AJS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Science, Vol. 303, October 2003, P.723-752

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bozhilov, K. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bozhilov, K. N.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Stability and thermodynamic properties of ferro-actinolite: A re-investigation

David M. Jenkins* and Krassimir N. Bozhilov**

* Department of Geological Sciences and Environmental Studies, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York 13902-6000
** Central Facility for Advanced Microscopy and Microanalysis, Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, Riverside, California 92521

dmjenks{at}binghamton.edu

A re-investigation of the synthesis, characterization, and upper-thermal stability of ferro-actinolite has been performed in the system CaO-FeO-SiO2-H2O. Synthesis experiments were done over the range of 2 to 10 kbar and 420° to 600°C for several bulk compositions along the join Ca2Fe5Si8O22(OH)2 - Fe7Si8O22(OH)2 and at oxygen fugacities (fO2) defined by the vessel (~Ni-NiO), Co-CoO, and iron-magnetite (IM) buffers. The highest yields of actinolite were obtained at 2 kbar, 420°C, and at the relatively oxidizing conditions of the Ni-NiO buffer. Grinding and retreatment of the sample was found to be important for increasing the yield of amphibole up to a maximum of about 70 weight percent; however, complete yields of actinolite were never obtained indicating some physical barrier or incorrect chemical (fO2) conditions preventing complete reaction. The highest-yield actinolite syntheses were characterized using a high-resolution transmission electron microscope (TEM) equipped with an energy-dispersive spectrometer. A survey of representative grains using the TEM revealed the presence of very few chain-multiplicity faults (A'(2) = 0.98 –0.99); however, a rather large spread of compositions was observed, with crystals having Ca contents that range from as little as 0.5 up to 2.0 Ca atoms per formula unit (apfu). There was no clear correlation between actinolite crystal composition and the bulk composition of the starting material. By combining these analyses with three other techniques for determining the composition of the synthetic actinolite (that is, volume-composition relationships, Rietveld refinement of Ca and Fe on the M4 site, and mass balancing involving bulk-composition and mineral-proportions), the average composition of the synthetic actinolite was determined to be Ca1.67Fe5.33Si8O22(OH)2. Experimental reversals were obtained on reaction (1): 2 ferro-actinolite = 4 hedenbergite + 3 fayalite + 5 quartz + 2 water over the range of 1 to 5 kbar and 500° to 525°C with the fO2 defined by the Co-CoO buffer. A parallel set of experiments on reaction (1) was done in the presence of grunerite and the iron-magnetite/wüstite-magnetite (IM/WM) buffers. These latter experiments allowed the direct comparison of the upper-thermal stability of actinolite via reaction (1) and of Ca-saturated grunerite via reaction (2): 2 grunerite = 7 fayalite + 9 quartz + 2 water. Reaction (2) was found to lie 20° to 60°C above reaction (1). Modeling the miscibility gap between actinolite and grunerite as a regular solution with W = 15.3 kJ, a thermodynamic analysis of the internal consistency of the experimental reversals for reaction (1) was performed, from which the best-fit values of 696.4 J/K · mol and –10,518.2 kJ/mol were derived for the S° and {Delta}Hfo of pure ferro-actinolite, respectively. Calculation of the invariant array of curves involving the phases ferro-actinolite, grunerite, hedenbergite, fayalite, quartz, and water indicate that reaction (1) is metastable at all geologically relevant pressures and that the stable reaction defining the stability limit of ferro-actinolite is 7 ferro-actinolite = 14 hedenbergite + 3 grunerite + 4 quartz + 4 water.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
H. L. Lledo and D. M. Jenkins
Experimental Investigation of the Upper Thermal Stability of Mg-rich Actinolite; Implications for Kiruna-Type Iron Deposits
J. Petrology, February 1, 2008; 49(2): 225 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
W. V. Maresch and M. Czank
The Significance of the Reaction Path in Synthesizing Single-Phase Amphibole of Defined Composition
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, October 1, 2007; 67(1): 287 - 322.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
J. Driscall, D. M. Jenkins, M. D. Dyar, and K. N. Bozhilov
Cation ordering in synthetic low-calcium actinolite
American Mineralogist, May 1, 2005; 90(5-6): 900 - 911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
O. Vidal, T. Parra, and P. Vieillard
Thermodynamic properties of the Tschermak solid solution in Fe-chlorite: Application to natural examples and possible role of oxidation
American Mineralogist, February 1, 2005; 90(2-3): 347 - 358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
T. Parra, O. Vidal, and T. Theye
Experimental data on the Tschermak substitution in Fe-chlorite
American Mineralogist, February 1, 2005; 90(2-3): 359 - 370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Journal of Science.