AJS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Science, Vol. 308, December 2008, P.1083-1114; doi:10.2475/10.2008.02

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Balco, G.
Right arrow Articles by Rovey, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Right arrow Articles by Balco, G.
Right arrow Articles by Rovey, C. W., II
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

An isochron method for cosmogenic-nuclide dating of buried soils and sediments

Greg Balco*,***,{dagger} and Charles W. Rovey, II**

* Quaternary Research Center and Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-1310 USA
** Geography, Geology, and Planning, Missouri State University, Springfield, Missouri 65897 USA
*** Present address: Berkeley Geochronology Center, 2455 Ridge Road, Berkeley, California 94709 USA

{dagger} Corresponding author: balcs{at}bgc.org

We describe an improved method for dating buried paleosols using measurements of the cosmic-ray-produced radionuclides 10Be and 26Al in quartz grains, and apply it to a sequence of intercalated tills and paleosols in central Missouri, USA, that record Plio-Pleistocene advances of the Laurentide Ice Sheet. A buried paleosol implies a period of surface exposure and nuclide accumulation, followed by burial and a halt to nuclide production. If the paleosol is formed in a sedimentary unit such as till, this unit may also have been emplaced with unknown 26Al and 10Be concentrations inherited from past surface exposure. If the inherited nuclide concentrations are the same at all depths in the soil—as is true for well-mixed sediments such as till—then the 26Al and 10Be concentrations at different depths in the paleosol will show a linear relationship. The slope of this line depends on the duration of burial of the paleosol, but not on the inherited nuclide concentrations or on the sample depths. Thus, one can date strata overlying buried paleosols by measuring 26Al and 10Be at multiple depths in the paleosol and calculating the burial age of the paleosol from the resulting isochron. We focus on applying this approach to till-paleosol sequences, but the basic idea of forming an 26Al-10Be burial isochron with a set of samples that share the same burial age, but differ in other aspects of their exposure history, applies to other stratigraphic settings as well. The method yields ages for four tills in Missouri that are stratigraphically consistent, agree with paleomagnetic age constraints, and show that ice advanced into Missouri near 1.25 Ma, near 0.8 Ma, and twice between ca. 0.4 and 0.2 Ma.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeologyHome page
G. Balco and C. W. Rovey II
Absolute chronology for major Pleistocene advances of the Laurentide Ice Sheet
Geology, September 1, 2010; 38(9): 795 - 798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Journal of Science.