AJS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Science, Vol. 302, December 2002, P.827-855

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flemings, P. B.
Right arrow Articles by Zoback, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Right arrow Articles by Flemings, P. B.
Right arrow Articles by Zoback, M.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Flow focusing in overpressured sandstones: Theory, observations, and applications

Peter B. Flemings*, Beth B. Stump*,**, Thomas Finkbeiner***,**** and Mark Zoback***

* Department of Geosciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
** Now at ChevronTexaco Production Co., 935 Gravier Street, New Orleans, Lousiana 70112
*** Department of Geophysics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2215
**** Now at Geomechanics International, Technologie Zentrum Mainz, IBM-Gelände, Gebäude 51, Hechtsheimer Str. 2, 55131 Mainz, Germany

flemings{at}geosc.psu.edu

Dipping permeable sandstone bodies encased in overpressured low permeability mudstone have a characteristic pressure field: sandstone pressures follow the hydrostatic gradient while mudstone pressures have a steeper (often lithostatic) gradient. This pressure distribution drives fluid into the base of the sandstone and expels it at the crest. We use mudstone pressures predicted from porosity and measured sandstone pressures to describe the spatial variation in pressure in two Eugene Island 330 reservoirs (Gulf of Mexico). In one severely overpressured reservoir, bounding mudstones are less compacted at the reservoir crest than at the reservoir base, and we interpret that flow is focused along the reservoir and expelled at the crest. In the second reservoir, mudstone is compacted around the base of the sandstone, and we interpret pore fluids were drawn into the sandstone. Dipping sandstone bodies encased in overpressured mudstone regulate hydrocarbon migration, affect borehole stability, and impact slope stability.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
D. E. Sawyer, P. B. Flemings, R. C. Shipp, and C. D. Winker
Seismic geomorphology, lithology, and evolution of the late Pleistocene Mars-Ursa turbidite region, Mississippi Canyon area, northern Gulf of Mexico
AAPG Bulletin, February 1, 2007; 91(2): 215 - 234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
Reservoir pressure and seafloor venting: Predicting trap integrity in a Gulf of Mexico deepwater turbidite minibasin
AAPG Bulletin, February 1, 2005; 89(2): 193 - 209.



Home page
GeologyHome page
Critical pressure and multiphase flow in Blake Ridge gas hydrates
Geology, December 1, 2003; 31(12): 1057 - 1060.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Journal of Science.