AJS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Science, Vol. 309, April 2009, P.271-289; doi:10.2475/04.2009.01

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, J. D.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Biological energy in landscape evolution

Jonathan D. Phillips

Southern Landscape Systems Research Program, Department of Geography, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506-0027

jdp{at}uky.edu

Traditional conceptual models of landscape evolution view topography as an outcome of endogenic forces (uplift) working against exogenic forces of denudation. The energy considerations of these concepts have focused on the conversion of the potential energy of landscape relief to kinetic energy. The concept of the biosphere as a planetary membrane for capturing and converting solar energy, coupled with the critical geomorphic role of biota, call for a consideration of biotic contributions to geomorphic work. A review of estimates of global rates of kinetic energy of denudation and uplift, and net primary production (NPP) indicates that the energy density of NPP is, on average, three to seven orders of magnitude greater than the others. If even a tiny fraction of NPP is geologically significant, then the biological subsidy to the energy of landscape evolution must be considered on a par with that of geophysical and geochemical phenomena. A case study in eastern Kentucky shows that even if only 0.1 percent of NPP is geomorphically significant, it still far exceeds the energy inputs from uplift and conversion of potential to kinetic energy by denudation. This is unlikely to be unique, though the relative importance of biological and geophysical processes must obviously vary with climate, tectonic setting, and other factors. Results indicate that, particularly where biological activity is significant, geomorphic work performed by biota may be greater than that associated with endogenic processes and with the kinetic energy of denudation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Journal of Science.