| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195
Digital elevation models of two "steady-state" mountain ranges, the Olympic Mountains (OM) and Oregon Coast Range (OCR), are used to examine relationships between slope distributions, the development of threshold hillslopes, and steady-state topography. Plots of drainage area versus slope for these mountain ranges exhibit substantial scatter that complicates comparison of range form to analytical theories and landscape evolution models. Contour plots of the density of such data reveal an attractor at the scale of the transition from hillslope processes to channel processes, and log-bin averaging reveals trends that parallel predictions of steady-state erosion laws but with different rate laws for five distinct process domains: hillslopes, valley heads, and colluvial, bedrock, and alluvial valley segments. Slope histograms computed for 100 km2 areas (defined by a 10 x 10 km grid) throughout the OM exhibit approximately normal or exponential distributions in areas of active rock uplift and depositional topography, respectively. Local slope distributions in the OCR also tend to be normally distributed, but some are left-skewed in areas with gentler slopes. Mean slopes determined both over the above referenced grid and a 10-km diam moving window are relatively invariant in the core of the OM in spite of strong contrasts in bedrock erodibility and gradients in long-term rock uplift rates. In contrast, the mean slopes in the OCR parallel latitudinal gradients in rock uplift rates and bedrock erodibility. Hence, the slope distributions in the OM and OCR reflect distinct relationships between development of threshold bedrock and soil-mantled hillslopes and steady-state topography.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. J. Roering How well can hillslope evolution models "explain" topography? Simulating soil transport and production with high-resolution topographic data Geological Society of America Bulletin, September 1, 2008; 120(9-10): 1248 - 1262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. A. Allen Time scales of tectonic landscapes and their sediment routing systems Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2008; 296(1): 7 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. K. Clark The Significance of Paleotopography Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, October 1, 2007; 66(1): 1 - 21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. A. Binnie, W. M. Phillips, M. A. Summerfield, and L. K. Fifield Tectonic uplift, threshold hillslopes, and denudation rates in a developing mountain range Geology, August 1, 2007; 35(8): 743 - 746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. de Vente, J. Poesen, M. Arabkhedri, and G. Verstraeten The sediment delivery problem revisited Progress in Physical Geography, April 1, 2007; 31(2): 155 - 178. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. B. Stolar, S. D. Willett, and G. H. Roe Climatic and tectonic forcing of a critical orogen Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2006; 398(0): 241 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Wolinsky and L. F. Pratson Constraints on landscape evolution from slope histograms Geology, June 1, 2005; 33(6): 477 - 480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. J. Roering, J. W. Kirchner, and W. E. Dietrich Characterizing structural and lithologic controls on deep-seated landsliding: Implications for topographic relief and landscape evolution in the Oregon Coast Range, USA Geological Society of America Bulletin, May 1, 2005; 117(5-6): 654 - 668. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Martin and M. Church Numerical modelling of landscape evolution: geomorphological perspectives Progress in Physical Geography, September 1, 2004; 28(3): 317 - 339. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. J. Gabet, B. A. Pratt-Sitaula, and D. W. Burbank Climatic controls on hillslope angle and relief in the Himalayas Geology, July 1, 2004; 32(7): 629 - 632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Verwer, J. A. M. Kenter, B. Maathuis, and G. Della Porta Stratal patterns and lithofacies of an intact seismic-scale Carboniferous carbonate platform (Asturias, northwestern Spain): a virtual outcrop model Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2004; 239(1): 29 - 41. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Bonnet and A. Crave Landscape response to climate change: Insights from experimental modeling and implications for tectonic versus climatic uplift of topography Geology, February 1, 2003; 31(2): 123 - 126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Duncan, J. Masek, and E. Fielding How steep are the Himalaya? Characteristics and implications of along-strike topographic variations Geology, January 1, 2003; 31(1): 75 - 78. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. R. Montgomery Valley formation by fluvial and glacial erosion Geology, November 1, 2002; 30(11): 1047 - 1050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
