that a local area with different parameters can have on a crystal surface. Future work will modify this limitation in geometry and size. The entire solution in contact with the mineral surface is undersaturated, and the saturation state of A + B in solution in contact with the AB surface is defined by µA and µB (see Lasaga and Lüttge, 2004a).
Note that the time step between different stages of equal numbers of blocks removed is not necessarily the same. The reasons for this non-linearity of the time step is twofold: (i) to quantify the basic processes in the model such as detachment, attachment, and surface diffusion, we have introduced a general frequency factor 
(sec–1) into the calculations to set the time scale for rate constants. But
 |
t. In this uniform time unit, the numbers of different basic processes per unit time are not necessarily the same and, moreover, vary with the dissolution process. (ii) Our sequences of images below show always the net results of every 1000 molecular blocks removed. Between these stages, all three basic processes occur at the model surface. While the net result is 1000 blocks detached, the time interval is the weighted time sum of all these processes. For an in depth discussion of this effect, see Lüttge and Lasaga (unpublished). All calculations assume that the saturation state of the solution and the arrival rate of A and B molecules at the surface are constant, while the detachment rate of A and B molecules can vary according to the dissolution progress. Further, we will make the important assumption that there is always a water layer present between the microbial cell and the crystal surface that allows transport of dissolved molecules from the contact interface into the bulk solution. In short, we do not consider direct cell-mineral contact. Rosso and others (2003) have demonstrated that this is a realistic scenario. This strategy also avoids a priori assumptions of transport-limited kinetics. If dissolution kinetics do become transport controlled, this would be a result of the model calculations.
|
RESULTS FROM MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF...MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS IN...RESULTS FROM MONTE CARLO...SUMMARY OF MODEL RESULTS,...CONCLUSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
Results from Calculations Using a Flat, Undisturbed Crystal Surface
µA/kT = –9.0, µB/kT = –9.0) than the rest of the surface (µA/kT = –0.5, µB/kT = –0.5). Figures 5B–K shows the development of the pit. Figure 6 is a magnification of figure 5K (different color scheme) and shows the surface after 10,000 molecular blocks have been removed. The pit differs from those observed in the experimental studies with Shewanella MR-1 on calcite cleavage faces (compare Lüttge and Conrad, 2004). In the simulation, the rim of the pit is still active as in the abiotic, crystallographically controlled scenario, and thus the pit is spreading quickly laterally. In contrast, the large majority of pits associated with MR-1 in the calcite experiments showed a passive rim whose movement was apparently inhibited. The pits themselves showed mainly the negative body shape of the organisms (for example, fig. 7). To modify pit development and address this issue, we repeated the simulation with the following important modification.
|
|
|
µA/kT = –1.0 and µB/kT = –1.0 compared to µA/kT = –0.5 and µB/kT = –0.5 for the rest of the surface. Also, the microbe-covered area is now oval in shape and has a higher kink site density on two sides (see fig. 8). Figures 8A–L is a time sequence showing the development of the surface topography at intervals of constant mass removal (1000 molecular blocks). The area covered by our virtual "bacteria" is developing smoothly into an oval-shaped etch pit surrounded by a rim covered with C molecules. The inhibitory effect of C-molecules is strong enough so that the rounded sides of the pit representing high kink-site densities are not affected by the abiotic dissolution process. This result is in good agreement with the experimental observations. In summary, a relatively small local difference in saturation state over a crystal surface can lead to etch pits that are shaped by the inhibitory effect of molecules on the upper pit rim. These pits do not show the typical symmetry of the crystal lattice. Most importantly, this simulation shows that generation of steps and stepwaves can be suppressed by a layer of molecules that serve as inhibitors.
Results from Calculations with Reduced Bond Strength
Before we explore further the effect of microbial activity on surface features such as strain fields and steps, we want to investigate if the effect of a locally different saturation state can be repeated with lower bond strength between surface atoms. This scenario is realistic for cases where microbes would shuttle electrons to the crystal (oxide) surface as reported by Rosso and others (2003). In the following simulation, we keep the saturation state the same over the entire model surface (µB/kT = µA/kT = –2.0). In contrast to the previous simulation, we reduce the bond energy between A and B molecules within the microbe covered area to AB/kT = 2.2 compared to AB/kT = 2.49 for the rest of the surface. Figures 9A–L demonstrates that there is no significant difference on the resulting surface topography than in figures 8A–L. Local changes in both saturation state and bond strength produce similar results with respect to surface topography on dissolving mineral surfaces.
Results from Calculations Using a Flat Crystal Surface with a Local Strain Field
The preceding model results were obtained from simulations that did not consider the presence of a strain field in the crystal lattice. Dislocations are common in crystals and cause such a strain field. Therefore, it is interesting to explore the effect of a strain field that represents a line defect like a screw dislocation in our next experiments. We repeat the calculations conducted before but with the addition of a strain field. The strain energy of the screw dislocation is given by equation (Blum and Lasaga, 1987)
 | (3) |
|
Results from Calculations Using a Flat, Stepped Crystal Surface
The most important phenomenon during both crystal growth and dissolution is the movement of steps across the surface. The effect of microbial attachment was explored with a simulation and is discussed in detail below. Figures 12A–T show the results of the simulation. To the scenario of the flat surface, we have added crystallographically-oriented steps that travel across the surface. In the case of a solution that is undersaturated with respect to the solid, step movement will lower the crystal surface. All model parameters are given in the respective figure captions. As observed before in the other cases above, no new steps are generated at the etch pit created within the separate surface area that represents the microbe-mineral contact area. Steps that are present initially do travel across the surface. From previous calculations (Lasaga and Lüttge, 2004), we know that these steps would lower the surface continuously. In the case of bacteria presence, figures 12A –T show that the section of the step that travels into the zone that is covered by C-molecules stops its movement completely. The two sections of the step that can bypass this red zone (for example, figs. 12H-T) slow down significantly. In longer runs, the following step could occasionally catch up with the first one, leading to step bunching. This effect was previously observed by Lasaga and Lüttge (2004a) for the abiotic case. Step bunching delays the further movement of the steps, and slows down the overall dissolution rate of the model surface.
|
|
SUMMARY OF MODEL RESULTS, DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE FUTURE DIRECTIONS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF...MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS IN...RESULTS FROM MONTE CARLO...SUMMARY OF MODEL RESULTS,...CONCLUSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
Summary
Discussion
As already pointed out, the simulation used in the study above is quite simple and most likely an oversimplification. Therefore, we do not expect to extract any quantitative results with respect to reaction rates at this stage. However, our model calculations above have already generated interesting results that give some first insight into how bacterial attachment and interaction to crystal surfaces may impact dissolution kinetics mechanistically. An important result is that bacteria are able to form pits at the crystal surface by two simple mechanisms: (1) local decrease in free energy of the solution film in contact with the crystal surface; and (2) the weakening of certain bond strengths. A third mechanism may be the local increase or decrease in surface diffusion rate. However, results show that a biologically-controlled etch pit develops only if the molecular sites of the rim of the pit are strongly inhibited. Thus the biofilm may play a central role in localizing the pit itself. Both, the saturation state and the bond strength can be changed as a byproduct of "normal" bacterial activities, such as electron shuttling, proton pumping or production of CO2 during respiration. Although electron shuttling will change the bond strength of surface molecules, the latter two processes may change the pH of the solution. And while we have not yet studied the direct effects of pH change, the effects of changes in saturation state of the solution on crystal dissolution kinetics can be studied. The results are in good agreement with experimental results by Rosso and others (2003), Lüttge and Conrad (2004), (Davis and others 2004).
Our simulation involving a strain field in the crystal surface structure is a realistic situation. Lüttge and Conrad (2004) have shown in their experiments with Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 on calcite cleavage surfaces that MR-1 cells preferentially attach to high-energy sites at the surface and prevent the abiotic opening of almost all etch pits that would occur without the microbes being present. To this end, our model calculations further predict the formation of a deep hole inside the microbial pit (see above). This prediction should be observable and tested experimentally using AFM and SEM techniques after the microbes have been removed from their locations of attachment (for example, Buss and others, 2003). If the existence of such holes cannot be verified, we will have to modify the model and locally incorporate transport-controlled dissolution kinetics. This mechanism would also explain how the depth of a microbial pit can be controlled. This is an important question that we have not yet addressed. Experimental observations show that microbes do not entomb themselves in the crystal surface. In systematic measurements of microbial pit depths, Lüttge and Conrad (2004) showed that pits were never deeper than 150 nanometers. This result requires a kinetic mechanism that slows pit excavation at least to a rate that is equal to the surface-normal retreat of the surrounding crystal surface.
Our model calculations do not indicate any generation of steps at the outskirts of the microbial pits. Given that MR-1 attaches to high-energy sites such as the strain fields of dislocation outcrops, they occupy often the sites that are critical for the abiotic dissolution process. As discussed above, earlier model calculations and experimental studies have demonstrated that abiotically-formed pits generate stepwaves. By inhibiting the rim of biotically-formed etch pits, MR-1 prevents steps from being generated. Since this is an important mechanism in abiotic dissolution kinetics that even may control the overall rate of crystal dissolution in many cases it is important to study this effect in more detail. Of particular interest will be in situ AFM observations of the direct neighborhood of bacteria-occupied pits. If the model prediction is confirmed experimentally, and the formation of stepwaves at the pit wall is indeed successfully inhibited, we will have to face the possibility that microbial attachment can change dissolution rates dramatically. First experimental results by Lüttge and Conrad (2004) point in this direction. Despite these observations this result is still somewhat speculative but would have potentially large impact on weathering rates and other important geochemical processes.
Finally, our model results show that the steps and step velocities themselves can be influenced significantly by microbial attachment. This result is of significant importance to crystal dissolution kinetics. The fact that straight steps may be irreversibly transformed into rough, curved steps with high dislocation densities deserves further attention (Lüttge and Arvidson, unpublished). Here, we appreciate the fact that microbial attachment may not only influence step velocities but also may cause bunching and irreversible breakup of steps. The interplay of these changes in terms of the overall dissolution rate will be evaluated in a subsequent paper.
Future Work
We have made some suggestions for further experimental work that could test model predictions in our discussion above. A first step towards a more realistic computer model would be the use of a "real" crystal structure. This is already possible. Lüttge and Lasaga (unpublished) have used a full albite structure for simulations of abiotic dissolution. Such a model incorporating the full crystal structure requires both significantly more computer time and data such as bond strengths, surface free energies, surface diffusion rates, and adsorption energies. These data are often already available, or can be calculated in part by ab initio and other higher-level theoretical approaches (for example, Xiao and Lüttge, 2002). Such a parameterized Monte Carlo simulation is a very powerful approach that allows a stepwise improvement of the model towards significantly more realistic conditions and longer run durations while exploring larger and large sizes of a model system. Currently, hundred-thousands or even millions of molecules can be treated. In any case, it is desirable to employ significantly larger systems. Current calculations with barite (Fewless and others, unpublished) show that a system size of 100 by 100 unit cells is realistic if a high end personal computer with about 3 GHz CPU is used. This model size allows the incorporation of screw dislocations and even a combination of steps on the model (crystal) surface. The final goal is certainly a simulation size that allows the direct comparison with atomic force and vertical scanning interferometry observations during actual experiments.
Faster computers will further improve our ability to simulate larger systems and more realistic scenarios. A network of computers or a computer cluster, in contrast, does not seem very helpful. The way the current Monte Carlo code is programmed, it takes advantage of the variable time step and generates results very efficiently. To the best of our knowledge, compartmentalizing the grid for the use of a computer cluster does not gain an advantage.
|
CONCLUSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF...MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS IN...RESULTS FROM MONTE CARLO...SUMMARY OF MODEL RESULTS,...CONCLUSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF...MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS IN...RESULTS FROM MONTE CARLO...SUMMARY OF MODEL RESULTS,...CONCLUSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF...MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS IN...RESULTS FROM MONTE CARLO...SUMMARY OF MODEL RESULTS,...CONCLUSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
Amend J. P., and Helgeson, H. C., 2000, Calculation of the standard molal thermodynamic properties of aqueous biomolecules at elevated temperatures and pressures II. Unfolded proteins: Biophysical Chemistry, v. 84, p. 105–136.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Arnold R. G., DeChristina, T. J., and Hoffman, M. R., 1988, Reductive dissolution of Fe(III) oxides by Pseudomonas sp. 200: Biotechnology and Bioengineering, v. 32, p. 1081–1096.[CrossRef]
Arvidson R. S., Ertan, I. E., Amonette, J. E., and Lüttge, A., 2003, Rates of calcite dissolution obtained by vertical scanning interferometry: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 67, p. 1623–1634.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]
Arvidson R. S., Beig, M. S., and Lüttge, A., 2004a, Single-crystal plagioclase feldspar dissolution rates measured by vertical scanning interferometry: American Mineralogist, v. 89, p. 51–56.
Arvidson R. S., Davis, K. J., Collier, M., Amonette, J. E., and Lüttge, A., 2004b, Etch pit morphology and magnesium inhibition of calcite dissolution, in Wanty, R. B., and Seal, R. R., editors: Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Water-Rock Interactions, p. 721–725.
Banfield J. F., and Hamers, R. J., 1997, Processes at minerals and surfaces with relevance to microorganisms and prebiotic synthesis, in Banfield, J. F., and Nealson, K. H., editors, Geomicrobiology: interactions between microbes and minerals: Washington, D. C., Mineralogical Society of America, Reviews in Mineralogy, v. 35, p. 81–122.
Banfield J. F., and Nealson, K. H., editors, 1997, Geomicrobiology: interactions between microbes and minerals: Washington, D. C., Mineralogical Society of America, Reviews in Mineralogy, v. 35, 448 p.
Barker W. W., Welch, S. A., and Banfield, J. F., 1997, Biogeochemical weathering of silicate minerals, in Banfield, J. F., and Nealson, K. H., editors, Geomicrobiology: interactions between microbes and minerals: Washington, D. C., Mineralogical Society of America, Reviews in Mineralogy, v. 35, p. 391–428.
Barker W. W., Welch, S. A., Chu, S., and Banfield, J. F., 1998, Experimental observations of the effects of bacteria on aluminosilicate weathering: American Mineralogist, v. 83, p. 1551–1563.[Abstract]
Berner E. K., and Berner, R. A., 1995, Water, Air, and Geochemical Cycles: New York, Prentice Hall, 376 p.
Berner R. A., 1992, Weathering, plants, and the long-term carbon cycle: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 56, p. 3225–3231.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]
–––– 2003, The rise of trees and their effects on Paleozoic atmospheric CO2 and O2: Comptes Rendus Geosciences, v. 335, p. 1173–1177.[CrossRef]
Berner R. A., and Westrich, J. T., 1985, Bioturbation and the early diagenesis of carbon and sulfur: American Journal of Science, v. 285, p. 193–206.
Blum A. E., and Lasaga, A. C., 1987, Monte Carlo simulations of surface reaction rate laws, in Stumm, W., editor, Aquatic surface chemistry: Chemical processes at the particle-water interface: New York, J. Wiley, p. 255–292.
Borrok D., and Fein, J. B., 2004, Distribution of protons and Cd between bacterial surfaces and dissolved humic substances determined through chemical equilibrium modeling: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 68, p. 3043–3052.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]
Borrok D., Fein, J. B., and Kulpa, C. F., 2004, Proton and Cd adsorption onto natural bacterial consortia: testing universal adsorption behavior: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 68, p. 3231–3238.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]
Brantley S. L., Liermann, L. J., Guynn, R. L., Anbar, A., Icopini, G. A., and Barling, J., 2004, Fe isotopic fractionation during mineral dissolution with and without bacteria: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 68, p. 3189–3204.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]
Buss H. L., Brantley, S. L., and Liermann, L. J., 2003, Nondestructive methods for removal of bacteria from silicate surfaces: Geomicrobiology Journal, v. 20, p. 25–42.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]
Characklis W. G., and Marshall, K. C., 1990, Biofilms: A basis for an interdisciplinary approach, in Characklis, W. G., and Marshall, K. C., editors, Biofilms: New York, J. Wiley and Sons, p. 3–16.
Davis K. J., and Lüttge, A., 2005, Quantifying the potential role of microbial surface colonization in determining the mechanism and rate of carbonate dissolution: American Journal of Science, v. 305, p. 727–751.
Davis K. J., Conrad, P. G., and Lüttge, A., 2004, The mechanistic consequences of microbial surface colonization on carbonate mineral dissolution, in Wanty, R. B., and Seal, R. R., II, editors: Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Water-Rock Interactions, v. 2, Saratoga Springs, New York, June 27-July 2, 2004: London, United Kingdom, Taylor and Francis Group, p. 1101–1105.
Dove P. M., De Yoreo, J. J., and Weiner, S., editors, 2003, Biomineralization: Washington, D. C., Mineralogical Society of America and Geochemical Society, Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, v. 54, 381 p.
scher, A., and Characklis, W. G., 1990, Modeling the initial events in biofilm accumulation, in Characklis, W. G., and Marshall, K. C., editors, Biofilms: New York, J. Wiley and Sons, p. 445–486.
Fein J. B., 2000, Quantifying the effects of bacteria on adsorption reactions in water–rock systems: Chemical Geology, v. 169, p. 265–280.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]
Frost P. C., Maurice, P. A., and Fein, J. B., 2003, The effect of cadmium on fulvic acid adsorption to Bacillus subtilis: Chemical Geology, v. 200, p. 217–224.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]
Gilmer G. H., 1976, Growth on imperfect crystal faces. I. Monte Carlo growth rates: Journal of Crystal Growth, v. 35, p. 15–28.[CrossRef]
–––– 1977, Computer simulation of crystal growth: Journal of Crystal Growth, v. 42, p. 3–10.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
–––– 1980, Computer models of crystal growth: Science, v. 208, p. 355–363.
Helgeson H. C., and Amend, J. P., 1994, Relative stabilities of biomolecules at high temperatures and pressures: Thermochimica Acta, v. 245, p. 89–119.[CrossRef]
Hinsinger P., Jaillard, B., and Duffery, J. E., 1992, Rapid weathering of trioctahedral mica by the roots of ryegrass: Soil Science Society of America Journal, v. 56, p. 977–982.
Jin Q., and Bethke, C. M., 2003, A new rate law describing microbial respiration: Applied and Environmental Microbiology, v. 69, p. 2340–2348.
Kendall T. A., and Hochella, M. F., Jr., 2003, Measurement and interpretation of molecular-level forces of interaction between the siderophore azotobactin and mineral surfaces: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 67, p. 3537–3546.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]
Larsen I., Little, B., Nealson, K. H., Ray, R., Stone, A., and Tian, J., 1998, Manganite reduction by Shewanella putrefaciens MR-4: American Mineralogist, v. 83, p. 1564–1572.[Abstract]
Lasaga A. C., 1990, Atomic treatment of mineral-water surface reactions, in Hochella, M. F., Jr., and White, A. F., editors, Mineral-water interface geochemistry: Washington, D. C., Mineralogical Society of America, Reviews in Mineralogy, v. 23, p. 17—85.
–––– 1998, Kinetic theory in earth sciences: Princeton Series in Geochemistry: Princeton, New Jersery, Princeton University Press, 811 p.
Lasaga A. C., and Blum, A. E., 1986, Surface chemistry, etch pits and mineral-water reactions: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 50, p. 2363–2379.[CrossRef]
Lasaga A. C., and Lüttge, A., 2001, Variation of crystal dissolution rate based on a dissolution stepwave model: Science, v. 291, p. 2400–2404.
–––– 2003, A model for crystal dissolution: European Journal of Mineralogy, v. 15, p. 603–615.
–––– 2004a, Kinetic justification of the solubility product: Application of a general kinetic dissolution model: Journal of Physical Chemistry, Part B, v. 109, p. 1635–1642.
–––– 2004b, Mineralogical approaches to fundamental crystal dissolution kinetics-Dissolution of an A3B structure: European Journal of Mineralogy, v. 16, p. 713–729.
–––– 2004c, Mineralogical approaches to fundamental crystal dissolution kinetics: American Mineralogist, v. 89, p. 527–540.
Lee S. K., and Stebbins, J. F., 1999, The degree of aluminum avoidance in aluminosilicate glasses: American Mineralogist, v. 84, p. 937–945.[Abstract]
Leyval C., and Berthelin, J., 1991, Weathering of a mica by roots and rhizospheric microorganisms of pine: Soil Science Society of America Journal, v. 55, p. 1009–1016.
Little B. J., Wagner P. A., and Lewandowski, Z., 1997a, Spatial relationships between bacteria and mineral surfaces, in Banfield, J. F., and Nealson, K. H., editors, Geomicrobiology: Interactions between and microbes and minerals: Washington, D. C., The Mineralogical Society of America, Reviews in Mineralogy, v. 35, p. 123–159.
Little B. J., Wagner, P., Hart, K., Ray, R., Lavoie, D., Nealson, K. H., and Aguilar, C., 1997b, The role of metal-reducing bacteria in microbiologically influenced corrosion: Houston, Texas, Corrosion, National Association of Corrosion Engineers, v. 97, 215, 1.
Lovley D. R., editor, 2000, Environmental microbe-metal interactions: Washington, D. C., ASM Press, 395 p.
Lovley D. R., and Phillips, E. J., 1988, Novel mode of microbial energy metabolism: Organic carbon oxidation coupled to dissimilatory reduction of iron or manganese: Applied and Environmental Microbiology, v. 51, p. 683–689.
Lovley D. R., Phillips, E. J., and Lonergan, D. J., 1991, Enzymatic versus nonenzymatic mechanisms for Fe(III) reduction in aquatic sediments: Environmental Science and Technology, v. 25, p. 1062–1067.[CrossRef]
Lower S. K., Tadanier, C. J., and Hochella, M. F., Jr., 2000, Measuring interfacial and adhesion forces between bacteria and mineral surfaces with biological force microscopy: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 64, p. 3133–3139.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]
Lower S. K., Hochella, M. F., Jr., and Beveridge, T. J., 2001, Bacterial recognition of mineral surfaces: Nanoscale interactions between Shewanella and alpha-FeOOH: Science, v. 292, p. 1360–1363.
Lüttge A., 2004, Connecting the molecular- with the macro-scale: An integrated approach towards a quantitative understanding of crystal dissolution, in Wanty, R. B., and Seal, R. R., editors, Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Water-Rock Interactions, v. 1: London, United Kingdom, Taylor and Francis Group, p. 841–844.
–––– 2004, Crystal Dissolution Kinetics studied by Vertical Scanning Interferometry (VSI) and Monte Carlo simulations: A Brief Review and Outlook, in Liu, X. Y., and De Yoreo, J. J., editors, Nanoscale structure and assembly at solid-fluid interfaces. Vol. I. Interfacial Structures versus Dynamics. Series on Nanoscience and Technologies: The Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers, v. 1, 700 p.
–––– 2005, A kinetic model of etch pit coalescence and dissolution: American Mineralogist, v. 90, p. 1776–1783.
Lüttge A., and Conrad, P. G., 2004, Bacterial control of calcite dissolution kinetics: Applied and Environmental Microbiology, v. 70, p. 1627–1637.
Lüttge A., Bolton, E. W., and Lasaga, A. C., 1999, An interferometric study of the dissolution kinetics of anorthite: The role of reactive surface area, in Canfield, D., and Boudreau, B., editors, Biogeochemical cycles and their evolution over geologic time. A special triple issue as a tribute to the career of Robert A. Berner: American Journal of Science, v. 299, p. 652–678.
Lüttge A., Winkler, U., and Lasaga, A. C., 2003, Interferometric study of the dolomite dissolution: A new conceptual model for mineral dissolution: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 67, p. 1099–1116.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]
Myers C. R., and Nealson, K. H., 1988, Bacterial manganese reduction and growth with manganese oxide as the sole electron acceptor: Science, v. 240, p. 1319–1321.
Nealson K. H., and Little, B., 1997, Breathing manganese and iron: solid-state respiration: Advances in Applied Microbiology, v. 45, p. 213–239.
Nealson K. H., and Stahl, D. A., 1997, Microorganisms and biogeochemical cycles: what can we learn from layered microbial communities? in Banfield, J. F., and Nealson, K. H., editors, Geomicrobiology: Interactions between microbes and minerals: Washington D. C., Mineralogical Society of America, Reviews in Mineralogy, v. 35, p. 1–34.
Nevin K. P., and Lovley, D. R., 2000, Lack of production of electron-shuttling compounds or solubilization of Fe(III) during reduction of insoluble Fe(III) oxide by Geobacter metallireducens: Applied and Environmental Microbiology, v. 66, p. 2248–2251.
Newman D. K., and Kolter, R., 2000, A role for excreted quinones in extracellular electron transfer: Nature, v. 405, p. 94–97.[CrossRef][Medline]
Novitsky J. A., 1981, Calcium-carbonate precipitation by marine-bacteria: Geomicrobiology, v. 2, p. 375–388.
Oelkers E., 2001, General kinetic description of multioxide silicate mineral and glass dissolution: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 65, p. 3703–3720.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]
Patch F. E., Davis, K. J., Conrad, P. G., and Lüttge, A., 2002, Microbial recognition of calcite surface microtopography: Towards an understanding of calcite dissolution rates in biological environments; abstract: GSA 2002 Fall meeting, Denver, CO., October 27–30, 2002.
Philpot M., 2004, Atomic scale modeling of the solid-liquid interface, in Liu, X. Y., and De Yoreo, J. J., editors, Nanoscale structure and assembly at solid-fluid interfaces. Vol. I. Interfacial Structures versus Dynamics, Series on Nanoscience and Technologies: The Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publisher, 700 p.
Rogers J. R., Bennett, P. C., and Choi, W. J., 1998, Feldspar as a source of nutrients for microorganisms: American Mineralogist, v. 83, p. 1532–1540.[Abstract]
Rosso K. M., Zachara, J. M., Fredrickson, J. K., Gorby, Y. A., and Smith, S. C., 2003, Nonlocal bacterial electron transfer to hematite: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 67, p. 1081–1087.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]
Royer D. L., Berner, R. A., and Beerling, D. J., 2001, Phanerozoic atmospheric CO2 change: evaluating geochemical and paleobiological approaches: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 54, p. 349–392.
Scott C. C., Lüttge, A., and Athanasiou, K. A., 2004, Development and validation of vertical scanning interferometry as a novel method for acquiring chondrocyte geometry: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part A, v. 72, p. 83–90.[CrossRef]
Tang R., Nancollas, G. H., and Orme, C. A., 2001, Mechanism of dissolution of sparingly soluble electrolytes: Journal of the American Chemical Society, v. 123, p. 5437–5443.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Tang R., Orme, C. A., and Nancollas, G. H., 2003, A new understanding of demineralization: The dynamics of brushite dissolution: Journal of Physical Chemistry, Part B, v. 107, p. 10653–10657.
–––– 2004, Dissolution of crystallites: Surface energetic control and size effect: ChemPhysChem, v. 5, p. 688–696.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Tossel J. A., 1993, Theoretical studies of the speciation of Al in F-bearing aluminosilicate glasses: American Mineralogist, v. 78, p. 16–22.[Abstract]
Vinson M. D., and Lüttge, A., 2005, Multiple Length Scale Kinetics: An integrated study of calcite dissolution rates and strontium inhibition: American Journal of Science, v. 305, p. 119–146.
Warren L. A., 2004, A special issue dedicated to microbial geochemistry: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 68, p. 3139.[CrossRef]
Wehrli B., 1989a, Monte Carlo simulations of surface morphologies during mineral dissolution: Journal of Colloid Interface Science, v. 132, p. 230–242.[CrossRef]
–––– 1989b, Surface structure and mineral dissolution kinetics: A Monte Carlo study, in Miles, D. L., editor, Water-rock interaction: WRI-6: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Water-Rock Interaction, Malvern, 3–8 August, 1989: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, A. A. Balkema, p. 751–753.
Westbroek P., 1991, Life as a geological force: dynamics of the earth: New York, W.W. Norton and Co., 240 p.
WestrichJ. T., and Berner, R. A., 1984, The role of sedimentary organic matter in bacterial sulfate reduction: The G model tested: Limnology and Oceanography, v. 29, p. 236–249.
White A. F., and Brantley, S. L., editors, 1995, Chemical weathering rates of silicate minerals: Washington, D. C., Mineralogical Society of America, Reviews in Mineralogy, v. 31, 583 p.
Xiao Y., and Lüttge, A., 2002, Solvated ab initio and density functional theory (DFT) modeling of mineral-fluid surface reactions: towards a better understanding of aluminosilicate dissolution mechanisms, (abstract): GSA 2002 Fall meeting, Denver, Colorado (October 27-30, 2002).
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
