|
|
||||||||

* Department of Earth Science, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston, Texas 77005, U.S.A
** Center for Biological and Environmental Nanotechnology, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, U.S.A
Corresponding author: K. J. Davis, kjdavis{at}rice.edu
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Importance of Microbial Attachment in Biogeochemical and Engineered Systems
Over this same period, there has evolved an increasing realization in the earth sciences that many critical geochemical mineral-surface processes are mediated by microbial activity (Banfield and others, 1998; Ehrlich, 1998; Ehrlich, 1999). While microorganisms can modify mineral reaction rates by altering the chemical environment, physical attachment to the mineral-substrate may be of the most direct consequence to surface-controlled processes. Microbes attach to mineral surfaces for a variety of reasons. First, many nutrients tend to concentrate at surfaces (ZoBell, 1943). Surface-associated bacteria are able to utilize these nutrients for growth allowing them to multiply at the solid-water interface under conditions in which they are unable to multiply in the bulk aqueous phase (Marshall, 1996). Secondly, some minerals themselves serve as energy sources for microbial metabolism. The best-known example of this is the coupling of organic carbon oxidation to the dissimilatory reduction of Fe and Mn (Lovely and Phillips, 1988; Nealson and Myers, 1992). Microbial attachment to metal oxide surfaces is often requisite for taking advantage of this metabolic pathway (Arnold and others, 1988; DiChristina and Delong, 1994), although extracellular electron shuttle compounds, such as humics (Lovley and others, 1996; Lovley and Blunt-Harris, 1999) and quinones (Newman and Kolter, 2000; Rosso and others, 2003), also play a role. Additionally, microbes colonize surfaces as a general response to a range of environmental stresses where surface attachment offers protection and the opportunity for synergistic relationships with other cells (Dawson and others, 1981; Kjelleberg and Hermansson, 1984). Whatever the primary cause of microbial attachment, surface colonization generally results in degradation of the mineral surface and a considerable increase in the total reactive surface area. During this process, microbes produce acids, bases, and ligands that interact with the mineral surface, promoting mineral dissolution and the formation of secondary mineral phases (Bennett and others, 1996; Barker and others, 1997; Ehrlich, 1998). Where conditions in the natural environment favor microbial surface colonization, microbial processes can be expected to influence observed mineral dissolution rates.
Critical Questions that Require Further Study
Resolving the role of microbial surface colonization in mediating mineral dissolution rates is requisite for understanding the reactivities of biogeochemically-significant materials. However, basic gaps in our understanding of the mechanisms by which microorganisms mediate the evolution of natural surfaces have slowed the establishment of quantitative models describing mineral weathering rates in the context of microbial attachment. Some key questions that have yet to be answered in a comprehensive manner are:
1. How do the properties of the mineral surface influence bacterial attachment? In other words, what are the surface-structural controls on bacterial attachment?
The majority of experimental work has been carried out to discern the environmental and metabolic conditions that favor microbial attachment to various substrates (Grasso and others, 1996). However, little is known about the controls exerted by the microstructure of the surface on surface colonization. Engineering studies have correlated microbial attachment with the surface roughness of industrially significant materials (Scheuerman and others, 1998). Likewise, the degree to which environmental samples are etched has been shown to affect bacterial colonization (Bennett and Hiebert, 1992; Hiebert and Bennett, 1992; Bennett and others, 1996). However, microbial interactions with specific topographic features, especially submicron features, remain largely unresolved. While atomic force microscopy (AFM) has been used with considerable success to measure forces between bacteria and various substrates (Lower and others, 2000, 2001a, 2001b), this technique has only recently been applied to discern attachment forces between bacteria and certain topographic features (Boyd and others, 2002). It is critical that such studies begin to yield a mechanistic understanding of the interaction between microbes and microtopography, so that the precise role that surface microstructure plays in directing bacterial colonization may be resolved.
2. What is the mechanism by which bacterial attachment modifies mineral dissolution rates? What are the consequences of bacterial attachment on the microtopographic features known to control abiotic dissolution rates?
Just as important as understanding microtopographical controls on surface colonization, is determining the manner by which microbial attachment, in turn, modifies the structure and development of the surface. This is especially significant given the known dependence of surface-controlled mineral reaction rates on the microstructure of the surface. Numerous AFM studies have demonstrated the dependence of layer-by-layer growth or dissolution on the formation of growth spirals and etch pits at surface defects (Gratz and others, 1993; Liang and others, 1996; Jordan and Rammensee, 1998; Pina and others, 1998; Teng and others, 1998; Davis and others, 2000; Higgins and others, 2000; Teng and others, 2000; Risthaus and others, 2001; Davis and others, 2004). The more recent use of vertical scanning interferometry (VSI) has successfully correlated observations of etch pit formation with surface normal retreat and global dissolution rates (Lüttge and others, 1999; Arvidson and others, 2003, 2004). A conceptual model for mineral dissolution has been inferred from these interferometric measurements of surface topography (Lasaga and Lüttge, 2001, 2003). The resultant comprehensive dissolution rate theory successfully integrates individual surface reactions into an overall rate. These studies provide a conceptual abiotic framework by which the biological influence on mineral-dissolution rates may be compared.
3. How does the dynamic nature of the actively dissolving mineral surface affect bacterial attachment. For instance, can the dissolving surface retreat beneath the attached bacteria, thereby enhancing the probability of detachment? Additionally, what is the relationship between mineral solubility and the role of microbial surface colonization in weathering reactions?
To date, most investigations have studied microbial attachment to either inert surfaces or slowly dissolving surfaces. The precise role of mineral solubility, and hence dissolution rate, in determining the extent and rate of microbial surface colonization is largely unknown.
Quantifying Microbe-Mineral Interactions A Challenge
Determining experimental answers to these questions has been slowed by difficulties inherent to measuring processes occurring at the microbe-mineral interface. Probing the nature of microbe-surface interactions in a quantifiable manner has principally been achieved through the use of atomic force microscopy (AFM). The power of this method lies in its ability to image live cells in situ and its exquisite spatial resolution of changes in microtopography as well as of microbial cell structure. However, this technique suffers from the invasive nature of tip-sample interactions and its limited field of view. For instance, direct measurement of global surface dissolution rates is largely unattainable using AFM. A complementary noninvasive imaging technique is needed that can both detect the microbe at the surface and quantify any resulting changes in mineral-surface topography, while maintaining both a high spatial resolution and a large field of view. Vertical scanning interferometry (VSI) meets these requirements and enables the measurement of both local dissolution (etch pits) and global dissolution rates (surface normal retreat) (Lüttge and others, 1999, 2003).
vertical scanning interferometry (vsi)
Interferometry is an optical technique that is commonly used to measure surface topography with very high precision. Interferometers produce surface height maps by splitting a beam of light exiting a single source into two separate beams. One beam is reflected from the sample surface while the other is reflected from a reference mirror. When the two beams are recombined, interference phenomena produce an interferogram consisting of fringes that reflect the topography of the sample surface. Modern interferometers use a charge coupled device (CCD) detector to register and feed the interferogram to a computer where phase-mapping programs produce a topographic image of the surface.
Vertical scanning interferometry (VSI) is a type of interferometry that is optimized for the wide dynamic range needed to image rough surfaces. It typically uses a white light illumination source, which allows for large vertical scans (up to 100 µm with better than 2 nm resolution). Since the coherence length is short due to the wide spectral bandwidth of the white-light source, good contrast fringes are only obtained when the two path lengths of the interferometer are closely matched in length. Therefore, the interferometer is aligned so that the interference intensity distribution along the vertical scanning direction has its peak (best contrast fringes) at the best focus position. While many algorithms are employed to analyze white light interferograms, all of them generally detect the coherence peak.
Although VSI is primarily used for non-destructive testing of semiconductors, it has also been used with considerable success to measure mineral-surface kinetics (Lüttge and others, 1999, 2003; Arvidson and others, 2003, 2004). This success stems from the speed, precision and versatility by which VSI produces quantitative topographic maps of the mineral surface. Images made at 50x magnification using white-light illumination provide a lateral resolution of
0.5 µm, while maintaining a vertical resolution on the order of 1 to 2 nm. The scan size at this magnification is 165 x 125 µm, a little larger than the maximum AFM scan size of 130 x 130 µm. However, interference objectives can be easily switched via a turret providing, for instance, 10x magnification with a field of view of 845 x 630 µm. When larger scan areas are needed, a "stitching" procedure can be employed in which a number of overlapping measurements are combined into one surface profile using an automated positioning stage and sub-pixel registration techniques. VSI employs a 2 µm/s vertical scan rate allowing for extremely fast data acquisition. For instance, a surface area of 1 mm2 with 20 µm of surface relief can be quantified in less than ten seconds.
Since interferometry measures relative surface height, absolute changes in mineral-surface topography must be measured relative to a reference surface. This is achieved by placing an inert mask on the surface. By measuring the average height difference between the reacted and unreacted surfaces, an absolute value of surface normal retreat may be determined. Thus, during dissolution, changes in average height 
made at time intervals
t yields a surface normal retreat velocity,
[hkl]:
![]() |
Dividing this velocity by the molar volume
(cm3/mol) gives a global dissolution rate in the familiar units of moles per unit area per unit time:
![]() |
This approach allows a simple and straightforward calculation of surface-area retreat or advance rates from measurements of average surface heights (
) (Lüttge and others, 1999). In addition to these global dissolution rates, local dissolution rates at etch pits can be quantified by monitoring changes in the volume and density of etch pits across the surface over time.
The key to achieving accurate measurements of mineral-reaction rates using this masking technique is the large vertical scan range and field of view available using VSI. For instance, AFM can in principal be used to measure surface retreat rates relative to a masked reference surface. However, the relatively small vertical scan range (
7 µm) and lateral scan size of AFM makes it impossible to achieve accurate measurements of surface reaction rates. Even using VSI it is clear that the 10x objective provides a much more accurate measurement of surface normal retreat than is determined using the 50x objective. This is because the limited field of view provided by the 50x objective is more sensitive to influences from local dissolution features and reaction artifacts associated with the mask edge.
| the application of vsi to the quantification of mineral surface dynamics in the context of microbial attachment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Here we further investigate the relationship between microbial surface colonization and mineral-surface dynamics by examining three key interactions:
A second goal of this paper is to further evaluate the applicability of VSI to the quantitative study of mineral-surface reactions in the context of microbial attachment. To this end, VSI measurements of cell and biofilm dimensions will be directly compared to those obtained using the more commonly used quantitative imaging technique, AFM.
| experimental methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mineral-Surface Selection and Preparation
Shewanella Culture Preparation and Controls
We chose Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 (formerly Shewanella putrefaciens strain MR-1) for our attachment studies due to its propensity to form biofilms, ubiquity in the natural environment, and its use as a model microbe for bioremediation studies (Tiedje, 2002). In addition, S. oneidensis exhibits both motile (flagellated) and nonmotile phases, and shares cell surface similarities with Pseudomonas, the focus of many adhesion studies (Bakke and others, 1990; Prince, 1996).
Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 cultures were obtained from Kenneth Nealsons lab (University of Southern California) and aerobically cultured in a pH 7.4, low-nutrient medium, prepared to 1L using: 200 mg yeast extract, 100 mg peptone, 10 mL 1M HEPES, 10 mL 0.2M bicarbonate and 20 mL 1M lactate. The culture was allowed to enter stationary phase as monitored by spectrophotometric absorbance measurements, with a final A600 reading of 0.15, corresponding to a cell titer of 3x108 cells/mL. Two portions of this culture were used as control solutions. The first control was a cell-free extract that was prepared through centrifugation of the culture at 9000 rpm for 30 min. The supernatant was decanted from the pellet and the centrifugation step repeated twice more. Following this procedure, the spectrophotometric absorbance A600 of the solution fell to 0. A second dead-cell control was prepared by heat-killing the cells through incubation above 45°C and below 55°C for 2.5 hours and then allowing the culture to cool and repeating the cycle two more times. The measured spectroscopic absorbance A600 of the solution fell to 0.12 during this procedure. Viability of the dead-cell control was assessed by counting the number of colony-forming units (cfu) per volume plated on Luria-Bertani (LB) agar plates. It was determined that less than 1 bacterial cell per mL of culture was microbiologically viable.
Reaction Conditions
Crystals were reacted in 100x15mm Petri dishes containing 50 mL of cell culture or control solution. The Petri dishes were placed on a platform shaker set to 25 rpm for the duration of the experiment. The lids of the dishes were left slightly ajar so that aerobic conditions were maintained throughout the experiment. For each experiment, multiple crystals of each species were reacted in each test solution. Further, each crystal had multiple masked regions for maximum internal controls. When comparing different mineral surfaces in the same test solution, all crystal species were placed in the same Petri dish and therefore exposed to the same experimental conditions. Due to the high number of complexation sites present on the microbe surfaces and organic species in solution, it was not possible to monitor calcium or carbonate species in solution during the course of the experiment. Following the 35 hour reaction period, the solutions were decanted from the Petri dishes containing the crystals and re-measured for pH and absorbance. The pH of the live Shewanella culture remained at 7.4, while the cell-free and dead-cell controls rose slightly to 7.5. The measured absorbance of the live Shewanella cultures fell to 0.11 during the experiment, most likely as a result of attachment to the crystals surfaces and the bottom of the Petri dish. The absorbance of the cell-free and dead-cell controls were measured to be the same as at the beginning of the experiments. The crystals were washed in a standardized fashion necessary for accurate cell density measurements. Each stainless steel coupon (containing the test crystal) was lodged vertically in a 15 mL centrifuge tube using a pair of tweezers. The tube was gently filled with DIW, capped, rotated end-over-end and emptied. This procedure was repeated two more times for each crystal prior to imaging.
VSI And AFM Imaging and Measurements
A commercially-available MicroXAM MP-8 (ADE Phase-shift, Tucson, AZ) vertical scanning interferometer (VSI), equipped with 10x and 50x Nikon Mirau objectives, was used to image the crystal surfaces. The 10x interferometric objective yields a 845 x 630 µm field of view, while the 50x objective allows for scan sizes of 165x124 µm. There are two basic types of images that can be generated from data sets acquired using VSI. The standard data file is a 2-dimensional (2D) topographic image similar to height images obtained using AFM, where topographic information is conveyed according to a color scale. In these images, bright colors typically indicate higher surface features on the image. The second image type used in this study is a 3-dimensional (3D) solid-model representation of the topographic information contained in the VSI data file.
Measurements of cell densities on the carbonate surfaces were made by counting the number of cells per area in randomly selected images or portions of images. Averages of at least 20 separate counts are reported in tables 1 and 2. When available, AFM observations were found to confirm the VSI cell density measurements. Global dissolution rates were measured after 35 hours for at least two masks per mineral species and for at least two crystals for each mineral species. At least ten transects were measured along each mask, paying careful attention to taking transects along a single continuous terrace to avoid error from natural surface steps.
|
|
| results and discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Surface Colonization on Carbonate Surfaces
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison of VSI and AFM Imaging Techniques and Measurements
While bacterial cell dimensions are near the lateral resolution limits of the 50X interferometric objective used in VSI, higher-resolution AFM imaging provided concise images of microbes at the mineral-surface (figs. 7 and 8A). In fact cell structures such as flagella are easily resolved using AFM (fig. 8B). However, despite the resolution difference between the two techniques, VSI measurements of cell diameter and length (fig. 9) were found to be very comparable to those measured using AFM. This is an interesting result given that the lower resolution of VSI causes the shape outline of the cells to appear somewhat diffuse. Fortunately, the optical nature of VSI that is responsible for such limitations in lateral resolution also confers certain advantages to VSI over AFM. The noninvasive nature of VSI imaging does not suffer from the tip-sample interactions inherent to AFM imaging that can cause bacterial cells to dislodge from the surface during imaging. Further, the large field of view and fast data acquisition allows VSI to quickly assess attached cell density over the entire crystal surface. Although not studied here, the large vertical scan range characteristic of VSI may even allow for the quantification of developing biofilm structures up to 100 µm above the surface. These capabilities make VSI a strong complement to the in situ high-resolution imaging abilities of AFM. The coupling of these two techniques allows for mineral-surface reactions and cell-mineral interface processes to be quantified at multiple length-scales.
|
|
|
Role of Mineral-Surface Dynamics in Surface Colonization
|
|
|
|
Role of Surface Colonization in Determining Calcite Dissolution Rate
|
|
Role of Mineral-Surface Topography in Determining Surface Colonization
|
|
|
| summary and conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, AFM and VSI were used in synergistic fashion to achieve a beginning understanding of the interplay between mineral-surface dynamics and microbial attachment. Our results indicate that when the dissolution rate of the surface is comparable to the rate of surface colonization, surface dynamics may be a significant factor in determining cell attachment. This was found to be the case for calcite where significant surface retreat resulted in reduced Shewanella surface colonization. In further support of this finding, the most dynamic areas of the surface (etch pits) were found to provide additional local barriers to cell attachment. However, the cells that did attach to the calcite surface affected surface dynamics by reducing the overall far from equilibrium dissolution rate. In contrast to the findings for calcite, dissolution features on the slower-dissolving dolomite and barite surfaces actually resulted in faster surface colonization rates by providing energetically favorable sites for cell attachment. This complicated relationship between surface colonization and mineral-surface development reinforces the central theme of biogeochemistry that the evolution of geological surfaces and biological systems are intertwined. However, the significance of these relationships to biogeochemical and engineered systems requires further investigation.
| acknowledgments |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Arnold R. G., DiChristina, T. J., and Hoffman, M. R., 1988, Reductive dissolution of Fe(III) oxides by Pseudomonas sp. 200: Biotechnology and Bioengineering, v. 32, p. 10811096.[CrossRef]
Arvidson R. S., Ertan, I. E., Amonette, J. E., and Lüttge, A., 2003, Variation in Calcite Dissolution Rates: A Fundamental Problem?: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 67, p. 16231634.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]
Arvidson R. S., Beig, M. S., and Lüttge, A., 2004, Single-crystal plagioclase feldspar dissolution rates measured by vertical scanning interferometry: American Mineralogist, v. 89, p. 5156.
Bakke R., Characklis, W. G., Turakhia, M. H., and Yeh, A., 1990, Modeling a Monopopulation Biofilm System: Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, in Characklis, W. G., and Marshall, K. C., editors, Biofilms: New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., p. 487520.
Banfield J. F., Welch, S. A., and Edwards, K. J., 1998, Microbes as Geochemical Agents: The Geochemical News, No. 96, p. 1117.
Barker W. W., Welch, S. A., and Banfield, J. F., 1997, Biogeochemistry of silicate mineral weathering, in Banfield, J. F., and Nealson, K. H., editors, Geomicrobiology: Interactions between microbes and minerals: Mineralogical Society of America Reviews in Mineralogy, v. 35, p. 391428.[Abstract]
Bennett P. C., and Hiebert, F. K., 1992, Microbial mediation of silicate diagenesis in organic-rich natural waters, in Kharaka, Y. K., and Maest, A. S., editors, Water-Rock Interaction: Rotterdam, AA Balkema, p. 267270.
Bennett P. C., Hiebert, F. K., and Choi, W. J., 1996, Microbial colonization and weathering of silicates in a petroleum-contaminated aquifer: Chemical Geology, v. 132, p. 4553.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]
Boyd R. D., Verran, J., Jones, M. V., and Bhakoo, M., 2002, Use of the Atomic Force Microscope to Determine the Effect of Substratum Surface Topography on Bacterial Adhesion: Langmuir, v. 18, p. 23432346.[CrossRef]
Characklis W. G., 1990, Microbial Fouling, in Characklis, W. G., and Marshall, K. C., editors, Biofilms: New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., p. 523584.
Davis K. J., Dove, P. M., and De Yoreo, J. J., 2000, The role of Mg2+ as an impurity in calcite growth: Science, v. 290, p. 11341137.
Davis K. J., Dove, P. M., Wasylenki, L. E., and De Yoreo, J. J., 2004, Morphological consequences of differential Mg2+ incorporation at structurally distinct steps on calcite: American Mineralogist, v. 89, p. 714720.
Dawson M. P., Humphrey, B., and Marshall, K. C., 1981, Adhesion: A tactic in the survival strategy of a marine vibrio during starvation: Current Microbiology, v. 6, p. 19599.
DiChristina T. J., and DeLong, E. F., 1994, Isolation of anaerobic respiratory mutants of Shewanella putrefaciens and genetic analysis of mutants deficient in anaerobic growth on Fe3+: Journal of Bacteriology, v. 176, p. 14681474.
Ehrlich H. L., 1998, Geomicrobiology: its significance for geology: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 45, p. 4560.
1999, Microbes as Geologic Agents: Their Role in Mineral Formation: Geomicrobiology Journal, v. 16, p. 135153.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]
Flemming H. C., and Schaule, G., 1996, Biofouling, in Heitz, E., Flemming, H. C., and Sand, W., editors, Microbially Influenced Corrosion of Materials: Scientific and Engineering Aspects: Berlin, Springer, p. 3954.
Fletcher M., 1996, Bacterial Attachment in Aquatic Environments: A Diversity of Surfaces and Adhesion Strategies, in Fletcher, M., editor, Bacterial Adhesion: Molecular and Ecological Diversity: New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., p. 124.
Fletcher M., and Murphy, E., 2001, Transport of Microorganisms in the Subsurface: The Role of Attachment and Colonization of Particle Surfaces, in, Fredrickson, J. K., and Fletcher, M., editors, Subsurface Microbiology and Biogeochemistry: New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., p. 3968.
Fortin D., Ferris, F. G., and Beveridge, T. J., 1997, Surface-Mediated Mineral Development by Bacteria, in Banfield, J. F., and Nealson, K. H., editors, Geomicrobiology: Interactions between microbes and minerals: Mineralogical Society of America Reviews in Mineralogy, v. 35, p. 161177.[Abstract]
Geesey G. G., and Bryers, J. D., 2000, Biofouling of Engineered Materials and Systems, in Bryers, J. D., editor, Biofilms II: Process Analysis and Applications: New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., p. 237280.
Geesey G. G., Beech, I., Bremer, P. J., Webster, B. J. and Wells, D. B., 2000, Biocorrosion, in Bryers, J. D., editor, Biofilms II: Process Analysis and Applications: New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., p. 281326.
Grasso B. F., Smets, K. A., Strevett, B. D., Machinist, C. J., Van Oss, R. F., Giese, and Wu, W., 1996, Impact of Physiological State on Surface Thermodynamics and Adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Environmental Science and Technology, v. 30, p. 36043608.[CrossRef]
Gratz A. J., Hillner, P. E., and Hansma, P. K., 1993, Step dynamics and spiral growth on calcite: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 57, p. 491495.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]
Hamilton W. A., 1995, Biofilms and Microbially Influenced Corrosion, in Lappin-Scott, H. M., and Costerton, J. W., editors, Microbial Biofilms: New York, Cambridge University Press, p. 171182.
Hiebert F. K., and Bennett, P. C., 1992, Microbial control of silicate weathering in organic-rich ground water: Science, v. 258, p. 278281.
Higgins S. R., Bosbach, D., Eggleston, C. M., and Knauss, K. G., 2000, Kink Dynamics and Step Growth on Barium Sulfate (001): A Hydrothermal Scanning Probe Microscopy Study: Journal of Physical Chemistry B, v. 104, p. 69786982.[CrossRef]
Jordan G., and Rammensee, W., 1998, Dissolution rates of calcite (1014) obtained by scanning force microscopy: Microtopography-based dissolution kinetics on surface with anisotropic step velocities: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 62, p. 941947.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]
Kjelleberg S., and Hermansson, M., 1984, Starvation-induced effects on bacterial surface characteristics: Applied Environtmental Microbiology, v. 48, p. 497503.
Korber D. R., Lawrence, J. R., Lappin-Scott, H. M., and Costerton, J. W., 1995, Growth of Microorganisms on Surfaces, in Lappin-Scott, H. M., and Costerton, J. W., editors, Microbial Biofilms: New York, Cambridge University Press, p. 1545.
Lasaga A. C., and Lüttge, A., 2001, Variation of Crystal Dissolution Rate Based on a Dissolution Stepwave Model: Science, v. 291, p. 24002404.
2003, A model for crystal dissolution: European Journal of Mineralogy, v. 15, p. 603615.
Lens P., Moran, A. P., Mahony, T., Stoodley, P., and OFlaherty, V., 2003, Biofilms in Medicine, Industry and Environmental Biotechnology: Characteristics, Analysis and Control: Cornwall, IWA Publishing, 610 p.
Liang Y., Baer, D. R., McCoy, J. M., Amonette, J. E., and LaFemina, J. P., 1996, Dissolution kinetics at the calcite-water interface: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 60, p. 48834887.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]
Little B. J., Wagner, P. A., Characklis, W. G., and Lee, W., 1990, Microbial Corrosion, in Characklis, W. G., and Marshall, K. C., editors, Biofilms: New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., p. 635670.
Little B. J., Wagner, P. A., and Lewandowski, Z., 1997, Spatial Relationships Between Bacteria and Mineral Surfaces, in Banfield, J. F., and Nealson, K. H., editors, Geomicrobiology: Interactions between microbes and minerals: Mineralogical Society of America Reviews in Mineralogy, v. 35, p. 123155.[Abstract]
Lovley D. R., and Blunt-Harris, E. L., 1999, Role of Humic-Bound Iron as an Electron Transfer Agent in Dissimilatory Fe(III) Reduction: Applied and Environmental Microbiology, v. 65, p. 42524254.
Lovley D. R., and Phillips, E. J. P., 1988, Novel mode of microbial energy-metabolism: organic-carbon oxidation coupled to dissimilatory reduction of iron or manganese: Applied and Environmental Microbiology, v. 54, p. 14721480.
Lovley D. R., Coates, J. D., Blunt-Harris, E. L., Phillips, E. J. P., and Woodward, J. C., 1996, Humic substances as electron acceptors for microbial respiration: Nature, v. 382, p. 445448.[CrossRef]
Lower S. K., Tadanier, C. J., and Hochella, Jr., M. F., 2000, Measuring interfacial and adhesion forces between bacteria and mineral surfaces with biological force microscopy: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 64, p. 31333139.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]
2001a, Dynamics of the Mineral-Microbe Interface: Use of Biological Force Microscopy in Biogeochemistry and Geomicrobiology: Geomicrobiology Journal, v. 18, p. 6376.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]
Lower S. K., Hochella, Jr., M. F., and Beveridge, T. J., 2001b, Bacterial recognition of mineral surfaces: nanoscale interactions between Shewanella and
-FeOOH: Science, v. 292, p. 13601363.
Lüttge A., and Conrad, P. G., 2004, Direct Observation of Microbial Inhibition of Calcite Dissolution: Applied and Environmental Microbiology, v. 70 (3), p. 16271632.
Lüttge A., Bolton, E. W., and Lasaga, A. C., 1999, An Interferometric Study of the Dissolution Kinetics of Anorthite: The Role of Reactive Surface Area: American Journal of Science, v. 299, p. 652678.
Lüttge A., Winkler, U., and Lasaga, A. C., 2003, Interferometric study of dolomite dissolution: A new conceptual model for mineral dissolution: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 67, p. 10991116.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]
Marshall K. C., 1996, Adhesion as a strategy for access to nutrients, in Fletcher, M., editor, Bacterial Adhesion: New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., p. 5987.
Mills A. L., and Powelson, D. K., 1996, Bacterial Interactions with Surfaces in Soils, in Fletcher, M., editor, Bacterial Adhesion: Molecular and Ecological Diversity: New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., p. 2558.
Nealson K. H., and Myers, C. R., 1992, Microbial reduction of manganese and iron: New approaches to carbon cycling: Applied and Environmental Microbiology, v. 58, p. 439443.
Newman D. K., and Kolter, R., 2000, A role for excreted quinones in extracellular electron transfer: Nature, v. 405, p. 9497.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pina C. M., Becker, U., Risthaus, P., Bosbach, D., and Putnis, A., 1998, Molecular-scale mechanisms of crystal growth in barite: Nature, v. 395, p. 483486.[CrossRef]
Prince A., 1996, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa: Versatile Attachment Mechanisms, in Fletcher, M., editor, Bacterial Adhesion: Molecular and Ecological Diversity: New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., p. 183200.
Risthaus P., Bosbach, D., Becker, U., and Putnis, A., 2001, Barite scale formation and dissolution at high ionic strength studied with atomic force microscopy: Colloids and Surfaces A: Physiochemical and Engineering Aspects, v. 191, p. 201214.[CrossRef]
Rosso K. M., Zachara, J. M., Fredrickson, J. K., Gorby, Y. A., and Smith, S. C., 2003, Nonlocal bacterial electron transfer to hematite surfaces: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 67, p. 10811087.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]
Scheuerman T. R., Camper, A. K., and Hamilton, M. A., 1998, Effects of Substratum Topography on Bacterial Adhesion: Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, v. 208, p. 2333.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Teng H. H., Dove, P. M., Orme, C. A., and De Yoreo, J. J., 1998, Thermodynamics of Calcite Growth: Baseline for Understanding Biomineral Formation: Science, v. 282, p. 724727.
Teng H. H., Dove, P. M., and De Yoreo, J. J., 2000, Kinetics of calcite growth: surface processes and relationships to macroscopic rate laws: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 64, p. 22552266.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]
Tiedje J. M., 2002, Shewanella the environmentally versatile genome: Nature Biotechnology, v. 20, 10931094.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Videla H. A., 1996, Manual of Biocorrosion: Boca Raton, CRC Lewis Publishers, 273 p.
Wagner D., Fischer, W. R., Paradies, H. H., and von Franqué, O., 1996, Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion in Copper Potable Water Installations, in Heitz, E., Flemming, H. C., and Sand, W., editors, Microbially Influenced Corrosion of Materials: Scientific and Engineering Aspects: Berlin, Springer, p. 259269.
ZoBell C. E., 1943, The effect of solid surfaces upon bacterial activity: Journal of Bacteriology, v. 46, p. 3956.
| ||||||||||||||